Monitoring Oxygen Delivery During Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Preliminary Multinational Practice Survey.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Salman Pervaiz Butt, Drisya Paul, Salman Abdulaziz, Laszlo Gobolos, Huda Alfoudri, Yusuf Bayrak, Mohamed Azzam, Ibrahim Fawzy Hassan, Arun Kumar, Fazil Ashiq, Arshad Ghori, Vivek Kakar, Umer Darr, Gopal Bhatnagar
{"title":"Monitoring Oxygen Delivery During Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Preliminary Multinational Practice Survey.","authors":"Salman Pervaiz Butt, Drisya Paul, Salman Abdulaziz, Laszlo Gobolos, Huda Alfoudri, Yusuf Bayrak, Mohamed Azzam, Ibrahim Fawzy Hassan, Arun Kumar, Fazil Ashiq, Arshad Ghori, Vivek Kakar, Umer Darr, Gopal Bhatnagar","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Oxygen delivery (DO<sub>2</sub>) is a pivotal factor in maintaining adequate tissue protection during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Despite its clinical significance, there is currently no global consensus regarding standardized DO<sub>2</sub> monitoring or threshold strategies during CPB. This study aimed to evaluate current global practices related to DO<sub>2</sub> monitoring during CPB and to assess awareness, implementation, and perceived clinical benefits, particularly in reducing acute kidney injury.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional international survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Cardiac surgery centers globally, with distribution through platforms including the South West Asia and Africa Chapter of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 120 respondents including perfusionists, anesthesiologists, and cardiac surgeons.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable (survey-based observational study).</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The survey revealed 73.9% of centers actively practiced goal-directed perfusion (GDP), with significantly higher adoption in high-volume centers (>500 cases/year) (82% v 65% in low-volume centers). Monitoring methods varied, with 48.7% of respondents using continuous devices and 37.8% using intermittent calculations. For target parameters, more than 80% of respondents maintained specific DO<sub>2</sub> thresholds, whereas hemoglobin management most focused on 80 to 90 g/L (32.8%), and cardiac index typically ranged from 2.4 to 2.6 L/min/m<sup>2</sup> (65%). Clinical benefits include reduced acute kidney injury incidence reported by 55% of GDP users, although implementation barriers persisted, particularly financial constraints (45%) and limited resources (38%), preventing a wider adoption of continuous monitoring in resource-limited settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings reveal significant global variability and underuse of DO<sub>2</sub> monitoring during CPB. Despite emerging evidence supporting the benefits of GDP strategies, widespread adoption remains limited. Cost and limited access to advanced monitoring in low-resource settings were considered the major barriers that prevented continuous monitoring of DO<sub>2</sub> during CPB. These insights highlight an urgent need for international guidelines and standardization to optimize patient outcomes in cardiac surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2025.09.010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Oxygen delivery (DO2) is a pivotal factor in maintaining adequate tissue protection during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Despite its clinical significance, there is currently no global consensus regarding standardized DO2 monitoring or threshold strategies during CPB. This study aimed to evaluate current global practices related to DO2 monitoring during CPB and to assess awareness, implementation, and perceived clinical benefits, particularly in reducing acute kidney injury.

Design: A cross-sectional international survey.

Setting: Cardiac surgery centers globally, with distribution through platforms including the South West Asia and Africa Chapter of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization.

Participants: A total of 120 respondents including perfusionists, anesthesiologists, and cardiac surgeons.

Interventions: Not applicable (survey-based observational study).

Measurements and main results: The survey revealed 73.9% of centers actively practiced goal-directed perfusion (GDP), with significantly higher adoption in high-volume centers (>500 cases/year) (82% v 65% in low-volume centers). Monitoring methods varied, with 48.7% of respondents using continuous devices and 37.8% using intermittent calculations. For target parameters, more than 80% of respondents maintained specific DO2 thresholds, whereas hemoglobin management most focused on 80 to 90 g/L (32.8%), and cardiac index typically ranged from 2.4 to 2.6 L/min/m2 (65%). Clinical benefits include reduced acute kidney injury incidence reported by 55% of GDP users, although implementation barriers persisted, particularly financial constraints (45%) and limited resources (38%), preventing a wider adoption of continuous monitoring in resource-limited settings.

Conclusions: These findings reveal significant global variability and underuse of DO2 monitoring during CPB. Despite emerging evidence supporting the benefits of GDP strategies, widespread adoption remains limited. Cost and limited access to advanced monitoring in low-resource settings were considered the major barriers that prevented continuous monitoring of DO2 during CPB. These insights highlight an urgent need for international guidelines and standardization to optimize patient outcomes in cardiac surgery.

监测体外循环过程中的氧气输送:一项初步的跨国实践调查。
目的:氧输送(DO2)是体外循环(CPB)中维持足够的组织保护的关键因素。尽管具有临床意义,但目前尚无关于CPB期间标准化DO2监测或阈值策略的全球共识。本研究旨在评估CPB期间与DO2监测相关的当前全球实践,并评估意识、实施和感知的临床益处,特别是在减少急性肾损伤方面。设计:横断面国际调查。环境:全球心脏外科中心,通过包括体外生命支持组织西南亚和非洲分会在内的平台进行分销。参与者:共有120名受访者,包括灌注师、麻醉师和心脏外科医生。干预措施:不适用(基于调查的观察性研究)。测量结果和主要结果:调查显示,73.9%的中心积极实施目标导向灌注(GDP),在大容量中心(每年500例)的采用率明显更高(82% vs 65%)。监测方法各不相同,48.7%的受访者使用连续设备,37.8%使用间歇计算。对于目标参数,超过80%的受访者维持特定的DO2阈值,而血红蛋白管理主要集中在80至90 g/L(32.8%),心脏指数通常在2.4至2.6 L/min/m2(65%)之间。临床益处包括55%的GDP使用者报告的急性肾损伤发生率降低,尽管实施障碍仍然存在,特别是财政限制(45%)和有限的资源(38%),阻碍了在资源有限的环境中更广泛地采用连续监测。结论:这些发现揭示了CPB期间显著的全球变异性和DO2监测的未充分利用。尽管越来越多的证据支持GDP战略的好处,但广泛采用仍然有限。在低资源环境中,成本和高级监测的有限获得被认为是阻碍CPB期间持续监测DO2的主要障碍。这些见解强调了迫切需要制定国际指南和标准化来优化心脏手术患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信