Machine learning models for high-accuracy energy and exergy prediction of low-GWP R134a/R1234yf blends

IF 3.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Ragıp Yıldırım
{"title":"Machine learning models for high-accuracy energy and exergy prediction of low-GWP R134a/R1234yf blends","authors":"Ragıp Yıldırım","doi":"10.1007/s10973-025-14547-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A mathematical model of the vapor compression refrigeration cycle for different operating conditions (different evaporator and condenser temperatures, different superheat and supercooling temperatures) is established in the present study. Instead of R134a, mixtures of R134a and R1234yf with lower global warming potential values are evaluated as the working fluid in the vapor compression refrigeration cycle. The energy and exergy performances of these refrigerant mixtures were estimated by machine learning algorithms. Seven different machine learning algorithms have been used. These are support vector regression, random forest, extreme gradient boosting regressor (XGBR), CatBoost, light gradient boosting machine, adaptive boosting, and decision tree. The XGBR algorithm provided higher accuracy in the energy efficiency results of both refrigerants, with the best performance of the CatBoost algorithm in terms of exergy efficiency. For the blend of R134a/R1234yf (10/90), taking the evaporator temperatures as − 25 °C, − 20 °C, − 15 °C, − 10 °C, − 5 °C, and 0 °C, the condenser temperature as 35 °C and both superheating and subcooling temperatures as 7 °C, COP values vary between 2.6723 and 5.7909 and <span>\\({\\upeta }_{\\text{II}}\\)</span> vary between 0.6461 and 0.7420. At the same operating conditions, the COP values for the R134a/R1234yf (15/85) blend vary between 2.6731 and 5.7861, and the second law efficiencies <span>\\({\\upeta }_{\\text{II}}\\)</span> vary between 0.6463 and 0.7414. The R<sup>2</sup> values obtained as the result of the comparison of the actual and predicted values in the energy and exergy analyses for the R134a/R1234yf (10/90) mixture have been found as 0.9887 (energy efficiency) and 0.9810 (exergy efficiency), respectively. For the R134a/R1234yf (15/85) blend, R<sup>2</sup> values were 0.9881 (energy efficiency) and 0.9819 (exergy efficiency), respectively. This shows that machine learning algorithms can predict both energy and exergy analyses of R134a/R1234yf blend with high accuracy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry","volume":"150 18","pages":"14663 - 14672"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10973-025-14547-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A mathematical model of the vapor compression refrigeration cycle for different operating conditions (different evaporator and condenser temperatures, different superheat and supercooling temperatures) is established in the present study. Instead of R134a, mixtures of R134a and R1234yf with lower global warming potential values are evaluated as the working fluid in the vapor compression refrigeration cycle. The energy and exergy performances of these refrigerant mixtures were estimated by machine learning algorithms. Seven different machine learning algorithms have been used. These are support vector regression, random forest, extreme gradient boosting regressor (XGBR), CatBoost, light gradient boosting machine, adaptive boosting, and decision tree. The XGBR algorithm provided higher accuracy in the energy efficiency results of both refrigerants, with the best performance of the CatBoost algorithm in terms of exergy efficiency. For the blend of R134a/R1234yf (10/90), taking the evaporator temperatures as − 25 °C, − 20 °C, − 15 °C, − 10 °C, − 5 °C, and 0 °C, the condenser temperature as 35 °C and both superheating and subcooling temperatures as 7 °C, COP values vary between 2.6723 and 5.7909 and \({\upeta }_{\text{II}}\) vary between 0.6461 and 0.7420. At the same operating conditions, the COP values for the R134a/R1234yf (15/85) blend vary between 2.6731 and 5.7861, and the second law efficiencies \({\upeta }_{\text{II}}\) vary between 0.6463 and 0.7414. The R2 values obtained as the result of the comparison of the actual and predicted values in the energy and exergy analyses for the R134a/R1234yf (10/90) mixture have been found as 0.9887 (energy efficiency) and 0.9810 (exergy efficiency), respectively. For the R134a/R1234yf (15/85) blend, R2 values were 0.9881 (energy efficiency) and 0.9819 (exergy efficiency), respectively. This shows that machine learning algorithms can predict both energy and exergy analyses of R134a/R1234yf blend with high accuracy.

用于低gwp值R134a/R1234yf混合物高精度能量和火用预测的机器学习模型
本文建立了不同工况(不同蒸发器和冷凝器温度、不同过冷温度和过冷温度)下蒸汽压缩制冷循环的数学模型。采用全球变暖潜势值较低的R134a和R1234yf的混合物代替R134a作为蒸汽压缩制冷循环的工质。通过机器学习算法估计了这些制冷剂混合物的能量和火用性能。使用了七种不同的机器学习算法。它们是支持向量回归、随机森林、极端梯度增强回归器(XGBR)、CatBoost、轻梯度增强机、自适应增强和决策树。XGBR算法在两种制冷剂的能效结果中提供了更高的准确性,其中CatBoost算法在能效方面表现最好。对于R134a/R1234yf(10/90)共混物,在蒸发器温度为- 25℃、- 20℃、- 15℃、- 10℃、- 5℃和0℃,冷凝器温度为35℃,过冷过冷温度为7℃时,COP值在2.6723 ~ 5.7909之间,\({\upeta }_{\text{II}}\)值在0.6461 ~ 0.7420之间。在相同的操作条件下,R134a/R1234yf(15/85)混合物的COP值在2.6731和5.7861之间变化,第二定律效率\({\upeta }_{\text{II}}\)在0.6463和0.7414之间变化。R134a/R1234yf(10/90)混合物的能量和火用分析的实际值与预测值对比得到的R2值分别为0.9887(能量效率)和0.9810(火用效率)。对于R134a/R1234yf(15/85)共混物,R2值分别为0.9881(能量效率)和0.9819(火用效率)。这表明机器学习算法可以高精度地预测R134a/R1234yf混合料的能量和火用分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry is a fully peer reviewed journal publishing high quality papers covering all aspects of thermal analysis, calorimetry, and experimental thermodynamics. The journal publishes regular and special issues in twelve issues every year. The following types of papers are published: Original Research Papers, Short Communications, Reviews, Modern Instruments, Events and Book reviews. The subjects covered are: thermogravimetry, derivative thermogravimetry, differential thermal analysis, thermodilatometry, differential scanning calorimetry of all types, non-scanning calorimetry of all types, thermometry, evolved gas analysis, thermomechanical analysis, emanation thermal analysis, thermal conductivity, multiple techniques, and miscellaneous thermal methods (including the combination of the thermal method with various instrumental techniques), theory and instrumentation for thermal analysis and calorimetry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信