Technology-based substance use interventions for emerging adults and college students: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Audrey Hang Hai, Laura Curran, Jocelyn N Simons, Kate B Carey, Patrick S Bordnick
{"title":"Technology-based substance use interventions for emerging adults and college students: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Audrey Hang Hai, Laura Curran, Jocelyn N Simons, Kate B Carey, Patrick S Bordnick","doi":"10.1007/s11469-024-01433-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To synthesize randomized controlled trial evidence on technology-based interventions' (TBIs) effectiveness for substance use among emerging adults (EA)/college students (CS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine electronic databases were searched. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed evidence quality. We used robust variance estimation in meta-regression for effect size synthesis and moderator analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on 130 studies, the overall between-group effect size was 0.23 (95% CI= 0.18, 0.28). The effect sizes for comparing TBIs with no treatment, standard care, and non-technology interventions were 0.25 (CI=0.19, 0.31), 0.23 (CI=0.15, 0.32), and 0.12 (CI= -0.02, 0.25), respectively. Older participants showed significantly larger effect sizes, and interventions using multiple technologies had larger effects than smartphone-based ones.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TBIs are effective in reducing substance use in EA/CS, with outcomes comparable to non-technology interventions and advantages over no treatment and standard care. Future research should address drug-related outcomes, multi-technology approaches, age-appropriate designs, and cultural diversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":14083,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-024-01433-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To synthesize randomized controlled trial evidence on technology-based interventions' (TBIs) effectiveness for substance use among emerging adults (EA)/college students (CS).

Methods: Nine electronic databases were searched. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed evidence quality. We used robust variance estimation in meta-regression for effect size synthesis and moderator analysis.

Results: Based on 130 studies, the overall between-group effect size was 0.23 (95% CI= 0.18, 0.28). The effect sizes for comparing TBIs with no treatment, standard care, and non-technology interventions were 0.25 (CI=0.19, 0.31), 0.23 (CI=0.15, 0.32), and 0.12 (CI= -0.02, 0.25), respectively. Older participants showed significantly larger effect sizes, and interventions using multiple technologies had larger effects than smartphone-based ones.

Conclusion: TBIs are effective in reducing substance use in EA/CS, with outcomes comparable to non-technology interventions and advantages over no treatment and standard care. Future research should address drug-related outcomes, multi-technology approaches, age-appropriate designs, and cultural diversity.

新兴成人和大学生基于技术的物质使用干预:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:综合技术干预(tbi)对新兴成人(EA)/大学生(CS)药物使用的有效性的随机对照试验证据。方法:检索9个电子数据库。两位审稿人独立筛选研究、提取数据并评估证据质量。我们在meta回归中使用稳健方差估计进行效应大小综合和调节分析。结果:基于130项研究,总体组间效应大小为0.23 (95% CI= 0.18, 0.28)。比较无治疗、标准护理和非技术干预的tbi的效应量分别为0.25 (CI=0.19, 0.31)、0.23 (CI=0.15, 0.32)和0.12 (CI= -0.02, 0.25)。年龄较大的参与者表现出明显更大的效应,使用多种技术的干预比基于智能手机的干预效果更大。结论:脑外伤可有效减少EA/CS患者的药物使用,其结果与非技术干预相当,优于无治疗和标准护理。未来的研究应关注与药物相关的结果、多技术方法、适合年龄的设计和文化多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
2.50%
发文量
245
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mental Health and Addictions (IJMH) is a publication that specializes in presenting the latest research, policies, causes, literature reviews, prevention, and treatment of mental health and addiction-related topics. It focuses on mental health, substance addictions, behavioral addictions, as well as concurrent mental health and addictive disorders. By publishing peer-reviewed articles of high quality, the journal aims to spark an international discussion on issues related to mental health and addiction and to offer valuable insights into how these conditions impact individuals, families, and societies. The journal covers a wide range of fields, including psychology, sociology, anthropology, criminology, public health, psychiatry, history, and law. It publishes various types of articles, including feature articles, review articles, clinical notes, research notes, letters to the editor, and commentaries. The journal is published six times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信