Quantifying High-Frequency Turbulence Energy in the Atmosphere and Its Impact on Near-Surface Diffusion: Parameterization Scheme and Validation in WRF-Chem

IF 3.4 2区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Liu Zhenxin, Zhang Wenxi, Liu Lei, Li Xiaolan, Mao Yuhao, Liao Hong
{"title":"Quantifying High-Frequency Turbulence Energy in the Atmosphere and Its Impact on Near-Surface Diffusion: Parameterization Scheme and Validation in WRF-Chem","authors":"Liu Zhenxin,&nbsp;Zhang Wenxi,&nbsp;Liu Lei,&nbsp;Li Xiaolan,&nbsp;Mao Yuhao,&nbsp;Liao Hong","doi":"10.1029/2025JD043961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Atmospheric turbulence is a key meteorological factor influencing the diffusion of urban near-surface air pollution. The turbulence energy spectrum characterizes the distribution of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) across different eddy scales, with the total energy affecting the diffusion coefficient and pollutant dispersion. Current methods for calculating TKE are sensitive to the temporal resolution of wind speed data, and the limited sampling frequency of instruments is much lower than the dissipation scale. Thus, the high-frequency turbulence energy is missed, and the total TKE is underestimated. To address this issue, this study used high (∼10 Hz) and low (∼0.05 Hz) frequency wind observations from the Beijing 325-m meteorological tower to assess how sampling frequencies impact TKE calculations. The −5/3 law of the turbulence spectrum was applied to estimate the relationship between observed and theoretical total TKE, and a parameterization scheme was completed. Results showed that the underestimation due to sampling frequency limitations ranges from 10% to 37%, with higher proportions during night and winter. Then a correction factor (HTMC) was incorporated into the BouLac PBL scheme in WRF-Chem. Sensitivity simulations of a heavy haze event in Shenyang were set. The experimental group (EXP) showed lower concentrations of PM<sub>2.5</sub> near the surface and higher in higher altitudes than those in control group (CTR) during night, indicating stronger vertical turbulent transport. The concentrations in EXP better match observations, with simulation bias reduced from 23.77% to 6.18%. This work provides new insights into urban turbulence transport mechanisms and benefits to improvements in air quality forecasting.</p>","PeriodicalId":15986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","volume":"130 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JD043961","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Atmospheric turbulence is a key meteorological factor influencing the diffusion of urban near-surface air pollution. The turbulence energy spectrum characterizes the distribution of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) across different eddy scales, with the total energy affecting the diffusion coefficient and pollutant dispersion. Current methods for calculating TKE are sensitive to the temporal resolution of wind speed data, and the limited sampling frequency of instruments is much lower than the dissipation scale. Thus, the high-frequency turbulence energy is missed, and the total TKE is underestimated. To address this issue, this study used high (∼10 Hz) and low (∼0.05 Hz) frequency wind observations from the Beijing 325-m meteorological tower to assess how sampling frequencies impact TKE calculations. The −5/3 law of the turbulence spectrum was applied to estimate the relationship between observed and theoretical total TKE, and a parameterization scheme was completed. Results showed that the underestimation due to sampling frequency limitations ranges from 10% to 37%, with higher proportions during night and winter. Then a correction factor (HTMC) was incorporated into the BouLac PBL scheme in WRF-Chem. Sensitivity simulations of a heavy haze event in Shenyang were set. The experimental group (EXP) showed lower concentrations of PM2.5 near the surface and higher in higher altitudes than those in control group (CTR) during night, indicating stronger vertical turbulent transport. The concentrations in EXP better match observations, with simulation bias reduced from 23.77% to 6.18%. This work provides new insights into urban turbulence transport mechanisms and benefits to improvements in air quality forecasting.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

大气高频湍流能量的量化及其对近地表扩散的影响:WRF-Chem的参数化方案和验证
大气湍流是影响城市近地表大气污染扩散的关键气象因子。湍流能谱表征了湍流动能(TKE)在不同涡旋尺度上的分布,总能量影响扩散系数和污染物扩散。目前计算TKE的方法对风速资料的时间分辨率比较敏感,仪器的有限采样频率远低于耗散尺度。因此,忽略了高频湍流能量,低估了总TKE。为了解决这个问题,本研究使用来自北京325米气象塔的高(~ 10 Hz)和低(~ 0.05 Hz)频率风观测来评估采样频率如何影响TKE计算。利用湍流谱的−5/3定律估计了观测总TKE与理论总TKE的关系,并完成了参数化方案。结果表明,由于采样频率的限制,被低估的比例在10% ~ 37%之间,其中夜间和冬季的比例更高。然后在WRF-Chem的BouLac PBL方案中加入校正因子(HTMC)。建立了沈阳一次重雾霾事件的敏感性模拟。与对照组(CTR)相比,实验组(EXP)夜间近地表PM2.5浓度较低,高海拔PM2.5浓度较高,表明垂直湍流输送较强。EXP中的浓度与观测值吻合较好,模拟偏差从23.77%降低到6.18%。这项工作为城市湍流输送机制提供了新的见解,并有利于改善空气质量预报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
684
期刊介绍: JGR: Atmospheres publishes articles that advance and improve understanding of atmospheric properties and processes, including the interaction of the atmosphere with other components of the Earth system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信