Reliable Structures and Electronic Energies of Small Water Clusters Using Density Functional and Local Correlation Coupled Cluster Model Chemistries

IF 2.8 2区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Benjamin T. Petty, , , Vance R. Fowler, , , Audrey Ryu, , , Caroline S. Glick, , , Carly A. Rock, , , Qihang Wang, , , Gregory S. Tschumper*, , and , George C. Shields*, 
{"title":"Reliable Structures and Electronic Energies of Small Water Clusters Using Density Functional and Local Correlation Coupled Cluster Model Chemistries","authors":"Benjamin T. Petty,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Vance R. Fowler,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Audrey Ryu,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Caroline S. Glick,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Carly A. Rock,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Qihang Wang,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Gregory S. Tschumper*,&nbsp;, and ,&nbsp;George C. Shields*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jpca.5c04923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >In this paper we have assessed the ability of the domain-based local pair natural orbital (DLPNO)-CCSD(T) method to match the explicitly correlated CCSD(T) relative energies of (H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub><i>n</i>=3–7</sub> isomers along with the impact of the level of theory utilized to optimize the water cluster geometries. The benchmark structures were optimized using a 2-body:Many-body procedure in which all of the 1- and 2-body contributions are computed using CCSD(T) while all of the higher-order many-body interactions are computed using MP2 (denoted CCSD(T):MP2). Benchmark relative energies were computed for these CCSD(T):MP2 optimized geometries with explicitly correlated CCSD(T)-F12b single point energies (SPEs) using the cc-pVQZ-F12 and cc-pV5Z-F12 basis sets augmented with diffuse functions on the O atoms. The benchmark structures and energies were used to gauge the performance of less demanding computational protocols. For example, DLPNO–CCSD(T) computations on the 31 benchmark structures with the analogous family of correlation consistent basis sets (cc-pVNZ for H and aug-cc-pVNZ for O, or simply haNZ where N = D-6) were used to estimate relative energies at the complete basis set (CBS) limit via three-point extrapolations. When compared to the CCSD(T)-F12 benchmark data, the mean absolute differences (MADs) were ≤ 0.13 kcal/mol when triple-ζ and larger basis sets were employed. Using these DLPNO–CCSD(T) results, we demonstrate that 2 less-demanding geometry optimization procedures, specifically the ωB97X-D density functional theory (DFT) method paired with the 6–31++G(d,p) basis set and the density-fitted MP2 method paired with the haTZ basis set, give structures that yield nearly identical relative energies (MADs of only 0.07 and 0.02 kcal/mol, respectively, when comparing DLPNO–CCSD(T)/ha6Z data). In addition, we show how the presence or absence of diffuse functions in the basis sets used for DLPNO–CCSD(T) SPEs impact the quality of the relative energies. The protocol that combines ωB97X-D/6–31++G(d,p) optimized structures with DLPNO–CCSD(T) SPEs using triple-ζ or higher Dunning basis sets that include augmentation with diffuse functions on the oxygen atoms provides a fast and accurate method for determining the relative electronic energies of (H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub><i>n</i>=3–7</sub> water cluster isomers.</p>","PeriodicalId":59,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry A","volume":"129 40","pages":"9291–9302"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.jpca.5c04923","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry A","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpca.5c04923","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper we have assessed the ability of the domain-based local pair natural orbital (DLPNO)-CCSD(T) method to match the explicitly correlated CCSD(T) relative energies of (H2O)n=3–7 isomers along with the impact of the level of theory utilized to optimize the water cluster geometries. The benchmark structures were optimized using a 2-body:Many-body procedure in which all of the 1- and 2-body contributions are computed using CCSD(T) while all of the higher-order many-body interactions are computed using MP2 (denoted CCSD(T):MP2). Benchmark relative energies were computed for these CCSD(T):MP2 optimized geometries with explicitly correlated CCSD(T)-F12b single point energies (SPEs) using the cc-pVQZ-F12 and cc-pV5Z-F12 basis sets augmented with diffuse functions on the O atoms. The benchmark structures and energies were used to gauge the performance of less demanding computational protocols. For example, DLPNO–CCSD(T) computations on the 31 benchmark structures with the analogous family of correlation consistent basis sets (cc-pVNZ for H and aug-cc-pVNZ for O, or simply haNZ where N = D-6) were used to estimate relative energies at the complete basis set (CBS) limit via three-point extrapolations. When compared to the CCSD(T)-F12 benchmark data, the mean absolute differences (MADs) were ≤ 0.13 kcal/mol when triple-ζ and larger basis sets were employed. Using these DLPNO–CCSD(T) results, we demonstrate that 2 less-demanding geometry optimization procedures, specifically the ωB97X-D density functional theory (DFT) method paired with the 6–31++G(d,p) basis set and the density-fitted MP2 method paired with the haTZ basis set, give structures that yield nearly identical relative energies (MADs of only 0.07 and 0.02 kcal/mol, respectively, when comparing DLPNO–CCSD(T)/ha6Z data). In addition, we show how the presence or absence of diffuse functions in the basis sets used for DLPNO–CCSD(T) SPEs impact the quality of the relative energies. The protocol that combines ωB97X-D/6–31++G(d,p) optimized structures with DLPNO–CCSD(T) SPEs using triple-ζ or higher Dunning basis sets that include augmentation with diffuse functions on the oxygen atoms provides a fast and accurate method for determining the relative electronic energies of (H2O)n=3–7 water cluster isomers.

利用密度泛函和局部相关耦合簇模型化学研究水簇的可靠结构和电子能。
在本文中,我们评估了基于域的局部对自然轨道(DLPNO)-CCSD(T)方法匹配(H2O)n=3-7异构体显式相关CCSD(T)相对能量的能力,以及用于优化水簇几何形状的理论水平的影响。基准结构使用2体:多体过程进行优化,其中所有1体和2体贡献都使用CCSD(T)计算,而所有高阶多体相互作用都使用MP2计算(表示CCSD(T):MP2)。利用0原子上弥散函数增强的cc-pVQZ-F12和cc-pV5Z-F12基集,计算了具有显式相关CCSD(T):MP2优化几何图形的基准相对能量。基准结构和能量用于衡量要求较低的计算协议的性能。例如,使用DLPNO-CCSD(T)计算31个具有类似相关一致基集家族的基准结构(H为cc-pVNZ, O为aug-cc-pVNZ,或N = D-6的haNZ),通过三点外推来估计完全基集(CBS)极限处的相对能量。与CCSD(T)-F12基准数据相比,当采用三重ζ和更大的基集时,平均绝对差(MADs)≤0.13 kcal/mol。利用这些DLPNO-CCSD(T)结果,我们证明了2种要求较低的几何优化方法,特别是ωB97X-D密度函数理论(DFT)方法与6-31++G(d,p)基集配对,以及密度拟合MP2方法与haTZ基集配对,给出的结构产生几乎相同的相对能量(当比较DLPNO-CCSD(T)/ha6Z数据时,MADs分别仅为0.07和0.02 kcal/mol)。此外,我们还展示了用于DLPNO-CCSD(T) spe的基集中是否存在扩散函数如何影响相对能量的质量。该方案结合ωB97X-D/6-31++G(d,p)优化结构与DLPNO-CCSD(T) SPEs使用三重-ζ或更高的Dunning基集,包括增加与扩散函数在氧原子上提供了一个快速和准确的方法来确定(H2O)n=3-7水簇异构体的相对电子能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 化学-物理:原子、分子和化学物理
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
922
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physical Chemistry A is devoted to reporting new and original experimental and theoretical basic research of interest to physical chemists, biophysical chemists, and chemical physicists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信