Conflicts or Facilitation? Post-Pandemic Reflection on the Work-Family Balance of Family Caregivers Under the COVID-19 Pandemic in China

IF 2.5 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Haijing Dai, Ka Hei Leung, Longxing Zhu
{"title":"Conflicts or Facilitation? Post-Pandemic Reflection on the Work-Family Balance of Family Caregivers Under the COVID-19 Pandemic in China","authors":"Haijing Dai,&nbsp;Ka Hei Leung,&nbsp;Longxing Zhu","doi":"10.1007/s11482-025-10479-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, which profoundly changed workplace norms and care support, on family caregivers’ sense of work-family balance. Existing theoretical frameworks, including the conflict view of work and family, the “Shecession” framework, the role facilitation approach, and the couple equity argument, often depict contradictory mechanisms of the impacts of the pandemic on the sense of work-family balance of family caregivers. This study navigates the different frameworks in the contexts of the zero-COVID policies in China. Based on data from a national online survey of 1,190 Chinese citizens over the age of 18, we find that while crisis family caregivers who had to participate in family care during quarantines tended to employ the conflict view of work and family, the facilitative view better explains the feelings of all-time primary family caregivers. Both types of caregivers, however, report positive impacts of quarantines on family relationships and work-family balance. The findings challenge the prevailing assumption of undermined work-family balance and suffering family caregivers during the pandemic, and advocate for workplace, social, and policy changes in the “normal” time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51483,"journal":{"name":"Applied Research in Quality of Life","volume":"20 4","pages":"1517 - 1534"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11482-025-10479-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Research in Quality of Life","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11482-025-10479-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, which profoundly changed workplace norms and care support, on family caregivers’ sense of work-family balance. Existing theoretical frameworks, including the conflict view of work and family, the “Shecession” framework, the role facilitation approach, and the couple equity argument, often depict contradictory mechanisms of the impacts of the pandemic on the sense of work-family balance of family caregivers. This study navigates the different frameworks in the contexts of the zero-COVID policies in China. Based on data from a national online survey of 1,190 Chinese citizens over the age of 18, we find that while crisis family caregivers who had to participate in family care during quarantines tended to employ the conflict view of work and family, the facilitative view better explains the feelings of all-time primary family caregivers. Both types of caregivers, however, report positive impacts of quarantines on family relationships and work-family balance. The findings challenge the prevailing assumption of undermined work-family balance and suffering family caregivers during the pandemic, and advocate for workplace, social, and policy changes in the “normal” time.

冲突还是促进?新冠肺炎疫情下中国家庭照顾者工作与家庭平衡的后疫情思考
新冠肺炎疫情深刻改变了工作场所规范和护理支持,本研究调查了疫情对家庭照顾者工作家庭平衡意识的影响。现有的理论框架,包括工作与家庭的冲突观、“衰退”框架、角色促进方法和夫妻公平论点,往往描述了大流行对家庭照顾者工作与家庭平衡感影响的矛盾机制。本研究在中国零covid政策背景下对不同框架进行了导航。根据对1190名18岁以上中国公民的全国在线调查数据,我们发现,在隔离期间不得不参与家庭护理的危机家庭照顾者倾向于采用工作和家庭的冲突观,而促进观更好地解释了所有主要家庭照顾者的感受。然而,这两种类型的护理人员都报告了隔离对家庭关系和工作与家庭平衡的积极影响。调查结果挑战了流行的假设,即工作与家庭的平衡被破坏,家庭照顾者在大流行期间遭受痛苦,并倡导在“正常”时间进行工作场所、社会和政策变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Research in Quality of Life
Applied Research in Quality of Life SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The aim of this journal is to publish conceptual, methodological and empirical papers dealing with quality-of-life studies in the applied areas of the natural and social sciences. As the official journal of the ISQOLS, it is designed to attract papers that have direct implications for, or impact on practical applications of research on the quality-of-life. We welcome papers crafted from interdisciplinary, inter-professional and international perspectives. This research should guide decision making in a variety of professions, industries, nonprofit, and government sectors, including healthcare, travel and tourism, marketing, corporate management, community planning, social work, public administration, and human resource management. The goal is to help decision makers apply performance measures and outcome assessment techniques based on concepts such as well-being, human satisfaction, human development, happiness, wellness and quality-of-life. The Editorial Review Board is divided into specific sections indicating the broad scope of practice covered by the journal. The section editors are distinguished scholars from many countries across the globe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信