Assessing the Impact of Imaging Parameters on MRI Measurement of Kidney T2.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Alexander J Daniel, Susan T Francis
{"title":"Assessing the Impact of Imaging Parameters on MRI Measurement of Kidney T<sub>2</sub>.","authors":"Alexander J Daniel, Susan T Francis","doi":"10.1002/jmri.70127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>T<sub>2</sub>-mapping has promise to evaluate kidney pathophysiology. Prior studies show a large variance in kidney T<sub>2</sub>, likely due to the differing acquisition sequences.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare four T<sub>2</sub>-mapping sequences to investigate kidney T<sub>2</sub>.</p><p><strong>Study type: </strong>Phantom and prospective in vivo assessments.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>ISMRM/NIST and QASPER phantoms; 8 healthy volunteers (4 female, 30 ± 8 years).</p><p><strong>Field strength/sequence: </strong>3 T, spin echo-echo planar imaging (SE-EPI), multi-echo-spin echo (ME-SE), Gradient and Spin Echo (GraSE) vendor-provided sequences, and custom T<sub>2</sub>-prepared EPI, Dual-echo B<sub>0</sub>-mapping and DREAM B<sub>1</sub>-mapping.</p><p><strong>Assessment: </strong>T<sub>2</sub>-mapping accuracy in the ISMRM/NIST phantom in the presence of B<sub>0</sub> frequency offset and B<sub>1</sub> <sup>+</sup> by scaling of flip angles, and in the QASPER phantom in the presence of diffusion by altering pump rate compared to being turned off. Participants underwent a single 45-min exam to collect four T<sub>2</sub>-mapping sequences, B<sub>0</sub> and B<sub>1</sub> maps. In vivo T<sub>2</sub> values compared across sequences and the influence of B<sub>0</sub> and B<sub>1</sub> <sup>+</sup> was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Statistical tests: </strong>Shapiro-Wilk, Wilcoxon signed-rank, Student's t-test, Coefficient of Variation, Pearson's correlation coefficient, linear mixed effect model. p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SE-EPI, ME-SE, GraSE, and T<sub>2</sub>-prepared EPI had a mean absolute scaled error of 0.52, 0.52, 0.36, and 0.27 over the kidney T<sub>2</sub> range of the ISMRM/NIST phantom. GraSE was most robust to perturbations in B<sub>0</sub>/B<sub>1</sub> <sup>+</sup>. In the QASPER phantom, SE-EPI was highly sensitive to diffusion leading to T<sub>2</sub> shortening (66%), while multi-echo sequences had lower diffusion sensitivity ordered by shortest echo spacing (ME-SE 81%, T<sub>2</sub>-prepared EPI 90%, GraSE 95% reduction in T<sub>2</sub>). In vivo, SE-EPI measured T<sub>2</sub> was significantly lower than multi-echo sequences, and SE-EPI and T<sub>2</sub>-preparation had a -0.52 ± 0.08 and -0.57 ± 0.06 ms/% dependence on B<sub>1</sub> <sup>+</sup>.</p><p><strong>Data conclusion: </strong>To reduce B<sub>0</sub>, B<sub>1</sub> <sup>+</sup>, and diffusion sensitivity for kidney T<sub>2</sub>-mapping, a multi-echo sequence spanning echo times up to the kidney T<sub>2</sub> (~140 ms at 3 T) is recommended. Collecting data with different echo spacings can isolate the diffusion-related T<sub>2</sub> component.</p><p><strong>Evidence level: </strong>2.</p><p><strong>Technical efficacy: </strong>Stage 1.</p>","PeriodicalId":16140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.70127","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: T2-mapping has promise to evaluate kidney pathophysiology. Prior studies show a large variance in kidney T2, likely due to the differing acquisition sequences.

Purpose: To compare four T2-mapping sequences to investigate kidney T2.

Study type: Phantom and prospective in vivo assessments.

Participants: ISMRM/NIST and QASPER phantoms; 8 healthy volunteers (4 female, 30 ± 8 years).

Field strength/sequence: 3 T, spin echo-echo planar imaging (SE-EPI), multi-echo-spin echo (ME-SE), Gradient and Spin Echo (GraSE) vendor-provided sequences, and custom T2-prepared EPI, Dual-echo B0-mapping and DREAM B1-mapping.

