A Bottom-Up Classification of Wheelchair Users Based on Propulsion Kinematics Beyond Injury Level: Exploratory Findings

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Hyunji Kim;San Hong;Woojin Park;Jooeun Ahn
{"title":"A Bottom-Up Classification of Wheelchair Users Based on Propulsion Kinematics Beyond Injury Level: Exploratory Findings","authors":"Hyunji Kim;San Hong;Woojin Park;Jooeun Ahn","doi":"10.1109/TNSRE.2025.3613726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wheelchair propulsion is critical for the health and quality of life of wheelchair users. However, previous studies have primarily focused on quantitative comparisons of propulsion patterns among individuals with different injury levels without considering other factors. This study aims to explore distinct wheelchair propulsion strategies among individuals with spinal cord injury using a bottom-up approach based on kinematic patterns, and to investigate how these strategies relate to injury level, physical activity (PA) level, and coordination. Twenty-eight wheelchair users performed propulsion as fast as possible on an ergometer. Joint kinematics were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) to cluster participants. Muscle synergy analysis was performed using non-negative matrix factorization of electromyography data from six upper limb muscles. Three distinct clusters were identified, with differences primarily in PA levels (p = 0.02) and wheelchair use experience (p = 0.04) rather than injury level. Cluster 1 (n = 4), characterized by longer wheelchair use experience and higher PA levels, demonstrated higher hand velocity (p = 0.01) and longer push phase percentage (p < 0.01), with distinct joint coordination patterns consistent with relatively efficient propulsion strategies. Clusters 3 (n = 12) with less physical activity levels showed conservative propulsion patterns, and exhibited significantly lower hand velocity. Muscle synergy analysis revealed differences in neuromuscular control, particularly in the timing and coordination during push phase. Our findings suggest that wheelchair propulsion strategies are influenced more by experience and PA level than by the injury level alone. This highlights the importance of promoting PA and systematic propulsion training in rehabilitation programs to enhance wheelchair users’ mobility and independence.","PeriodicalId":13419,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering","volume":"33 ","pages":"3878-3887"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11177588","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11177588/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wheelchair propulsion is critical for the health and quality of life of wheelchair users. However, previous studies have primarily focused on quantitative comparisons of propulsion patterns among individuals with different injury levels without considering other factors. This study aims to explore distinct wheelchair propulsion strategies among individuals with spinal cord injury using a bottom-up approach based on kinematic patterns, and to investigate how these strategies relate to injury level, physical activity (PA) level, and coordination. Twenty-eight wheelchair users performed propulsion as fast as possible on an ergometer. Joint kinematics were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) to cluster participants. Muscle synergy analysis was performed using non-negative matrix factorization of electromyography data from six upper limb muscles. Three distinct clusters were identified, with differences primarily in PA levels (p = 0.02) and wheelchair use experience (p = 0.04) rather than injury level. Cluster 1 (n = 4), characterized by longer wheelchair use experience and higher PA levels, demonstrated higher hand velocity (p = 0.01) and longer push phase percentage (p < 0.01), with distinct joint coordination patterns consistent with relatively efficient propulsion strategies. Clusters 3 (n = 12) with less physical activity levels showed conservative propulsion patterns, and exhibited significantly lower hand velocity. Muscle synergy analysis revealed differences in neuromuscular control, particularly in the timing and coordination during push phase. Our findings suggest that wheelchair propulsion strategies are influenced more by experience and PA level than by the injury level alone. This highlights the importance of promoting PA and systematic propulsion training in rehabilitation programs to enhance wheelchair users’ mobility and independence.
基于超越损伤水平的推进运动学的自下而上的轮椅使用者分类:探索性发现。
轮椅推进对轮椅使用者的健康和生活质量至关重要。然而,以前的研究主要集中在不同损伤程度个体之间推进模式的定量比较上,而没有考虑其他因素。本研究旨在利用基于运动学模式的自下而上方法探索脊髓损伤患者不同的轮椅推进策略,并研究这些策略与损伤程度、身体活动(PA)水平和协调性之间的关系。28名轮椅使用者在测力计上尽可能快地进行推进。采用主成分分析(PCA)对参与者进行聚类分析。采用非负矩阵分解对六块上肢肌肉的肌电图数据进行肌肉协同分析。确定了三个不同的集群,差异主要在PA水平(p = 0.02)和轮椅使用经验(p = 0.04),而不是损伤水平。集群1 (n=4)轮椅使用经验越长,PA水平越高,手速度越快(p = 0.01),推相百分比越高(p < 0.01),关节协调模式明显,与相对高效的推进策略一致。运动水平较低的群集3 (n=12)表现出保守的推进模式,手速度明显较低。肌肉协同分析揭示了神经肌肉控制的差异,特别是在推动阶段的时间和协调方面。我们的研究结果表明,轮椅推进策略更多地受到经验和PA水平的影响,而不是单独受到损伤水平的影响。这突出了在康复计划中促进PA和系统推进训练的重要性,以提高轮椅使用者的行动能力和独立性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
8.20%
发文量
479
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rehabilitative and neural aspects of biomedical engineering, including functional electrical stimulation, acoustic dynamics, human performance measurement and analysis, nerve stimulation, electromyography, motor control and stimulation; and hardware and software applications for rehabilitation engineering and assistive devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信