Fidel Jesús Enciso Izquierdo , María José Amaya García , Paula Gómez Turégano , María Luengo Andrada , Ana Alejandra Cordero Vaquero , José Antonio Lucas Gamero , Sergio Garrido Domínguez , Irene Álvarez Reyes
{"title":"Active insulin time setting in MiniMed™ 780G: Impact on glucose control and patient perception","authors":"Fidel Jesús Enciso Izquierdo , María José Amaya García , Paula Gómez Turégano , María Luengo Andrada , Ana Alejandra Cordero Vaquero , José Antonio Lucas Gamero , Sergio Garrido Domínguez , Irene Álvarez Reyes","doi":"10.1016/j.endinu.2025.501635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The active insulin time (AIT) is an adjustable parameter of the MiniMed™ 780G (MM780G) system. We analyze glucose outcomes and patient perception at different AIT settings.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We conducted a quasi-experimental study on type 1 diabetes mellitus patients treated with MM780G, seen consecutively in our center. AIT was set at 2, 3 and 4<!--> <!-->h consecutively, during a 2-week period each. Glucose metrics, insulin delivery and a questionnaire about patient perception were evaluated. At the end, results were discussed with the patient and the most appropriate AIT was agreed upon.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 58 users were included, aged 18–65 years, 58.6% of whom were women. At baseline, 2-h AIT was set in 6.70% of the patients, >2-h AIT and ≤3-h AIT in 24.67%, >3-h AIT and ≤4-h AIT in 58.62%, and >4-h AIT in 10.34%. Under the 2-h AIT, TIR increased by 2.28% and 6.35% vs 3- and 4-h AIT, respectively. The auto-correction boluses percentage was 21.19% at 2-h AIT, 16.90% at 3-h AIT and 14.40% at 4-h AIT.</div><div>A total of 41.4% of the users considered that 3<!--> <!-->h was the AIT that most met their needs and 43.1% felt safer and less vulnerable to hypoglycemia at this setting. After trying on different AIT durations, 2<!--> <!-->h increased from 6.7% of participants to 62%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>At 2-h AIT, the system delivers more auto-correction insulin and improves TIR vs 3- and 4-h AIT. Patients feel safer and less susceptible to hypoglycemia at 3-h AIT, but 2 out of 3 would rather choose the 2-h AIT after knowing glycemic outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37725,"journal":{"name":"Endocrinologia, Diabetes y Nutricion","volume":"72 8","pages":"Article 501635"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrinologia, Diabetes y Nutricion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530016425001016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The active insulin time (AIT) is an adjustable parameter of the MiniMed™ 780G (MM780G) system. We analyze glucose outcomes and patient perception at different AIT settings.
Method
We conducted a quasi-experimental study on type 1 diabetes mellitus patients treated with MM780G, seen consecutively in our center. AIT was set at 2, 3 and 4 h consecutively, during a 2-week period each. Glucose metrics, insulin delivery and a questionnaire about patient perception were evaluated. At the end, results were discussed with the patient and the most appropriate AIT was agreed upon.
Results
A total of 58 users were included, aged 18–65 years, 58.6% of whom were women. At baseline, 2-h AIT was set in 6.70% of the patients, >2-h AIT and ≤3-h AIT in 24.67%, >3-h AIT and ≤4-h AIT in 58.62%, and >4-h AIT in 10.34%. Under the 2-h AIT, TIR increased by 2.28% and 6.35% vs 3- and 4-h AIT, respectively. The auto-correction boluses percentage was 21.19% at 2-h AIT, 16.90% at 3-h AIT and 14.40% at 4-h AIT.
A total of 41.4% of the users considered that 3 h was the AIT that most met their needs and 43.1% felt safer and less vulnerable to hypoglycemia at this setting. After trying on different AIT durations, 2 h increased from 6.7% of participants to 62%.
Conclusion
At 2-h AIT, the system delivers more auto-correction insulin and improves TIR vs 3- and 4-h AIT. Patients feel safer and less susceptible to hypoglycemia at 3-h AIT, but 2 out of 3 would rather choose the 2-h AIT after knowing glycemic outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Endocrinología, Diabetes y Nutrición is the official journal of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition (Sociedad Española de Endocrinología y Nutrición, SEEN) and the Spanish Society of Diabetes (Sociedad Española de Diabetes, SED), and was founded in 1954. The aim of the journal is to improve knowledge and be a useful tool in practice for clinical and laboratory specialists, trainee physicians, researchers, and nurses interested in endocrinology, diabetes, nutrition and related disciplines. It is an international journal published in Spanish (print and online) and English (online), covering different fields of endocrinology and metabolism, including diabetes, obesity, and nutrition disorders, as well as the most relevant research produced mainly in Spanish language territories. The quality of the contents is ensured by a prestigious national and international board, and by a selected panel of specialists involved in a rigorous peer review. The result is that only manuscripts containing high quality research and with utmost interest for clinicians and professionals related in the field are published. The Journal publishes Original clinical and research articles, Reviews, Special articles, Clinical Guidelines, Position Statements from both societies and Letters to the editor. Endocrinología, Diabetes y Nutrición can be found at Science Citation Index Expanded, Medline/PubMed and SCOPUS.