Effects of General Anesthesia Induced by Remimazolam and Propofol on Adverse and Inflammatory Reactions in Patients After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
British journal of hospital medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-25 Epub Date: 2025-09-15 DOI:10.12968/hmed.2025.0255
Fang Wang, Hua Zhuo, Hui Zhang
{"title":"Effects of General Anesthesia Induced by Remimazolam and Propofol on Adverse and Inflammatory Reactions in Patients After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Fang Wang, Hua Zhuo, Hui Zhang","doi":"10.12968/hmed.2025.0255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aims/Background</b> Globally, colorectal cancer ranks as the third most common malignant tumor. This study aims to evaluate and compare the effects of remimazolam versus propofol in patients undergoing surgical treatment for colorectal cancer. <b>Methods</b> This study retrospectively analyzed 160 patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery from January 2023 to December 2024 at the First People's Hospital of Xiaoshan District. Seventy-five patients receiving propofol anesthesia were classified in the control group, whereas 85 patients anesthesized with remimazolam were categorized in the study group. Anesthesia index levels, recovery quality (Riker sedation-agitation scale [SAS] and confusion assessment method-Chinese revision [CAM-CR]), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), adverse effects and levels of inflammatory factors, such as interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), were analyzed using chi-squared test and <i>t</i>-tests. <b>Results</b> In the study group, the time to anesthesia onset, recovery duration, length of stay in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), as well as the SAS and CAM-CR scores, were significantly shorter compared to those in the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). At 3 min before anesthesia (T1), there were no differences in MAP and heart rate levels between the two groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). At 30 min after anesthesia (T2), immediately after surgery (T3), and 5 min after surgery (T4), the MAP of the study group exceeded those observed in the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was 10.59% (9/85), which was significantly lower than that in the control group (37.33% (28/75)) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Furthermore, during the same postoperative period, levels of IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α were found to be reduced in the study group compared to the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). <b>Conclusion</b> Remimazolam outperforms propofol in inducing general anesthesia for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery, evidenced by improvement in recovery quality and hemodynamic level, as well as reduction in the incidence of adverse effects and inflammatory level.</p>","PeriodicalId":9256,"journal":{"name":"British journal of hospital medicine","volume":"86 9","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2025.0255","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/Background Globally, colorectal cancer ranks as the third most common malignant tumor. This study aims to evaluate and compare the effects of remimazolam versus propofol in patients undergoing surgical treatment for colorectal cancer. Methods This study retrospectively analyzed 160 patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery from January 2023 to December 2024 at the First People's Hospital of Xiaoshan District. Seventy-five patients receiving propofol anesthesia were classified in the control group, whereas 85 patients anesthesized with remimazolam were categorized in the study group. Anesthesia index levels, recovery quality (Riker sedation-agitation scale [SAS] and confusion assessment method-Chinese revision [CAM-CR]), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), adverse effects and levels of inflammatory factors, such as interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), were analyzed using chi-squared test and t-tests. Results In the study group, the time to anesthesia onset, recovery duration, length of stay in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), as well as the SAS and CAM-CR scores, were significantly shorter compared to those in the control group (p < 0.05). At 3 min before anesthesia (T1), there were no differences in MAP and heart rate levels between the two groups (p > 0.05). At 30 min after anesthesia (T2), immediately after surgery (T3), and 5 min after surgery (T4), the MAP of the study group exceeded those observed in the control group (p < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was 10.59% (9/85), which was significantly lower than that in the control group (37.33% (28/75)) (p < 0.05). Furthermore, during the same postoperative period, levels of IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α were found to be reduced in the study group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Conclusion Remimazolam outperforms propofol in inducing general anesthesia for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery, evidenced by improvement in recovery quality and hemodynamic level, as well as reduction in the incidence of adverse effects and inflammatory level.

雷马唑仑和异丙酚诱导全身麻醉对结直肠癌术后患者不良反应和炎症反应的影响:回顾性研究。
在全球范围内,结直肠癌是第三大最常见的恶性肿瘤。本研究旨在评价和比较雷马唑仑与异丙酚在大肠癌手术治疗中的作用。方法回顾性分析2023年1月至2024年12月在萧山区第一人民医院行结直肠癌手术的160例患者。75例丙泊酚麻醉患者为对照组,85例雷马唑仑麻醉患者为研究组。采用卡方检验和t检验分析麻醉指数水平、恢复质量(Riker镇静-躁动量表[SAS]和混淆评定法-中国修订[CAM-CR])、平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、不良反应及炎症因子如白细胞介素(IL)-6、IL-8、肿瘤坏死因子α (TNF-α)水平。结果研究组麻醉起麻时间、恢复时间、麻醉后监护病房(PACU)住院时间及SAS、CAM-CR评分均显著短于对照组(p < 0.05)。麻醉前3 min (T1),两组间MAP和心率水平比较,差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。研究组在麻醉后30min (T2)、术后即刻(T3)、术后5min (T4) MAP均高于对照组(p < 0.05)。研究组不良反应发生率为10.59%(9/85),显著低于对照组37.33% (28/75)(p < 0.05)。此外,在术后同一时间段,研究组的IL-6、IL-8、TNF-α水平均低于对照组(p < 0.05)。结论雷马唑仑对大肠癌手术患者的全身麻醉效果优于异丙酚,可提高患者的恢复质量和血流动力学水平,降低不良反应发生率和炎症水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British journal of hospital medicine
British journal of hospital medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: British Journal of Hospital Medicine was established in 1966, and is still true to its origins: a monthly, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary review journal for hospital doctors and doctors in training. The journal publishes an authoritative mix of clinical reviews, education and training updates, quality improvement projects and case reports, and book reviews from recognized leaders in the profession. The Core Training for Doctors section provides clinical information in an easily accessible format for doctors in training. British Journal of Hospital Medicine is an invaluable resource for hospital doctors at all stages of their career. The journal is indexed on Medline, CINAHL, the Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信