The effect of remdesivir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir on mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 during the Omicron era - an emulated target trial.

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
John Karlsson Valik, Pontus Hedberg, Piotr Nowak, Ola Blennow, Robert Dyrdak, Jan Vesterbacka, Johan Zetterqvist, Pontus Naucler
{"title":"The effect of remdesivir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir on mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 during the Omicron era - an emulated target trial.","authors":"John Karlsson Valik, Pontus Hedberg, Piotr Nowak, Ola Blennow, Robert Dyrdak, Jan Vesterbacka, Johan Zetterqvist, Pontus Naucler","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.09.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Despite widespread population immunity, SARS-CoV-2 infection remains a common cause of hospitalization. While antiviral treatments have shown efficacy in clinical trials, often in outpatient settings, emerging real-world evidence in hospitalized patients is conflicting. Additionally, the impact of immunity status or viral load remains insufficiently studied. Our aim was to assesses the effect of remdesivir and/or nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in acute SARS-CoV-2 infection requiring hospital admission, including clinically relevant subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective population-based cohort study designed as an emulated target trial. Patients were included from six acute care hospitals in Stockholm, Sweden during the Omicron era. All adult patients admitted via the emergency department with a diagnosis indicating infection and a positive polymerase chain reaction SARS-CoV-2 test were assessed for eligibility. Viral burden was estimated using cycle threshold (Ct)-values. Data was analysed using cloning, censoring, and inverse probability weighting. The primary and secondary outcome was 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality, respectively. Safety outcomes included new-onset kidney failure, liver failure, and cardiac arrhythmia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 4,016 included patients, 771 (19%) received antiviral treatment. Overall mortality was 9.1% (n=365) at 30 days and 13.8% (n=554) at 90 days. The adjusted risk ratio (aRR) of antiviral treatment was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.62-1.01) for 30-day mortality and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.63-0.97) for 90-day mortality. The treatment effect was greater in unvaccinated individuals without previous confirmed infection (aRR 0.38 [95% CI, 0.18-0.67] versus aRR 0.95 (0.64 to 1.39) in recently vaccinated). No clear differences were observed in subgroups based on age or Ct-value, but precision was limited. Safety analyses revealed no substantial risk with antiviral treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment with remdesivir and/or nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was associated with reduced mortality in hospitalized SARS-CoV-2 infected patients during the Omicron era, primarily in unvaccinated individuals without previous infection. Our findings support prioritizing non-immune individuals for antiviral treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.09.012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Despite widespread population immunity, SARS-CoV-2 infection remains a common cause of hospitalization. While antiviral treatments have shown efficacy in clinical trials, often in outpatient settings, emerging real-world evidence in hospitalized patients is conflicting. Additionally, the impact of immunity status or viral load remains insufficiently studied. Our aim was to assesses the effect of remdesivir and/or nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in acute SARS-CoV-2 infection requiring hospital admission, including clinically relevant subgroups.

Methods: We performed a retrospective population-based cohort study designed as an emulated target trial. Patients were included from six acute care hospitals in Stockholm, Sweden during the Omicron era. All adult patients admitted via the emergency department with a diagnosis indicating infection and a positive polymerase chain reaction SARS-CoV-2 test were assessed for eligibility. Viral burden was estimated using cycle threshold (Ct)-values. Data was analysed using cloning, censoring, and inverse probability weighting. The primary and secondary outcome was 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality, respectively. Safety outcomes included new-onset kidney failure, liver failure, and cardiac arrhythmia.

Results: Among 4,016 included patients, 771 (19%) received antiviral treatment. Overall mortality was 9.1% (n=365) at 30 days and 13.8% (n=554) at 90 days. The adjusted risk ratio (aRR) of antiviral treatment was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.62-1.01) for 30-day mortality and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.63-0.97) for 90-day mortality. The treatment effect was greater in unvaccinated individuals without previous confirmed infection (aRR 0.38 [95% CI, 0.18-0.67] versus aRR 0.95 (0.64 to 1.39) in recently vaccinated). No clear differences were observed in subgroups based on age or Ct-value, but precision was limited. Safety analyses revealed no substantial risk with antiviral treatment.

Conclusions: Treatment with remdesivir and/or nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was associated with reduced mortality in hospitalized SARS-CoV-2 infected patients during the Omicron era, primarily in unvaccinated individuals without previous infection. Our findings support prioritizing non-immune individuals for antiviral treatment.

remdesivir和nirmatrelvir/ritonavir对Omicron时代COVID-19住院患者死亡率的影响——一项模拟靶标试验
目的:尽管人群普遍免疫,但SARS-CoV-2感染仍然是住院治疗的常见原因。虽然抗病毒治疗在临床试验中(通常是在门诊环境中)显示出疗效,但在住院患者中出现的真实证据却相互矛盾。此外,免疫状态或病毒载量的影响仍未得到充分研究。我们的目的是评估瑞德西韦和/或尼马特利韦/利托那韦对需要住院治疗的急性SARS-CoV-2感染的疗效,包括临床相关亚组。方法:我们进行了一项以人群为基础的回顾性队列研究,设计为模拟目标试验。在欧米克隆时代,患者来自瑞典斯德哥尔摩的六家急症护理医院。所有通过急诊科入院的诊断为感染且聚合酶链反应SARS-CoV-2检测阳性的成年患者均被评估为合格。使用周期阈值(Ct)值估计病毒负荷。数据分析采用克隆、审查和逆概率加权。主要和次要终点分别是30天和90天的全因死亡率。安全性结局包括新发肾衰竭、肝功能衰竭和心律失常。结果:4016例患者中,771例(19%)接受抗病毒治疗。30天总死亡率为9.1% (n=365), 90天总死亡率为13.8% (n=554)。抗病毒治疗30天死亡率校正风险比(aRR)为0.80 (95% CI, 0.62-1.01), 90天死亡率校正风险比为0.78 (95% CI, 0.63-0.97)。治疗效果在以前没有确诊感染的未接种疫苗的个体中更大(aRR 0.38 [95% CI, 0.18-0.67],而最近接种疫苗的aRR 0.95(0.64 - 1.39))。基于年龄或ct值的亚组间未观察到明显差异,但精确度有限。安全性分析显示抗病毒治疗无重大风险。结论:使用瑞德西韦和/或尼马特利韦/利托那韦治疗与住院SARS-CoV-2感染患者的死亡率降低相关,主要是在未接种疫苗且既往感染的个体中。我们的研究结果支持优先对非免疫个体进行抗病毒治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信