Utilization of colorectal cancer screening modalities in the United States (2017-2023): a national multi-payer claims database analysis.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mallik Greene, Shrey Gohil, Brad Stieber, A Burak Ozbay, Quang A Le, Raja Kakuturu, Joseph W LeMaster, Michael Dore, A Mark Fendrick, Joseph C Anderson, Jordan J Karlitz
{"title":"Utilization of colorectal cancer screening modalities in the United States (2017-2023): a national multi-payer claims database analysis.","authors":"Mallik Greene, Shrey Gohil, Brad Stieber, A Burak Ozbay, Quang A Le, Raja Kakuturu, Joseph W LeMaster, Michael Dore, A Mark Fendrick, Joseph C Anderson, Jordan J Karlitz","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2025.2565442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of U.S. cancer mortality. This study evaluated the utilization of CRC screening modalities from 2017 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, cross-sectional study analyzed data from 2017 to 2023 using a national multi-payer claims database, supplemented with laboratory data related to CRC screening. Patients aged 45-75 years, at average risk for CRC, with no prior CRC diagnosis, and who had continuous health insurance enrollment for 24 months (from January 1 of the baseline year to December 31 of the study year) were included. Annual proportions for colonoscopy, multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test, fecal immunochemical test/fecal occult blood test (FIT/FOBT), and other modalities were assessed, along with sociodemographic factors. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used to assess utilization trends across the years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Colonoscopy remained the most commonly used screening modality, with its share increasing slightly from 53.0% in 2017 to 58.7% in 2023. The mt-sDNA test proportion increased significantly from 2.4% in 2017 to 20.4% in 2023, while the proportion of FIT/FOBT declined significantly, from 44% to 20.4%. Similarly, significant age-related shifts in screening utilization were observed, with colonoscopy proportion increasing from 48.1% to 61.6%, mt-sDNA rising from 0.0% to 24.0%, and FIT/FOBT declining from 50.8% to 14.1% in the 45-49 age group from 2017 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CRC screening utilization shifted significantly from 2017 to 2023, with increased colonoscopy and mt-sDNA use and a marked decline in FIT/FOBT. Continued monitoring is critical to ensure equitable access to effective modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2565442","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of U.S. cancer mortality. This study evaluated the utilization of CRC screening modalities from 2017 to 2023.

Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional study analyzed data from 2017 to 2023 using a national multi-payer claims database, supplemented with laboratory data related to CRC screening. Patients aged 45-75 years, at average risk for CRC, with no prior CRC diagnosis, and who had continuous health insurance enrollment for 24 months (from January 1 of the baseline year to December 31 of the study year) were included. Annual proportions for colonoscopy, multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test, fecal immunochemical test/fecal occult blood test (FIT/FOBT), and other modalities were assessed, along with sociodemographic factors. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used to assess utilization trends across the years.

Results: Colonoscopy remained the most commonly used screening modality, with its share increasing slightly from 53.0% in 2017 to 58.7% in 2023. The mt-sDNA test proportion increased significantly from 2.4% in 2017 to 20.4% in 2023, while the proportion of FIT/FOBT declined significantly, from 44% to 20.4%. Similarly, significant age-related shifts in screening utilization were observed, with colonoscopy proportion increasing from 48.1% to 61.6%, mt-sDNA rising from 0.0% to 24.0%, and FIT/FOBT declining from 50.8% to 14.1% in the 45-49 age group from 2017 to 2023.

Conclusion: CRC screening utilization shifted significantly from 2017 to 2023, with increased colonoscopy and mt-sDNA use and a marked decline in FIT/FOBT. Continued monitoring is critical to ensure equitable access to effective modalities.

美国结直肠癌筛查方式的使用(2017-2023):国家多付款人索赔数据库分析
背景:结直肠癌(CRC)是美国癌症相关死亡的第二大原因,筛查在早期发现中起着关键作用。本研究旨在使用一个大型的国家多付款人索赔数据库,估计2017年至2023年使用的CRC筛查方式的比例。方法:这项回顾性横断面研究使用国家多付款人索赔数据库分析了2017年至2023年的数据,并补充了与CRC筛查相关的实验室数据。纳入年龄45-75岁、CRC平均风险、既往无CRC诊断、连续参加健康保险24个月(从基线年1月1日至研究年12月31日)的患者。评估结肠镜检查、多靶点粪便DNA (mt-sDNA)检测、粪便免疫化学测试/粪便隐血测试(FIT/FOBT)和其他方式的年度比例,以及社会人口统计学因素。使用描述性统计和卡方检验来评估历年的利用率趋势。结果:结肠镜检查仍然是最常用的筛查方式,其占比从2017年的53.0%小幅上升至2023年的58.7%。mt-sDNA检测比例从2017年的2.4%大幅上升至2023年的20.4%,而FIT/FOBT检测比例则大幅下降,从44%下降至20.4%。同样,筛查利用率也发生了显著的年龄相关变化,从2017年到2023年,45-49岁年龄组的结肠镜检查比例从48.1%上升到61.6%,mt-sDNA从0.0%上升到24.0%,FIT/FOBT从50.8%下降到14.1%。结论:从2017年到2023年,结直肠癌筛查的使用率发生了显著变化,结肠镜检查的使用率稳步上升,mt-sDNA检测的使用率显著上升,FIT/FOBT的使用率急剧下降。对这些趋势的持续监测对于了解CRC筛查的演变情况和确保所有人群获得最有效的方式至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Current Medical Research and Opinion 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信