Development and preliminary validation of a cognitive-physical frailty index in an older adult cohort: The NEDICES study.

IF 0.9 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Carlos Felipe Rengifo Rodas, Félix Bermejo-Pareja, Jesús López-Arrieta, Julián Benito-León
{"title":"Development and preliminary validation of a cognitive-physical frailty index in an older adult cohort: The NEDICES study.","authors":"Carlos Felipe Rengifo Rodas, Félix Bermejo-Pareja, Jesús López-Arrieta, Julián Benito-León","doi":"10.1177/14782715251369601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frailty is a multidimensional syndrome characterised by reduced physiological reserve and increased vulnerability to adverse health outcomes. While traditional frailty models focus primarily on physical decline, emerging evidence supports the integration of cognitive domains for a more comprehensive assessment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and preliminarily validate a cognitive-physical frailty index using data from a large, prospective population-based cohort of older adults in central Spain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We constructed a frailty index based on 12 variables spanning physical, cognitive, subjective, and functional domains. These were selected from the Neurological Disorders in Central Spain (NEDICES) study using criteria based on feasibility, clinical relevance, and prior evidence of mortality prediction. Frailty distributions and transitions were analysed between two time points (1994-1995 and 1997-1998), and mortality risk was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 5,278 participants, the frailty distribution shifted to the right over the 3-year follow-up period, reflecting an increasing vulnerability.. The frailty index demonstrated a strong association with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio = 28.05; 95% CI: 16.37-48.06). Quartile-based stratification illustrated clearly within-sample progression. The index showed high goodness-of-fit under a gamma distribution, supporting its internal coherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This brief, multidimensional frailty index offers a feasible tool for capturing early cognitive and physical decline and predicting short-term mortality in ageing populations. Although preliminary, these findings underscore the value of integrating cognitive indicators into frailty assessment. Future validation in other cohorts and with long-term data is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":46606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh","volume":" ","pages":"14782715251369601"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14782715251369601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Frailty is a multidimensional syndrome characterised by reduced physiological reserve and increased vulnerability to adverse health outcomes. While traditional frailty models focus primarily on physical decline, emerging evidence supports the integration of cognitive domains for a more comprehensive assessment.

Objective: To develop and preliminarily validate a cognitive-physical frailty index using data from a large, prospective population-based cohort of older adults in central Spain.

Methods: We constructed a frailty index based on 12 variables spanning physical, cognitive, subjective, and functional domains. These were selected from the Neurological Disorders in Central Spain (NEDICES) study using criteria based on feasibility, clinical relevance, and prior evidence of mortality prediction. Frailty distributions and transitions were analysed between two time points (1994-1995 and 1997-1998), and mortality risk was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: Among the 5,278 participants, the frailty distribution shifted to the right over the 3-year follow-up period, reflecting an increasing vulnerability.. The frailty index demonstrated a strong association with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio = 28.05; 95% CI: 16.37-48.06). Quartile-based stratification illustrated clearly within-sample progression. The index showed high goodness-of-fit under a gamma distribution, supporting its internal coherence.

Conclusion: This brief, multidimensional frailty index offers a feasible tool for capturing early cognitive and physical decline and predicting short-term mortality in ageing populations. Although preliminary, these findings underscore the value of integrating cognitive indicators into frailty assessment. Future validation in other cohorts and with long-term data is warranted.

在老年人队列中开发和初步验证认知-身体虚弱指数:ne迪斯研究。
背景:虚弱是一种多维综合征,其特征是生理储备减少,对不良健康结果的脆弱性增加。虽然传统的虚弱模型主要关注身体衰退,但新出现的证据支持认知领域的整合,以进行更全面的评估。目的:利用来自西班牙中部老年人的大型前瞻性人群队列数据,开发并初步验证认知-身体虚弱指数。方法:基于身体、认知、主观和功能领域的12个变量构建了一个脆弱指数。这些是从西班牙中部神经系统疾病(ne迪斯)研究中选择的,使用的标准是基于可行性、临床相关性和死亡率预测的先前证据。分析了两个时间点(1994-1995年和1997-1998年)之间的脆弱性分布和转变,并使用Cox比例风险模型评估了死亡风险。结果:在5278名参与者中,衰弱分布在3年随访期间向右移动,反映了脆弱性的增加。虚弱指数显示与全因死亡率有很强的相关性(危险比= 28.05;95% CI: 16.37-48.06)。基于四分位数的分层清楚地说明了样本内的进展。该指数在伽马分布下表现出较高的拟合优度,支持其内部一致性。结论:这个简短的多维脆弱性指数为捕捉早期认知和身体衰退以及预测老龄化人口的短期死亡率提供了一个可行的工具。虽然是初步的,但这些发现强调了将认知指标纳入脆弱性评估的价值。需要在其他队列和长期数据中进行进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh (JRCPE) is the College’s quarterly, peer-reviewed journal, with an international circulation of 8,000. It has three main emphases – clinical medicine, education and medical history. The online JRCPE provides full access to the contents of the print journal and has a number of additional features including advance online publication of recently accepted papers, an online archive, online-only papers, online symposia abstracts, and a series of topic-specific supplements, primarily based on the College’s consensus conferences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信