Environmental corporate social responsibility and port privatization in a mixed port supply chain competition

IF 3.4 3区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Lili Xu , Yuntong Yin , Sang-Ho Lee
{"title":"Environmental corporate social responsibility and port privatization in a mixed port supply chain competition","authors":"Lili Xu ,&nbsp;Yuntong Yin ,&nbsp;Sang-Ho Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.retrec.2025.101640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR) in a mixed port supply chain competition, wherein shipping lines, served by public or private ports, offer differentiated services. We explore the strategic interaction between the shipping lines' ECSR under freight rate competition and the government's port privatization policy. We find that adopting ECSR benefits shipping lines served by public ports but harms those served by private ports. This reduces port industry profitability while enhancing environmental and social performance. We also demonstrate that port privatization consistently decreases the ECSR levels of shipping lines served by privatized ports but increases them for those not served by such ports. The overall welfare effect crucially depends on the degree of substitutability between shipping services. Our findings suggest that when shipping services are highly substitutable, privatizing a public port can yield environmentally and socially desirable outcomes, though it may adversely affect the shipping industry and shippers under strategic ECSR conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47810,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Economics","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 101640"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885925001234","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR) in a mixed port supply chain competition, wherein shipping lines, served by public or private ports, offer differentiated services. We explore the strategic interaction between the shipping lines' ECSR under freight rate competition and the government's port privatization policy. We find that adopting ECSR benefits shipping lines served by public ports but harms those served by private ports. This reduces port industry profitability while enhancing environmental and social performance. We also demonstrate that port privatization consistently decreases the ECSR levels of shipping lines served by privatized ports but increases them for those not served by such ports. The overall welfare effect crucially depends on the degree of substitutability between shipping services. Our findings suggest that when shipping services are highly substitutable, privatizing a public port can yield environmentally and socially desirable outcomes, though it may adversely affect the shipping industry and shippers under strategic ECSR conditions.
混合港口供应链竞争中的环境企业社会责任与港口私有化
本研究考察了混合港口供应链竞争中的环境企业社会责任(ECSR),其中由公共或私人港口服务的航运公司提供差异化服务。本文探讨了运价竞争下航运公司的ECSR与政府港口私有化政策之间的战略互动关系。我们发现,采用ECSR有利于公共港口服务的航运公司,而不利于私人港口服务的航运公司。这降低了港口行业的盈利能力,同时提高了环境和社会绩效。我们还证明,港口私有化持续降低了私有化港口服务的航运公司的ECSR水平,但增加了那些没有被这些港口服务的航运公司的ECSR水平。总体福利效应关键取决于航运服务之间的可替代性程度。我们的研究结果表明,当航运服务具有高度可替代性时,将公共港口私有化可以产生环境和社会理想的结果,尽管它可能对战略ECSR条件下的航运业和托运人产生不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
59
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Economics is a journal devoted to the dissemination of high quality economics research in the field of transportation. The content covers a wide variety of topics relating to the economics aspects of transportation, government regulatory policies regarding transportation, and issues of concern to transportation industry planners. The unifying theme throughout the papers is the application of economic theory and/or applied economic methodologies to transportation questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信