Predicting post-cardiac surgery vasopressor use in a large, multicenter national cardiac surgical database.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Enya Martic, Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi, Jenni Williams-Spence, Julian A Smith, Christopher M Reid, Lavinia Tran, David Pilcher, Tim G Coulson
{"title":"Predicting post-cardiac surgery vasopressor use in a large, multicenter national cardiac surgical database.","authors":"Enya Martic, Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi, Jenni Williams-Spence, Julian A Smith, Christopher M Reid, Lavinia Tran, David Pilcher, Tim G Coulson","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop a model to predict post-cardiac surgery vasopressor administration and describe hospital variation in practice.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Multi-institutional.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>All patients who underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass between 2012 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Observational.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The study cohort was divided into a development set (80%) and a validation set (20%). Univariate logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with postoperative vasopressor administration. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator was used to develop parsimonious models with variables known preoperatively only (preoperative model), as well as preoperative and immediate postoperative variables (postoperative model). Model discrimination and calibration were performed on both the development and validation sets. The study included 106,348 patients across 33 hospitals. The incidence of postoperative vasopressor administration was 29.3% (n = 31,157). Significant interhospital variability in the rate of the outcome was observed, ranging from 1.20% to 69.4% (median, 22.3%). Fixed effects models with patient and surgical variables were developed for postoperative vasopressor administration, with an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.56 and 0.60 preoperatively and postoperatively, respectively. Accounting for the hospital of admission through mixed effects multilevel modeling improved the area under the receiver operating curve to 0.75 and 0.76 preoperatively and postoperatively, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Post-cardiac surgery vasopressor administration can only be predicted with poor to fair accuracy based on patient and surgical variables alone. Significant institutional variation in the rate of vasopressor administration exists, seemingly unrelated to measured patient and surgical factors, and predictive ability improves substantially when this is considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2025.09.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To develop a model to predict post-cardiac surgery vasopressor administration and describe hospital variation in practice.

Design: Retrospective analysis.

Setting: Multi-institutional.

Participants: All patients who underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass between 2012 and 2021.

Interventions: Observational.

Measurements and main results: The study cohort was divided into a development set (80%) and a validation set (20%). Univariate logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with postoperative vasopressor administration. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator was used to develop parsimonious models with variables known preoperatively only (preoperative model), as well as preoperative and immediate postoperative variables (postoperative model). Model discrimination and calibration were performed on both the development and validation sets. The study included 106,348 patients across 33 hospitals. The incidence of postoperative vasopressor administration was 29.3% (n = 31,157). Significant interhospital variability in the rate of the outcome was observed, ranging from 1.20% to 69.4% (median, 22.3%). Fixed effects models with patient and surgical variables were developed for postoperative vasopressor administration, with an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.56 and 0.60 preoperatively and postoperatively, respectively. Accounting for the hospital of admission through mixed effects multilevel modeling improved the area under the receiver operating curve to 0.75 and 0.76 preoperatively and postoperatively, respectively.

Conclusions: Post-cardiac surgery vasopressor administration can only be predicted with poor to fair accuracy based on patient and surgical variables alone. Significant institutional variation in the rate of vasopressor administration exists, seemingly unrelated to measured patient and surgical factors, and predictive ability improves substantially when this is considered.

在一个大型、多中心的国家心脏外科数据库中预测心脏手术后血管加压药的使用。
目的:建立一个预测心脏手术后血管加压药物使用的模型,并描述医院在实践中的变化。设计:回顾性分析。背景:多。参与者:所有在2012年至2021年间接受心脏手术和体外循环的患者。干预措施:观察。测量和主要结果:研究队列分为发展组(80%)和验证组(20%)。单因素logistic回归用于确定与术后血管加压药物使用相关的变量。最小绝对收缩和选择算子用于建立包含术前已知变量(术前模型)以及术前和术后立即变量(术后模型)的简约模型。在开发集和验证集上进行模型判别和校准。该研究包括33家医院的106348名患者。术后给药血管加压素的发生率为29.3% (n = 31,157)。观察到结果率在医院间存在显著差异,范围从1.20%到69.4%(中位数为22.3%)。建立患者和手术变量对术后血管加压药给药的固定效应模型,术前和术后受者操作曲线下面积分别为0.56和0.60。考虑到入院医院,通过混合效应多层模型将术前和术后患者手术曲线下面积分别提高到0.75和0.76。结论:仅根据患者和手术变量,心脏手术后血管加压素给药只能预测较差的准确性。血管加压素给药率存在显著的制度差异,似乎与测量的患者和手术因素无关,当考虑到这一点时,预测能力大大提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信