A Framework for Variational Inference and Data Assimilation of Soil Biogeochemical Models Using Normalizing Flows

IF 4.6 2区 地球科学 Q1 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
H. W. Xie, D. Sujono, T. Ryder, E. B. Sudderth, S. D. Allison
{"title":"A Framework for Variational Inference and Data Assimilation of Soil Biogeochemical Models Using Normalizing Flows","authors":"H. W. Xie,&nbsp;D. Sujono,&nbsp;T. Ryder,&nbsp;E. B. Sudderth,&nbsp;S. D. Allison","doi":"10.1029/2024MS004547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil biogeochemical models (SBMs) represent soil variables and their responses to global change. Data assimilation approaches help determine whether SBMs accurately represent soil processes consistent with soil pool and flux measurements. Bayesian inference is commonly used in data assimilation procedures that estimate posterior parameter distributions with Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. The ability to account for data and parameter uncertainty is a strength of MCMC inference, but the computational inefficiency of MCMC methods remains a barrier to their wider application, especially with large data sets. Given the limitations of MCMC approaches, we developed an alternative variational inference framework that uses a method called <i>normalizing flows</i> from the field of machine learning. Normalizing flows rely on deep learning to map probability distributions and approximate SBMs that have been discretized into state space models. As a test of our method, we fit approximated SBMs to synthetic data sourced from known data-generating processes to identify discrepancies between the inference results and true parameter values. Our approach compares favorably with established MCMC methods and could be a viable alternative for SBM data assimilation that reduces computational time and resource needs. However, our method has some limitations, including challenges assimilating data with irregular measurement intervals, underestimation of posterior parameter uncertainty, and limited goodness-of-fit metrics for comparison to MCMC inference methods. Many of these limitations could be overcome with additional algorithm development based on the approaches we report here.</p>","PeriodicalId":14881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems","volume":"17 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024MS004547","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024MS004547","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil biogeochemical models (SBMs) represent soil variables and their responses to global change. Data assimilation approaches help determine whether SBMs accurately represent soil processes consistent with soil pool and flux measurements. Bayesian inference is commonly used in data assimilation procedures that estimate posterior parameter distributions with Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. The ability to account for data and parameter uncertainty is a strength of MCMC inference, but the computational inefficiency of MCMC methods remains a barrier to their wider application, especially with large data sets. Given the limitations of MCMC approaches, we developed an alternative variational inference framework that uses a method called normalizing flows from the field of machine learning. Normalizing flows rely on deep learning to map probability distributions and approximate SBMs that have been discretized into state space models. As a test of our method, we fit approximated SBMs to synthetic data sourced from known data-generating processes to identify discrepancies between the inference results and true parameter values. Our approach compares favorably with established MCMC methods and could be a viable alternative for SBM data assimilation that reduces computational time and resource needs. However, our method has some limitations, including challenges assimilating data with irregular measurement intervals, underestimation of posterior parameter uncertainty, and limited goodness-of-fit metrics for comparison to MCMC inference methods. Many of these limitations could be overcome with additional algorithm development based on the approaches we report here.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于归一化流的土壤生物地球化学模型变分推断和数据同化框架
土壤生物地球化学模型(sbm)代表土壤变量及其对全球变化的响应。数据同化方法有助于确定sbm是否准确地代表与土壤库和通量测量相一致的土壤过程。贝叶斯推理通常用于用马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗(MCMC)方法估计后验参数分布的数据同化过程。考虑数据和参数不确定性的能力是MCMC推理的优势,但MCMC方法的计算效率低下仍然是其更广泛应用的障碍,特别是在大型数据集上。鉴于MCMC方法的局限性,我们开发了一种替代变分推理框架,该框架使用了一种来自机器学习领域的称为归一化流的方法。归一化流依赖于深度学习来映射概率分布和近似已离散到状态空间模型中的sbm。作为我们方法的测试,我们将近似的sbm拟合到来自已知数据生成过程的合成数据中,以识别推理结果与真实参数值之间的差异。我们的方法与已建立的MCMC方法相比具有优势,可以作为SBM数据同化的可行替代方案,减少计算时间和资源需求。然而,我们的方法有一些局限性,包括同化不规则测量区间的数据,低估后验参数不确定性,以及与MCMC推理方法比较的拟合优度指标有限。许多这些限制可以通过基于我们在这里报告的方法的其他算法开发来克服。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES-
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
241
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems (JAMES) is committed to advancing the science of Earth systems modeling by offering high-quality scientific research through online availability and open access licensing. JAMES invites authors and readers from the international Earth systems modeling community. Open access. Articles are available free of charge for everyone with Internet access to view and download. Formal peer review. Supplemental material, such as code samples, images, and visualizations, is published at no additional charge. No additional charge for color figures. Modest page charges to cover production costs. Articles published in high-quality full text PDF, HTML, and XML. Internal and external reference linking, DOI registration, and forward linking via CrossRef.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信