Exploring the synthesis of mouse cursor tracking and drift diffusion modeling in a perceptual decision-making task.

IF 3.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Oliver Grenke, Stefan Scherbaum, Martin Schoemann
{"title":"Exploring the synthesis of mouse cursor tracking and drift diffusion modeling in a perceptual decision-making task.","authors":"Oliver Grenke, Stefan Scherbaum, Martin Schoemann","doi":"10.3758/s13428-025-02805-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Process tracing and process modeling are the two primary behavioral approaches for uncovering human decision-making processes. However, both approaches face significant limitations: process tracing offers a large and oftentimes confusing number of measures, while process modeling relies on a minimal number of comparable trials for reliable model fitting. In our study, we explore how we can combine mouse cursor tracking and the drift diffusion model (DDM) in order to both reduce the number of cursor measures and circumvent the minimal trial amount requirements of DDM fitting. One hundred three participants completed 90 trials in a random dot kinematogram (RDK). A total of 18 cursor measures were taken from the mouse cursor tracking literature and used to predict drift rate, threshold separation, and non-decision time of the DDM via partial least squares regression. Four cursor measures contributed significantly to the prediction of the DDM parameters. When reducing the available trials, these cursor measures, in combination with response time and accuracy, performed better and remained more stable in the prediction of DDM parameters than model fitting. Our results lower the barrier for applying mouse cursor tracking for novice researchers by highlighting important cursor measures and their mapping to psychological constructs of decision-making, while also offering an approach for behavioral scientists to investigate DDM components in experimental setups with a restricted number of trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":8717,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Research Methods","volume":"57 11","pages":"297"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460430/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-025-02805-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Process tracing and process modeling are the two primary behavioral approaches for uncovering human decision-making processes. However, both approaches face significant limitations: process tracing offers a large and oftentimes confusing number of measures, while process modeling relies on a minimal number of comparable trials for reliable model fitting. In our study, we explore how we can combine mouse cursor tracking and the drift diffusion model (DDM) in order to both reduce the number of cursor measures and circumvent the minimal trial amount requirements of DDM fitting. One hundred three participants completed 90 trials in a random dot kinematogram (RDK). A total of 18 cursor measures were taken from the mouse cursor tracking literature and used to predict drift rate, threshold separation, and non-decision time of the DDM via partial least squares regression. Four cursor measures contributed significantly to the prediction of the DDM parameters. When reducing the available trials, these cursor measures, in combination with response time and accuracy, performed better and remained more stable in the prediction of DDM parameters than model fitting. Our results lower the barrier for applying mouse cursor tracking for novice researchers by highlighting important cursor measures and their mapping to psychological constructs of decision-making, while also offering an approach for behavioral scientists to investigate DDM components in experimental setups with a restricted number of trials.

探索在感知决策任务中鼠标光标跟踪和漂移扩散建模的综合。
过程跟踪和过程建模是揭示人类决策过程的两种主要行为方法。然而,这两种方法都面临着显著的局限性:过程跟踪提供了大量且经常令人困惑的度量,而过程建模依赖于可靠模型拟合的最小数量的可比试验。在我们的研究中,我们探索了如何将鼠标光标跟踪与漂移扩散模型(DDM)结合起来,以减少光标测量的数量,并规避DDM拟合的最小试验量要求。103名参与者在随机点运动学图(RDK)中完成了90次试验。从鼠标光标跟踪文献中选取18个光标测量值,通过偏最小二乘回归预测DDM的漂移率、阈值分离和非决策时间。四种游标测量对DDM参数的预测有显著贡献。当减少可用试验时,这些游标测量与响应时间和准确性相结合,在预测DDM参数方面表现更好,并且比模型拟合更稳定。我们的研究结果通过强调重要的光标测量及其对决策心理结构的映射,降低了新手研究人员应用鼠标光标跟踪的障碍,同时也为行为科学家在实验设置中研究DDM成分提供了一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.30%
发文量
266
期刊介绍: Behavior Research Methods publishes articles concerned with the methods, techniques, and instrumentation of research in experimental psychology. The journal focuses particularly on the use of computer technology in psychological research. An annual special issue is devoted to this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信