Ease pediatric emergency department crowding in Switzerland with high-quality telephone triage: a prospective multicenter study.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Frontiers in Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-09-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fped.2025.1634841
Krisztina Schmitz-Grosz, Carsten Sommer-Meyer, Stéphanie van der Lely, Siro Fritzmann, Georg Staubli, Eva Berger-Olah
{"title":"Ease pediatric emergency department crowding in Switzerland with high-quality telephone triage: a prospective multicenter study.","authors":"Krisztina Schmitz-Grosz, Carsten Sommer-Meyer, Stéphanie van der Lely, Siro Fritzmann, Georg Staubli, Eva Berger-Olah","doi":"10.3389/fped.2025.1634841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This is the first study evaluating the picture of a pediatric telephone triage service's (PTTS) quality from the hospital, telemedical, and patient perspective, to provide a deeper understanding of its contribution to the relief of pediatric emergency burden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective multicenter study from April 3 to May 15, 2023. All calls to the Medgate Kids Line of six hospitals providing pediatric emergency care in German-speaking Switzerland were included. Following telemedical counselling, patients were advised to visit a pediatric emergency department (PED) or a primary care provider (PCP) or were treated telemedically by the Kids Line team. Patients presenting to participating PEDs after calling were evaluated by a hospital triage specialist (HTS) to define telemedical triage's appropriateness [appropriate triage, undertriage (safety), overtriage (efficiency); hospital perspective]. Only PED presentations evaluated as undertriage or overtriage were peer-reviewed (telemedical perspective), while appropriate triages were adopted. Additionally, patients' intention, adherence and satisfaction were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 4,061 calls. 24.9% cases were advised to go to a PED, 20.7% to a PCP, and 54.3% were allocated to telemedicine. HTSs evaluated 556 cases. The PTTS appropriately triaged 78.2% of cases according to the hospital perspective (undertriage: 8.1%; overtriage: 13.7%). After telemedical peer-review overall appropriateness was 91.7% (undertriage: 3.8%; overtriage: 4.5%). 606 patients provided feedback. Without PTTS, 76.9% would have consulted face-to-face medical care (PED: 60.6%). Adherence to triage recommendation was mostly high (PED: 84.1%; PCP: 23.3%; Telemedicine: 83.5%). Net promoter score was high (48.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This PTTS (>100,000 calls/year) based on clinical expertise and guidelines is appropriate, safe, efficient, and patient-satisfactory and prevents a considerably high percentage of patients from visiting a PED. While patient adherence to triage recommendations \"PED\" and \"Telemedicine\" was high, lower adherence to PCP referrals might be explained by deviations in parents' perception of acuity, and/or limited PCP availability (at out-of-office hours). Triage appropriateness varied across perspectives. Incorporating such high-quality PTTSs into further regions of Switzerland may help alleviate the burden on the healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":12637,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","volume":"13 ","pages":"1634841"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12455728/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2025.1634841","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This is the first study evaluating the picture of a pediatric telephone triage service's (PTTS) quality from the hospital, telemedical, and patient perspective, to provide a deeper understanding of its contribution to the relief of pediatric emergency burden.

Methods: We conducted a prospective multicenter study from April 3 to May 15, 2023. All calls to the Medgate Kids Line of six hospitals providing pediatric emergency care in German-speaking Switzerland were included. Following telemedical counselling, patients were advised to visit a pediatric emergency department (PED) or a primary care provider (PCP) or were treated telemedically by the Kids Line team. Patients presenting to participating PEDs after calling were evaluated by a hospital triage specialist (HTS) to define telemedical triage's appropriateness [appropriate triage, undertriage (safety), overtriage (efficiency); hospital perspective]. Only PED presentations evaluated as undertriage or overtriage were peer-reviewed (telemedical perspective), while appropriate triages were adopted. Additionally, patients' intention, adherence and satisfaction were assessed.

