Time Course of Motor Improvement by Epidural Stimulation After Spinal Cord Injury: An Interim Analysis of a Phase II Trial.

IF 2.8 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Central Nervous System Disease Pub Date : 2025-09-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11795735251379220
Porceban Mm, Angelin Lg, Gabana E, Prota C, De Byase Mem, Ferreira Rjr, Marcon Rm, Cristante Af, Greve Jmd, Arévalo A, Sitthinamsunwan B, Majeed N, Jarernpratumdee K, Charles H, Lepski Ga
{"title":"Time Course of Motor Improvement by Epidural Stimulation After Spinal Cord Injury: An Interim Analysis of a Phase II Trial.","authors":"Porceban Mm, Angelin Lg, Gabana E, Prota C, De Byase Mem, Ferreira Rjr, Marcon Rm, Cristante Af, Greve Jmd, Arévalo A, Sitthinamsunwan B, Majeed N, Jarernpratumdee K, Charles H, Lepski Ga","doi":"10.1177/11795735251379220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Epidural spinal cord stimulation (EES) is a promising intervention for motor rehabilitation after spinal cord injury (SCI), but the extent and trajectory of motor recovery remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This phase II trial evaluates the acquisition of voluntary movements in paraplegic patients (ASIA A or B) following SCI, assessed by the Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity (FMA-LE) score and electromyography (EMG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This interim analysis includes five patients implanted with EES and followed for 12 months. The primary outcome was motor recovery, measured by FMA-LE and EMG. Secondary outcomes included balance (Berg Balance Scale), spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale), pain, autonomic functions, mood, quality of life (WHO-QOL), and safety. Adverse events were monitored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FMA-LE score improved from 36 ± 9 (SD) to 55 ± 2 at 3 months (<i>P</i> < 0.05), 59 ± 2 at 6 months (<i>P</i> < 0.05), and 64 ± 4 at 12 months (<i>P</i> < 0.05). EMG confirmed increased voluntary activation. Balance and spasticity improved, while pain and autonomic functions remained unchanged. Motor gains plateaued after 5 months, reaching 68% above baseline. No serious adverse events occurred, though minor complications included transient nociceptive pain and a self-resolving pressure ulcer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings support the role of EES in facilitating early motor recovery in SCI patients, consistent with prior studies. However, the plateau effect suggests a limit to long-term gains. Future research should explore strategies to sustain improvements, including regenerative therapies or optimized neuromodulation protocols.<b>Trial registration number:</b> NCT06847295.</p>","PeriodicalId":15218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Central Nervous System Disease","volume":"17 ","pages":"11795735251379220"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12454953/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Central Nervous System Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795735251379220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Epidural spinal cord stimulation (EES) is a promising intervention for motor rehabilitation after spinal cord injury (SCI), but the extent and trajectory of motor recovery remain unclear.

Objective: This phase II trial evaluates the acquisition of voluntary movements in paraplegic patients (ASIA A or B) following SCI, assessed by the Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity (FMA-LE) score and electromyography (EMG).

Methods: This interim analysis includes five patients implanted with EES and followed for 12 months. The primary outcome was motor recovery, measured by FMA-LE and EMG. Secondary outcomes included balance (Berg Balance Scale), spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale), pain, autonomic functions, mood, quality of life (WHO-QOL), and safety. Adverse events were monitored.

Results: The FMA-LE score improved from 36 ± 9 (SD) to 55 ± 2 at 3 months (P < 0.05), 59 ± 2 at 6 months (P < 0.05), and 64 ± 4 at 12 months (P < 0.05). EMG confirmed increased voluntary activation. Balance and spasticity improved, while pain and autonomic functions remained unchanged. Motor gains plateaued after 5 months, reaching 68% above baseline. No serious adverse events occurred, though minor complications included transient nociceptive pain and a self-resolving pressure ulcer.

Conclusions: These findings support the role of EES in facilitating early motor recovery in SCI patients, consistent with prior studies. However, the plateau effect suggests a limit to long-term gains. Future research should explore strategies to sustain improvements, including regenerative therapies or optimized neuromodulation protocols.Trial registration number: NCT06847295.

脊髓损伤后硬膜外刺激改善运动的时间过程:一项II期试验的中期分析。
背景:硬膜外脊髓刺激(EES)是脊髓损伤(SCI)后运动康复的一种有希望的干预措施,但运动恢复的程度和轨迹尚不清楚。目的:这项II期试验通过Fugl-Meyer下肢(FMA-LE)评分和肌电图(EMG)评估脊髓损伤后截瘫患者(ASIA A或B)自主运动的获得性。方法:该中期分析包括5例植入EES的患者,随访12个月。主要终点是运动恢复,通过FMA-LE和肌电图测量。次要结果包括平衡(Berg平衡量表)、痉挛(改良Ashworth量表)、疼痛、自主神经功能、情绪、生活质量(WHO-QOL)和安全性。监测不良事件。结果:FMA-LE评分从3个月时的36±9 (SD)提高到55±2 (P < 0.05), 6个月时的59±2 (P < 0.05), 12个月时的64±4 (P < 0.05)。肌电图证实自发性活动增加。平衡和痉挛得到改善,而疼痛和自主神经功能保持不变。5个月后,运动增益趋于平稳,比基线高出68%。没有严重的不良事件发生,虽然轻微的并发症包括短暂的痛觉性疼痛和自行解决的压疮。结论:这些发现支持EES在促进SCI患者早期运动恢复中的作用,与先前的研究一致。然而,平台效应表明,长期收益是有限的。未来的研究应该探索持续改善的策略,包括再生疗法或优化的神经调节方案。试验注册号:NCT06847295。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信