Intra-arterial Chemotherapy for Retinoblastoma: Real-world Experience.

Q3 Medicine
International Ophthalmology Clinics Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-25 DOI:10.1097/IIO.0000000000000591
Abhishek Das, Kothapally Saiteja, Parag K Shah, Prema Subramaniam, Narendran Venkatapathy
{"title":"Intra-arterial Chemotherapy for Retinoblastoma: Real-world Experience.","authors":"Abhishek Das, Kothapally Saiteja, Parag K Shah, Prema Subramaniam, Narendran Venkatapathy","doi":"10.1097/IIO.0000000000000591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) has emerged as a standard of care for retinoblastoma (RB). Our study evaluates the outcomes, adverse effects and challenges of IAC in the management of RB in an Indian cohort. This retrospective study analyzed 20 patients (n=21 eyes) with RB treated with IAC at a single tertiary center. Drugs used were melphalan (5/7.5 mg) and topotecan (1/2 mg) (n=14) or melphalan (5 mg) alone (n=3) or triple therapy, which included carboplatin (30 mg) along with these drugs (n=4). Patient demographics, clinical staging, globe salvage rates, tumor regression, adverse effects, and challenges were assessed. Eyes were classified according to ICRB as group B (n=5), C (n=1), D (n=7), and E (n=8). Of the 21 eyes treated, successful globe salvage was achieved in 81% of the cases, with a median follow-up of 20 months. Complete regression of the main tumor was seen in 12 eyes (57%) and partial regression in 9 eyes (43%). Among adverse effects, vitreous hemorrhage (n=3), rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (n=3), choroidal ischemia (n=1), isolated subretinal hemorrhage (n=2), retinal pigment epithelium degeneration (n=3), ophthalmic artery stenosis (n=2), occlusive vasculitis (n=1), forehead pigmentation in 1 patient, 1 had third nerve palsy with complete ptosis and 1 had 30-degree exotropia. IAC is an effective treatment modality for RB, achieving high globe salvage rates, but parallelly, the adverse effects associated with IAC should be kept in mind. This study provides critical insights into the real-world application of IAC in resource-limited settings, highlighting both its promise and limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14338,"journal":{"name":"International Ophthalmology Clinics","volume":"65 4","pages":"60-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Ophthalmology Clinics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IIO.0000000000000591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) has emerged as a standard of care for retinoblastoma (RB). Our study evaluates the outcomes, adverse effects and challenges of IAC in the management of RB in an Indian cohort. This retrospective study analyzed 20 patients (n=21 eyes) with RB treated with IAC at a single tertiary center. Drugs used were melphalan (5/7.5 mg) and topotecan (1/2 mg) (n=14) or melphalan (5 mg) alone (n=3) or triple therapy, which included carboplatin (30 mg) along with these drugs (n=4). Patient demographics, clinical staging, globe salvage rates, tumor regression, adverse effects, and challenges were assessed. Eyes were classified according to ICRB as group B (n=5), C (n=1), D (n=7), and E (n=8). Of the 21 eyes treated, successful globe salvage was achieved in 81% of the cases, with a median follow-up of 20 months. Complete regression of the main tumor was seen in 12 eyes (57%) and partial regression in 9 eyes (43%). Among adverse effects, vitreous hemorrhage (n=3), rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (n=3), choroidal ischemia (n=1), isolated subretinal hemorrhage (n=2), retinal pigment epithelium degeneration (n=3), ophthalmic artery stenosis (n=2), occlusive vasculitis (n=1), forehead pigmentation in 1 patient, 1 had third nerve palsy with complete ptosis and 1 had 30-degree exotropia. IAC is an effective treatment modality for RB, achieving high globe salvage rates, but parallelly, the adverse effects associated with IAC should be kept in mind. This study provides critical insights into the real-world application of IAC in resource-limited settings, highlighting both its promise and limitations.

视网膜母细胞瘤的动脉化疗:真实世界的经验。
动脉内化疗(IAC)已成为视网膜母细胞瘤(RB)的标准治疗方法。我们的研究评估了印度队列中IAC在RB管理中的结果、不良反应和挑战。本回顾性研究分析了20例(n=21眼)在单一三级中心采用IAC治疗的RB患者。使用的药物是美法兰(5/7.5 mg)和拓扑替康(1/2 mg) (n=14)或美法兰(5 mg)单独(n=3)或三联治疗,其中包括卡铂(30 mg)和这些药物(n=4)。评估了患者人口统计学、临床分期、全球挽救率、肿瘤消退、不良反应和挑战。根据ICRB将眼睛分为B组(n=5)、C组(n=1)、D组(n=7)、E组(n=8)。在接受治疗的21只眼睛中,81%的病例成功挽救了眼球,中位随访时间为20个月。主要肿瘤完全消退12眼(57%),部分消退9眼(43%)。不良反应包括玻璃体出血(3例)、孔源性视网膜脱离(3例)、脉络膜缺血(1例)、孤立性视网膜下出血(2例)、视网膜色素上皮变性(3例)、眼动脉狭窄(2例)、闭塞性血管炎(1例)、前额色素沉着1例、第三神经麻痹伴完全性上睑下垂1例、30度外斜视1例。IAC是RB的一种有效治疗方式,具有较高的全球挽救率,但同时,IAC相关的不良反应也应铭记在心。本研究为IAC在资源有限环境下的实际应用提供了重要的见解,突出了其前景和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Ophthalmology Clinics
International Ophthalmology Clinics Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: International Ophthalmology Clinics is a valuable resource for any medical professional seeking to stay informed and up-to-date regarding developments in this dynamic specialty. Each issue of this quarterly publication presents a comprehensive review of a single topic in a new or changing area of ophthalmology. The timely, tightly focused review articles found in this publication give ophthalmologists the opportunity to benefit from the knowledge of leading experts in this rapidly changing field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信