Effect of continuous cropping on bacterial and fungal communities in Glehnia littoralis soil.

IF 3.1 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Zhengpu Rong, Jingqiao Zhao, Weihong Shi, Yuguang Zheng, Huigai Sun, Xiaoying Shang, Xiaowei Han
{"title":"Effect of continuous cropping on bacterial and fungal communities in Glehnia littoralis soil.","authors":"Zhengpu Rong, Jingqiao Zhao, Weihong Shi, Yuguang Zheng, Huigai Sun, Xiaoying Shang, Xiaowei Han","doi":"10.1007/s12223-025-01311-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rhizosphere soil microorganisms are critical in the plant's growth and soil health. Continuous cropping had significant effects on rhizosphere soil microbial community. This study used Glehnia littoralis of 1-year (primary soil, FS), 2-year (continuous cropping soil, CS), and 0-year (Fallow, control soil, CK) soils as test materials, and used high-throughput sequencing technology to study the effects of continuous cropping on the composition, structure, and diversity of microbial communities in the rhizosphere soil of Glehnia littoralis. The results indicate that Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, and Actinobacteria were the dominant bacteria, the relative abundance of Actinobacteria and Acidobacteria in the bacterial community decreased with the increase of the planting years, which may significantly reduce the microbial diversity and cause the negative effects of continuous cropping of G. littoralis; Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and Zygomycota were dominant phylum fungi. The α-diversity of fungi in CS was significantly lower than that in other treatments. This study also focuses on soil chemistry and enzymatic activity. pH value, urease activity, and total nitrogen content were higher in the continuous cropping soil. Redundancy analysis showed that soil nutrients, pH value, and urease activity had significant effects on soil fungal and bacterial communities. Significant correlations were detected between soil total nitrogen and urease, and between soil total phosphorus and total potassium. In conclusion, continuous cropping increases soil pH, total nitrogen, and urease activity; decreases fungal diversity; and decreases relative abundance of bacterial dominant bacteria. The interaction and mutual influence of these factors may be the main cause of continuous cropping obstacle of G. littoralis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12346,"journal":{"name":"Folia microbiologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia microbiologica","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-025-01311-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rhizosphere soil microorganisms are critical in the plant's growth and soil health. Continuous cropping had significant effects on rhizosphere soil microbial community. This study used Glehnia littoralis of 1-year (primary soil, FS), 2-year (continuous cropping soil, CS), and 0-year (Fallow, control soil, CK) soils as test materials, and used high-throughput sequencing technology to study the effects of continuous cropping on the composition, structure, and diversity of microbial communities in the rhizosphere soil of Glehnia littoralis. The results indicate that Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, and Actinobacteria were the dominant bacteria, the relative abundance of Actinobacteria and Acidobacteria in the bacterial community decreased with the increase of the planting years, which may significantly reduce the microbial diversity and cause the negative effects of continuous cropping of G. littoralis; Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and Zygomycota were dominant phylum fungi. The α-diversity of fungi in CS was significantly lower than that in other treatments. This study also focuses on soil chemistry and enzymatic activity. pH value, urease activity, and total nitrogen content were higher in the continuous cropping soil. Redundancy analysis showed that soil nutrients, pH value, and urease activity had significant effects on soil fungal and bacterial communities. Significant correlations were detected between soil total nitrogen and urease, and between soil total phosphorus and total potassium. In conclusion, continuous cropping increases soil pH, total nitrogen, and urease activity; decreases fungal diversity; and decreases relative abundance of bacterial dominant bacteria. The interaction and mutual influence of these factors may be the main cause of continuous cropping obstacle of G. littoralis.

连作对滨海格伦草土壤细菌和真菌群落的影响。
根际土壤微生物对植物生长和土壤健康至关重要。连作对根际土壤微生物群落有显著影响。本研究以1年(原生土,FS)、2年(连作土,CS)和0年(休耕,对照土,CK)土壤为试验材料,采用高通量测序技术研究连作对滨草根际土壤微生物群落组成、结构和多样性的影响。结果表明:变形菌门、酸性菌门和放线菌门为优势菌群,放线菌门和酸性菌门在细菌群落中的相对丰度随着种植年限的增加而降低,可能会显著降低微生物多样性,造成连作的负面影响;子囊菌、担子菌和接合菌是真菌的优势门。CS中真菌α-多样性显著低于其他处理。本研究还侧重于土壤化学和酶活性。连作土壤pH值、脲酶活性和全氮含量较高。冗余分析表明,土壤养分、pH值和脲酶活性对土壤真菌和细菌群落有显著影响。土壤全氮与脲酶、全磷与全钾呈显著相关。综上所述,连作增加了土壤pH值、全氮和脲酶活性;减少真菌多样性;降低了优势细菌的相对丰度。这些因素的交互作用和相互影响可能是造成滨草连作障碍的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Folia microbiologica
Folia microbiologica 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Unlike journals which specialize ever more narrowly, Folia Microbiologica (FM) takes an open approach that spans general, soil, medical and industrial microbiology, plus some branches of immunology. This English-language journal publishes original papers, reviews and mini-reviews, short communications and book reviews. The coverage includes cutting-edge methods and promising new topics, as well as studies using established methods that exhibit promise in practical applications such as medicine, animal husbandry and more. The coverage of FM is expanding beyond Central and Eastern Europe, with a growing proportion of its contents contributed by international authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信