Impact of Different Nickel-titanium Instruments on Apical Micro-cracks Formation and Residual Amount of Root Canal Filling Materials Following Retreatment Procedure.

IF 2 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ahmed Witwit, Maha Albazzaz, Baydaa Zidane
{"title":"Impact of Different Nickel-titanium Instruments on Apical Micro-cracks Formation and Residual Amount of Root Canal Filling Materials Following Retreatment Procedure.","authors":"Ahmed Witwit, Maha Albazzaz, Baydaa Zidane","doi":"10.14744/eej.2025.09226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate and compare the dentinal defects caused by three different retreat-ment systems [Endostar RE Endo, XP-endo Retreatment, and MANI Gutta-Percha Removal (GPR)] and to assess the percentage of residual root canal filling material following the retreatment procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty extracted mandibular second premolars with straight oval canals were used. The roots were standardized to a length of 14 mm. All samples were instrumented with NiTi instruments up to size 30.04, then filled using single cone technique with AH plus sealer and gutta-percha. Four groups were created from the samples. Group 1 served as the negative control (n=15), while the remaining three groups (n=15 each) were categorized based on the retreatment system used. Stereomicroscope at magnification 45 x was used to evaluate the incidence of crack formation and propagation at apex of the roots and the residual volume percentage of root filling materials in groups of Endostar RE, MANI GPR, Xp retreatment systems assessed using CBCT. Fisher's exact test was used to analyze the incidence and propagation of cracks, while one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test were applied to assess differences in residual filling material volume among the groups P values at 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There is significance difference (p=0.028) between the Endostar and Xp retreatment system. The highest of dentinal defect (10\\15) with Endostar retreatment system followed by (4\\15) with GPR system and (2\\15) with XP endo retreatment system.Highest residual filling material mean at Endostar RE retreatment system (51.97) and lowest mean (39.07) at Xp retreatment system A statistically significant difference was observed between the groups (p<0.001), particularly between the Endostar and XP retreatment systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No system was capable of completely eliminating obturated materials. The XP-endo Retreat-ment system showed the lowest incidence of crack formation and propagation and proved to be the most effective in removing gutta-percha and sealer.</p>","PeriodicalId":11860,"journal":{"name":"European Endodontic Journal","volume":"10 5","pages":"420-431"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2025.09226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the dentinal defects caused by three different retreat-ment systems [Endostar RE Endo, XP-endo Retreatment, and MANI Gutta-Percha Removal (GPR)] and to assess the percentage of residual root canal filling material following the retreatment procedure.

Methods: Sixty extracted mandibular second premolars with straight oval canals were used. The roots were standardized to a length of 14 mm. All samples were instrumented with NiTi instruments up to size 30.04, then filled using single cone technique with AH plus sealer and gutta-percha. Four groups were created from the samples. Group 1 served as the negative control (n=15), while the remaining three groups (n=15 each) were categorized based on the retreatment system used. Stereomicroscope at magnification 45 x was used to evaluate the incidence of crack formation and propagation at apex of the roots and the residual volume percentage of root filling materials in groups of Endostar RE, MANI GPR, Xp retreatment systems assessed using CBCT. Fisher's exact test was used to analyze the incidence and propagation of cracks, while one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test were applied to assess differences in residual filling material volume among the groups P values at 0.05.

Results: There is significance difference (p=0.028) between the Endostar and Xp retreatment system. The highest of dentinal defect (10\15) with Endostar retreatment system followed by (4\15) with GPR system and (2\15) with XP endo retreatment system.Highest residual filling material mean at Endostar RE retreatment system (51.97) and lowest mean (39.07) at Xp retreatment system A statistically significant difference was observed between the groups (p<0.001), particularly between the Endostar and XP retreatment systems.

Conclusion: No system was capable of completely eliminating obturated materials. The XP-endo Retreat-ment system showed the lowest incidence of crack formation and propagation and proved to be the most effective in removing gutta-percha and sealer.

不同镍钛器械对根尖微裂纹形成及根管充填材料残留量的影响
目的:本研究旨在评估和比较三种不同的退治系统[Endostar RE Endo, XP-endo Retreatment和MANI Gutta-Percha Removal (GPR)]引起的牙本质缺损,并评估再治过程后残留根管填充材料的百分比。方法:拔除下颌第二前磨牙60颗,采用直椭圆管。根被标准化为14毫米的长度。所有样品均使用尺寸为30.04的NiTi仪器进行检测,然后使用AH加密封剂和杜仲胶的单锥技术进行填充。从这些样本中创建了四组。第1组为阴性对照(n=15),其余3组(n=15)根据所采用的后处理系统进行分类。采用45倍体视显微镜观察根尖裂纹形成和扩展的发生率,以及采用CBCT评估的Endostar RE、MANI GPR和Xp再处理系统各组根充填材料的残留体积百分比。采用Fisher精确检验分析裂缝的发生和扩展,采用单因素方差分析和Tukey事后检验评估各组间残余填充材料体积的差异,P值为0.05。结果:Endostar与Xp再处理系统的差异有统计学意义(p=0.028)。Endostar牙本质缺损最大(10\15),其次是GPR牙本质缺损(4\15)和XP牙本质缺损(2\15)。Endostar RE再处理系统剩余填充物平均值最高(51.97),Xp再处理系统最低(39.07),两组间差异有统计学意义(p)。结论:没有一种系统能够完全消除封闭材料。XP-endo回用系统显示出裂缝形成和扩展的最低发生率,并被证明是去除杜胶和密封剂的最有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Endodontic Journal
European Endodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信