Results: We included 4,061 calls. 24.9% cases were advised to go to a PED, 20.7% to a PCP, and 54.3% were allocated to telemedicine. HTSs evaluated 556 cases. The PTTS appropriately triaged 78.2% of cases according to the hospital perspective (undertriage: 8.1%; overtriage: 13.7%). After telemedical peer-review overall appropriateness was 91.7% (undertriage: 3.8%; overtriage: 4.5%). 606 patients provided feedback. Without PTTS, 76.9% would have consulted face-to-face medical care (PED: 60.6%). Adherence to triage recommendation was mostly high (PED: 84.1%; PCP: 23.3%; Telemedicine: 83.5%). Net promoter score was high (48.5).

Conclusion: This PTTS (>100,000 calls/year) based on clinical expertise and guidelines is appropriate, safe, efficient, and patient-satisfactory and prevents a considerably high percentage of patients from visiting a PED. While patient adherence to triage recommendations "PED" and "Telemedicine" was high, lower adherence to PCP referrals might be explained by deviations in parents' perception of acuity, and/or limited PCP availability (at out-of-office hours). Triage appropriateness varied across perspectives. Incorporating such high-quality PTTSs into further regions of Switzerland may help alleviate the burden on the healthcare system.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

用高质量电话分诊缓解瑞士儿科急诊科拥挤:一项前瞻性多中心研究
这是第一个从医院、远程医疗和患者的角度评估儿科电话分诊服务(PTTS)质量的研究,旨在更深入地了解其对减轻儿科急诊负担的贡献。方法:我们于2023年4月3日至5月15日进行了一项前瞻性多中心研究。在瑞士德语区提供儿科急诊护理的六家医院的Medgate儿童热线的所有电话都被纳入其中。在进行远程医疗咨询后,建议患者去儿科急诊科(PED)或初级保健提供者(PCP)就诊,或由儿童热线团队进行远程医疗治疗。呼叫后就诊于参与的儿科医生的患者由医院分诊专家(HTS)评估,以确定远程医疗分诊的适当性[适当分诊、分诊不足(安全)、分诊过度(效率);医院的角度)。只有被评估为分流不足或分流过度的PED报告被同行评审(远程医疗角度),而适当的分流被采用。此外,还评估了患者的意愿、依从性和满意度。结果:我们纳入了4061个电话。24.9%的患者被建议去PED, 20.7%的患者被建议去PCP, 54.3%的患者被分配到远程医疗。HTSs评估了556例病例。PTTS根据医院的观点对78.2%的病例进行了适当的分类(分类不足:8.1%;分类过度:13.7%)。远程医疗同行评议后,总体适宜性为91.7%(分流不足:3.8%;分流过度:4.5%)。606例患者提供反馈。如果没有PTTS, 76.9%的人会寻求面对面的医疗服务(PED: 60.6%)。对分诊建议的依从性大多较高(PED: 84.1%; PCP: 23.3%;远程医疗:83.5%)。净推荐值较高(48.5)。结论:这种基于临床专业知识和指南的PTTS(每年10万次呼叫)是适当的、安全的、有效的、患者满意的,并且可以防止相当高比例的患者访问PED。虽然患者对分诊建议“PED”和“远程医疗”的依从性很高,但对PCP转诊的依从性较低可能是由于家长对视力的感知偏差和/或PCP可用性有限(在非办公时间)。分诊的适当性因观点而异。将这种高质量的PTTSs纳入瑞士的其他地区可能有助于减轻医疗保健系统的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Pediatrics
Frontiers in Pediatrics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
2132
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Pediatrics (Impact Factor 2.33) publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research broadly across the field, from basic to clinical research that meets ongoing challenges in pediatric patient care and child health. Field Chief Editors Arjan Te Pas at Leiden University and Michael L. Moritz at the Children''s Hospital of Pittsburgh are supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. Frontiers in Pediatrics also features Research Topics, Frontiers special theme-focused issues managed by Guest Associate Editors, addressing important areas in pediatrics. In this fashion, Frontiers serves as an outlet to publish the broadest aspects of pediatrics in both basic and clinical research, including high-quality reviews, case reports, editorials and commentaries related to all aspects of pediatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信