A Time-Cost Analysis of Operating Room Utilization and Efficiency in Cardiac Surgery.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
British journal of hospital medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-25 Epub Date: 2025-09-05 DOI:10.12968/hmed.2024.0836
Suvitesh Luthra, Gabriel Hunduma, Ahmed Eissa, Laura Viola, Szabolcs Miskolczi, Theodore Velissaris
{"title":"A Time-Cost Analysis of Operating Room Utilization and Efficiency in Cardiac Surgery.","authors":"Suvitesh Luthra, Gabriel Hunduma, Ahmed Eissa, Laura Viola, Szabolcs Miskolczi, Theodore Velissaris","doi":"10.12968/hmed.2024.0836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aims/Background</b> The aim of this analysis was to determine Operating Room (OR) utilization efficiencies and costs in cardiac surgery. <b>Methods</b> A retrospective cohort of 1987 cardiac surgeries were analyzed over a 2-year period for surgeon idling time, knife-to-skin time, procedure time, total operation time and transfer times in a two-case/block model. Predefined indices of operational efficiency (Index of Operational Efficiency [InOE], Surgical Index of Operational Efficiency [sInOE]) were calculated for various procedures and teams. The goodness of fit of regression curves were performed for InOE for various times on the operational pathway. <b>Results</b> The mean 'procedure time' was 246 ± 73 minutes (78% of total OR time). OR utilization efficiencies were highest for aortic valve replacement (AVR) and coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and least for complex aortic procedures. Significant differences existed for procedure-specific and team-specific OR times and operational efficiency. Procedure times correlated strongest with InOE (r = -0.940, <i>p</i> < 0.001). They had a closer linear fit to regression curve analysis thus indicating greater efficiency. <b>Conclusion</b> There were significant variations between OR times and efficiencies for procedures and teams. Significant cost savings are possible by increasing efficiency along the operational pathways in cardiac surgery theatres.</p>","PeriodicalId":9256,"journal":{"name":"British journal of hospital medicine","volume":"86 9","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2024.0836","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/Background The aim of this analysis was to determine Operating Room (OR) utilization efficiencies and costs in cardiac surgery. Methods A retrospective cohort of 1987 cardiac surgeries were analyzed over a 2-year period for surgeon idling time, knife-to-skin time, procedure time, total operation time and transfer times in a two-case/block model. Predefined indices of operational efficiency (Index of Operational Efficiency [InOE], Surgical Index of Operational Efficiency [sInOE]) were calculated for various procedures and teams. The goodness of fit of regression curves were performed for InOE for various times on the operational pathway. Results The mean 'procedure time' was 246 ± 73 minutes (78% of total OR time). OR utilization efficiencies were highest for aortic valve replacement (AVR) and coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and least for complex aortic procedures. Significant differences existed for procedure-specific and team-specific OR times and operational efficiency. Procedure times correlated strongest with InOE (r = -0.940, p < 0.001). They had a closer linear fit to regression curve analysis thus indicating greater efficiency. Conclusion There were significant variations between OR times and efficiencies for procedures and teams. Significant cost savings are possible by increasing efficiency along the operational pathways in cardiac surgery theatres.

心脏外科手术室利用与效率的时间成本分析。
目的/背景本分析的目的是确定心脏手术手术室(OR)的使用效率和成本。方法回顾性分析1987例心脏手术患者2年的手术空转时间、刀到皮肤时间、手术时间、总手术时间和转移次数,采用2例/块模型。计算了各手术、各团队的手术效率指标(手术效率指数[InOE]、手术效率指数[sInOE])。在操作路径上对不同时间的InOE进行回归曲线的拟合优度检验。结果平均手术时间为246±73分钟,占手术总时间的78%。主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)和冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)的手术室利用率最高,复杂主动脉手术的手术室利用率最低。特定程序和特定团队的手术室时间和操作效率存在显著差异。手术次数与InOE相关性最强(r = -0.940, p < 0.001)。他们有一个更接近线性拟合回归曲线分析,从而表明更高的效率。结论手术时间和效率在手术流程和团队之间存在显著差异。通过提高心脏手术室操作路径的效率,可以显著节省成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British journal of hospital medicine
British journal of hospital medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: British Journal of Hospital Medicine was established in 1966, and is still true to its origins: a monthly, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary review journal for hospital doctors and doctors in training. The journal publishes an authoritative mix of clinical reviews, education and training updates, quality improvement projects and case reports, and book reviews from recognized leaders in the profession. The Core Training for Doctors section provides clinical information in an easily accessible format for doctors in training. British Journal of Hospital Medicine is an invaluable resource for hospital doctors at all stages of their career. The journal is indexed on Medline, CINAHL, the Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信