Assessment: T2-mapping accuracy in the ISMRM/NIST phantom in the presence of B0 frequency offset and B1 + by scaling of flip angles, and in the QASPER phantom in the presence of diffusion by altering pump rate compared to being turned off. Participants underwent a single 45-min exam to collect four T2-mapping sequences, B0 and B1 maps. In vivo T2 values compared across sequences and the influence of B0 and B1 + was evaluated.

Statistical tests: Shapiro-Wilk, Wilcoxon signed-rank, Student's t-test, Coefficient of Variation, Pearson's correlation coefficient, linear mixed effect model. p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results: SE-EPI, ME-SE, GraSE, and T2-prepared EPI had a mean absolute scaled error of 0.52, 0.52, 0.36, and 0.27 over the kidney T2 range of the ISMRM/NIST phantom. GraSE was most robust to perturbations in B0/B1 +. In the QASPER phantom, SE-EPI was highly sensitive to diffusion leading to T2 shortening (66%), while multi-echo sequences had lower diffusion sensitivity ordered by shortest echo spacing (ME-SE 81%, T2-prepared EPI 90%, GraSE 95% reduction in T2). In vivo, SE-EPI measured T2 was significantly lower than multi-echo sequences, and SE-EPI and T2-preparation had a -0.52 ± 0.08 and -0.57 ± 0.06 ms/% dependence on B1 +.

Data conclusion: To reduce B0, B1 +, and diffusion sensitivity for kidney T2-mapping, a multi-echo sequence spanning echo times up to the kidney T2 (~140 ms at 3 T) is recommended. Collecting data with different echo spacings can isolate the diffusion-related T2 component.

Evidence level: 2.

Technical efficacy: Stage 1.

评估成像参数对肾脏T2 MRI测量的影响。
背景:t2mapping在评估肾脏病理生理方面具有前景。先前的研究显示肾脏T2的差异很大,可能是由于不同的获取序列。目的:比较4种T2定位序列对肾脏T2的影响。研究类型:幻影和前瞻性体内评估。参与者:ISMRM/NIST和QASPER幻影;健康志愿者8名(女性4名,30±8岁)。场强/序列:3t,自旋回波回波平面成像(SE-EPI),多回波自旋回波(ME-SE),梯度和自旋回波(GraSE)供应商提供的序列,定制t2制备的EPI,双回波B0-mapping和DREAM B1-mapping。评估:ISMRM/NIST幻像在B0频率偏移和B1 +频率偏移的情况下,通过缩放翻转角度,以及QASPER幻像在扩散存在的情况下,通过改变泵速与关闭相比,t2映射的准确性。参与者接受一次45分钟的检查,收集4个t2映射序列,B0和B1映射。比较不同序列的体内T2值,并评估B0和B1 +的影响。统计检验:Shapiro-Wilk、Wilcoxon sign -rank、Student's t检验、变异系数、Pearson相关系数、线性混合效应模型。结果:SE-EPI、ME-SE、GraSE和T2制备的EPI在ISMRM/NIST模型的肾脏T2范围内的平均绝对缩放误差为0.52、0.52、0.36和0.27。GraSE对B0/B1 +的扰动最稳定。在QASPER幻影中,SE-EPI对扩散非常敏感,导致T2缩短(66%),而多回声序列的扩散敏感性较低,以最短回声间隔排序(ME-SE 81%, T2制备EPI 90%, GraSE 95%)。体内,SE-EPI测量的T2明显低于多回声序列,SE-EPI和T2制备对B1 +的依赖性分别为-0.52±0.08和-0.57±0.06 ms/%。数据结论:为了降低肾T2定位的B0、B1 +和扩散敏感性,建议使用跨越回声时间至肾T2的多回声序列(3t时~140 ms)。采集不同回波间隔的数据可以隔离与扩散相关的T2分量。证据等级:2。技术功效:第一阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.80%
发文量
494
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (JMRI) is an international journal devoted to the timely publication of basic and clinical research, educational and review articles, and other information related to the diagnostic applications of magnetic resonance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信