Responses to listening difficulty in in-person conversation: a survey-based synthesis of communication strategies used by people with hearing loss, communication partners, and hearing-care professionals.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Gemma Perfect, Karolina Smeds, Antje Heinrich, Gabrielle H Saunders
{"title":"Responses to listening difficulty in in-person conversation: a survey-based synthesis of communication strategies used by people with hearing loss, communication partners, and hearing-care professionals.","authors":"Gemma Perfect, Karolina Smeds, Antje Heinrich, Gabrielle H Saunders","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2025.2558689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore communication strategies employed or recommended in everyday listening situations by people with hearing loss (PHL), communication partners (CPs), and healthcare professionals (HCPs), and to evaluate which strategies the groups thought were most helpful for PHL.</p><p><strong>Design and study sample: </strong>An online survey with open-ended questions was completed by 95 PHL, 49 CPs, and 86 HCPs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Qualitative analyses of responses were conducted. Responses from PHL and CPs were inductively coded. Codes were combined into categories and subcategories. Next, the responses of HCPs were analysed deductively using the categories and subcategories identified in the PHL and CP data. These analyses were then used to develop themes and a framework for understanding how PHL and CPs manage hearing difficulties. The four themes are: \"Signal,\" \"Repair,\" \"Relations,\" and \"Preparation and Recuperation.\" Some strategies were identified as being used but not helpful, and vice versa. There was sometimes a disconnect between strategies PHL find helpful and the extent to which they request others use them.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This framework for understanding the perspectives of three key stakeholder groups on the use of communication strategies will be used to develop evidence-based rehabilitation/counselling programs for PHL.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2025.2558689","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore communication strategies employed or recommended in everyday listening situations by people with hearing loss (PHL), communication partners (CPs), and healthcare professionals (HCPs), and to evaluate which strategies the groups thought were most helpful for PHL.

Design and study sample: An online survey with open-ended questions was completed by 95 PHL, 49 CPs, and 86 HCPs.

Results: Qualitative analyses of responses were conducted. Responses from PHL and CPs were inductively coded. Codes were combined into categories and subcategories. Next, the responses of HCPs were analysed deductively using the categories and subcategories identified in the PHL and CP data. These analyses were then used to develop themes and a framework for understanding how PHL and CPs manage hearing difficulties. The four themes are: "Signal," "Repair," "Relations," and "Preparation and Recuperation." Some strategies were identified as being used but not helpful, and vice versa. There was sometimes a disconnect between strategies PHL find helpful and the extent to which they request others use them.

Conclusions: This framework for understanding the perspectives of three key stakeholder groups on the use of communication strategies will be used to develop evidence-based rehabilitation/counselling programs for PHL.

面对面谈话中对听力困难的反应:一项基于调查的听力损失者、沟通伙伴和听力保健专业人员使用的沟通策略综合研究。
目的:探讨听力损失人群(PHL)、沟通伙伴(CPs)和医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)在日常听力环境中使用或推荐的沟通策略,并评价他们认为哪些策略对PHL最有帮助。设计和研究样本:95名PHL、49名CPs和86名HCPs完成了一项带有开放式问题的在线调查。结果:对调查结果进行定性分析。对PHL和CPs的反应进行归纳编码。代码被合并为类别和子类别。接下来,使用PHL和CP数据中确定的类别和子类别对HCPs的反应进行演绎分析。然后,这些分析被用于开发主题和框架,以了解PHL和cp如何处理听力困难。四个主题分别是:“信号”、“修复”、“关系”和“准备与恢复”。有些策略被认为是有用的,但没有帮助,反之亦然。有时候,PHL认为有用的策略与他们要求别人使用这些策略的程度之间存在脱节。结论:这个理解三个关键利益相关者群体在使用沟通策略方面的观点的框架将用于开发基于证据的PHL康复/咨询项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信