Early intervention and augmentation therapy for eating disorders: a Delphi consensus study on transdiagnostic cognitive behavioural processes.

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Jamie-Lee Pennesi, Mia L Pellizzer, Tracey D Wade
{"title":"Early intervention and augmentation therapy for eating disorders: a Delphi consensus study on transdiagnostic cognitive behavioural processes.","authors":"Jamie-Lee Pennesi, Mia L Pellizzer, Tracey D Wade","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2564387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Little is known about which transdiagnostic cognitive behavioural processes (precipitating or maintaining factors across different psychiatric disorders) are most critical to target to improve the outcomes of interventions for eating disorders (EDs). As a first step toward developing a better understanding of this issue, we conducted a modified Delphi study to reach consensus on processes for early intervention and augmenting evidence-based treatment. Across three rounds, four panels were included: people with lived experience (<i>n</i> = 38), significant others (<i>n</i> = 27), clinicians specialising in the treatment of EDs (<i>n</i> = 44), and ED researchers (<i>n</i> = 29). For early intervention, nine processes were endorsed: basing self-worth on one or two aspects of oneself; persistent and excessively high standards; poor distress tolerance skills; being self-critical; negative body image; difficulty coping with developmental life transitions; low self-compassion; low self-worth and self-acceptance; and negative social media use. For augmenting treatment, nine similar processes were endorsed, except life transitions and social media use, which were replaced by social isolation and unhelpful thinking habits. This information can inform a future research agenda for improving interventions for EDs. However, consensus only occurred for approximately one fifth of the 49 processes, with a disconnect between the lived experience and researcher panels that requires attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2564387","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Little is known about which transdiagnostic cognitive behavioural processes (precipitating or maintaining factors across different psychiatric disorders) are most critical to target to improve the outcomes of interventions for eating disorders (EDs). As a first step toward developing a better understanding of this issue, we conducted a modified Delphi study to reach consensus on processes for early intervention and augmenting evidence-based treatment. Across three rounds, four panels were included: people with lived experience (n = 38), significant others (n = 27), clinicians specialising in the treatment of EDs (n = 44), and ED researchers (n = 29). For early intervention, nine processes were endorsed: basing self-worth on one or two aspects of oneself; persistent and excessively high standards; poor distress tolerance skills; being self-critical; negative body image; difficulty coping with developmental life transitions; low self-compassion; low self-worth and self-acceptance; and negative social media use. For augmenting treatment, nine similar processes were endorsed, except life transitions and social media use, which were replaced by social isolation and unhelpful thinking habits. This information can inform a future research agenda for improving interventions for EDs. However, consensus only occurred for approximately one fifth of the 49 processes, with a disconnect between the lived experience and researcher panels that requires attention.

饮食失调的早期干预和强化治疗:跨诊断认知行为过程的德尔菲共识研究。
对于哪些跨诊断认知行为过程(促成或维持不同精神疾病的因素)是改善饮食失调(EDs)干预结果的最关键目标,我们知之甚少。为了更好地理解这一问题,我们进行了一项改进的德尔菲研究,以就早期干预和增强循证治疗的过程达成共识。在三轮调查中,包括四个小组:有生活经验的人(n = 38),重要他人(n = 27),专门治疗ED的临床医生(n = 44)和ED研究人员(n = 29)。对于早期干预,九个过程被认可:将自我价值建立在自我的一个或两个方面;高标准:持久的和过高的标准;痛苦承受能力差;自我批评;消极的身体形象;难以应对发展生活的转变;低自我同情;自我价值感和自我接受度低;消极使用社交媒体。在强化治疗方面,除了生活转变和使用社交媒体之外,其他9个类似的治疗过程也得到了认可,这些过程被社会孤立和无益的思维习惯所取代。这一信息可以为未来改进急诊干预措施的研究议程提供信息。然而,在49个过程中,只有大约五分之一的过程达成了共识,生活经验和研究小组之间的脱节需要引起注意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the application of behavioural and cognitive sciences to clinical psychology and psychotherapy. The journal publishes state-of-the-art scientific articles within: - clinical and health psychology - psychopathology - behavioural medicine - assessment - treatment - theoretical issues pertinent to behavioural, cognitive and combined cognitive behavioural therapies With the number of high quality contributions increasing, the journal has been able to maintain a rapid publication schedule, providing readers with the latest research in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信