Evaluating Fundamentals of Vaginal Surgery for Use Among Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents in Accra, Ghana.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Marie Bangura, Gabriel Ganyaglo, David Kupualor, Alex Boateng, Perez Sepenu, Isaac Koranteng, Emma R Lawrence, Deborah Rooney, Payton Schmidt
{"title":"Evaluating Fundamentals of Vaginal Surgery for Use Among Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents in Accra, Ghana.","authors":"Marie Bangura, Gabriel Ganyaglo, David Kupualor, Alex Boateng, Perez Sepenu, Isaac Koranteng, Emma R Lawrence, Deborah Rooney, Payton Schmidt","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06343-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>We aimed to assess obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn) resident experience and confidence with vaginal surgery and ability to perform basic vaginal surgery skills using a vaginal surgery simulator at a teaching hospital in Ghana. We present validity evidence and a region-specific proficiency score that can be used for training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study at a teaching hospital in Accra, Ghana, Ob/Gyn residents in a 3-year training program completed a survey on demographics, vaginal surgery exposure, and surgical confidence. Using the Fundamentals of Vaginal Surgery (FVS) simulation system, participants performed five timed tasks twice each. A region-specific proficiency score of ≥ 266 was used to assess skill proficiency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four participants were enrolled. Of the 22 who provided details about types of vaginal surgery they had performed, only two (9.1%) had completed a vaginal hysterectomy in the past 12 months. All participants described being \"not at all confident\" in performing vaginal hysterectomy and other vaginal surgeries and \"somewhat or slightly confident\" in their surgical skills. The median (IQR) overall normalized score for the FVS hands-on skills assessment was 57.5 (6.3, 113.8) for novice and 160.0 (95.8, 312.0) for experienced participants (P = 0.005). Five percent of novice and 28.6% of experienced participants achieved the proficiency score of ≥ 266.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We present validity evidence and a region-specific proficiency score supporting the use of FVS in a Ghanaian training program. Limited experience in vaginal surgery, low confidence and performance scores highlight an opportunity to utilize this training system.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06343-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: We aimed to assess obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn) resident experience and confidence with vaginal surgery and ability to perform basic vaginal surgery skills using a vaginal surgery simulator at a teaching hospital in Ghana. We present validity evidence and a region-specific proficiency score that can be used for training.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study at a teaching hospital in Accra, Ghana, Ob/Gyn residents in a 3-year training program completed a survey on demographics, vaginal surgery exposure, and surgical confidence. Using the Fundamentals of Vaginal Surgery (FVS) simulation system, participants performed five timed tasks twice each. A region-specific proficiency score of ≥ 266 was used to assess skill proficiency.

Results: Thirty-four participants were enrolled. Of the 22 who provided details about types of vaginal surgery they had performed, only two (9.1%) had completed a vaginal hysterectomy in the past 12 months. All participants described being "not at all confident" in performing vaginal hysterectomy and other vaginal surgeries and "somewhat or slightly confident" in their surgical skills. The median (IQR) overall normalized score for the FVS hands-on skills assessment was 57.5 (6.3, 113.8) for novice and 160.0 (95.8, 312.0) for experienced participants (P = 0.005). Five percent of novice and 28.6% of experienced participants achieved the proficiency score of ≥ 266.

Conclusions: We present validity evidence and a region-specific proficiency score supporting the use of FVS in a Ghanaian training program. Limited experience in vaginal surgery, low confidence and performance scores highlight an opportunity to utilize this training system.

评估阴道手术在加纳阿克拉产科和妇科居民中使用的基础知识。
前言和假设:我们的目的是评估妇产科(Ob/Gyn)住院医师对阴道手术的经验和信心,以及在加纳的一家教学医院使用阴道手术模拟器执行基本阴道手术技能的能力。我们提出了有效性证据和一个区域特定的熟练程度分数,可以用于培训。方法:在这项横断面研究中,在加纳阿克拉的一家教学医院,接受了3年培训计划的妇产科住院医师完成了一项关于人口统计学、阴道手术暴露和手术信心的调查。使用阴道手术基础(FVS)模拟系统,参与者执行五个定时任务,每个任务两次。区域熟练程度评分≥266用于评估技能熟练程度。结果:34名受试者入组。在22名提供阴道手术类型的详细信息的人中,只有2名(9.1%)在过去12个月内完成了阴道子宫切除术。所有的参与者都描述自己对阴道子宫切除术和其他阴道手术“完全没有信心”,对自己的手术技巧“有点或稍微有信心”。FVS动手技能评估的中位数(IQR)总体标准化得分为新手57.5(6.3,113.8),经验丰富的参与者160.0 (95.8,312.0)(P = 0.005)。5%的新手和28.6%的有经验的参与者达到了≥266的熟练程度得分。结论:我们提出了效度证据和支持在加纳培训计划中使用FVS的区域特定熟练度评分。有限的阴道手术经验,低信心和表现分数突出了利用这个培训系统的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信