Enhancing the economic viability and sustainability of biomass-to-methanol process: Simulation-based optimization framework for process design and operation

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Chanmok Kim , Chanhee You , Jiyong Kim
{"title":"Enhancing the economic viability and sustainability of biomass-to-methanol process: Simulation-based optimization framework for process design and operation","authors":"Chanmok Kim ,&nbsp;Chanhee You ,&nbsp;Jiyong Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study, a simulation-based optimization framework was developed that systematically addresses process design, operating conditions, and external factors for biomass-to-methanol (BTM) processes. By developing the technology superstructure representing all possible conversion pathways for the BTM process, detailed process simulations of major unit processes were performed to obtain mass and energy data and cost information. Based on these simulation results, a mixed-integer linear programming optimization model was formulated to identify optimal process designs and operating conditions under two distinct objectives: biomass-to-MeOH aimed at maximum profit (BTMP) and biomass-to-MeOH aimed at maximum CO<sub>2</sub> reduction (BTMC). The BTMP process achieved a unit production cost (UPC) of 0.47 $/kg, net CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent emissions (NCE) of 0.96 kgCO<sub>2eq</sub>/kg, carbon efficiency of 55 %, and energy efficiency of 49 %. The BTMC process resulted in superior environmental performance with NCE of 0.59 kgCO<sub>2eq</sub>/kg, carbon efficiency of 86 %, and energy efficiency of 59 %, but higher costs (UPC: 0.58 $/kg). Scenario-based analysis of key external factors—including biomass type, H<sub>2</sub> price, carbon intensity of supplementary H<sub>2</sub>, and carbon tax —revealed four distinct optimal solutions for BTMP and three for BTMC processes under varying market conditions. This framework provides quantitative guidance for implementing economically viable and environmentally sustainable BTM processes across diverse regional contexts and market conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"527 ","pages":"Article 146694"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095965262502044X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, a simulation-based optimization framework was developed that systematically addresses process design, operating conditions, and external factors for biomass-to-methanol (BTM) processes. By developing the technology superstructure representing all possible conversion pathways for the BTM process, detailed process simulations of major unit processes were performed to obtain mass and energy data and cost information. Based on these simulation results, a mixed-integer linear programming optimization model was formulated to identify optimal process designs and operating conditions under two distinct objectives: biomass-to-MeOH aimed at maximum profit (BTMP) and biomass-to-MeOH aimed at maximum CO2 reduction (BTMC). The BTMP process achieved a unit production cost (UPC) of 0.47 $/kg, net CO2 equivalent emissions (NCE) of 0.96 kgCO2eq/kg, carbon efficiency of 55 %, and energy efficiency of 49 %. The BTMC process resulted in superior environmental performance with NCE of 0.59 kgCO2eq/kg, carbon efficiency of 86 %, and energy efficiency of 59 %, but higher costs (UPC: 0.58 $/kg). Scenario-based analysis of key external factors—including biomass type, H2 price, carbon intensity of supplementary H2, and carbon tax —revealed four distinct optimal solutions for BTMP and three for BTMC processes under varying market conditions. This framework provides quantitative guidance for implementing economically viable and environmentally sustainable BTM processes across diverse regional contexts and market conditions.
提高生物质制甲醇工艺的经济可行性和可持续性:基于模拟的工艺设计和操作优化框架
在本研究中,开发了一个基于模拟的优化框架,系统地解决了生物质制甲醇(BTM)过程的工艺设计、操作条件和外部因素。通过开发代表BTM过程所有可能转换路径的技术上层结构,对主要单元过程进行了详细的过程模拟,以获得质量和能量数据以及成本信息。基于这些模拟结果,建立了一个混合整数线性规划优化模型,以确定两个不同目标下的最佳工艺设计和操作条件:以最大利润(BTMP)为目标的生物质制甲醇和以最大二氧化碳减排量(BTMC)为目标的生物质制甲醇。BTMP工艺的单位生产成本(UPC)为0.47美元/千克,净二氧化碳当量排放(NCE)为0.96千克二氧化碳当量/千克,碳效率为55%,能源效率为49%。BTMC工艺取得了良好的环境性能,新碳排放当量为0.59 kgco2当量/kg,碳效率为86%,能源效率为59%,但成本较高(UPC: 0.58美元/kg)。基于场景分析的关键外部因素(包括生物质类型、H2价格、补充H2的碳强度和碳税)揭示了不同市场条件下BTMP过程的4种不同最优解和BTMC过程的3种不同最优解。该框架为在不同区域背景和市场条件下实施经济上可行、环境上可持续的BTM过程提供了定量指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信