Safe pressures for suction ureteric access sheaths: in vitro conversion of pressures to flow.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Jordan Santucci,Matthew Alberto,Niranjan Sathianathen,Anne Hong,Damien Bolton,Greg Jack
{"title":"Safe pressures for suction ureteric access sheaths: in vitro conversion of pressures to flow.","authors":"Jordan Santucci,Matthew Alberto,Niranjan Sathianathen,Anne Hong,Damien Bolton,Greg Jack","doi":"10.1111/bju.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nTo convert suction pressure settings into practical, size-specific operating limits for suction ureteric access sheaths (sUAS).\r\n\r\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\r\nUsing an 8.7-F flexible ureteroscope with a standard 3.9-F working channel, we measured irrigation inflow at various pressures with no instrument, 270-μm laser fibre, and 1.9-F basket. Outflow was measured using 10/12-, 11/13-, and 12/14-F sUAS with suction applied via Neptune 3™ (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) at 30-s intervals and pressures ranging from 50 to 300 mmHg. Inflow and outflow were matched by linear interpolation deriving conservative size- and instrument-specific suction pressure limits for all evaluated sUAS configurations.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nUreteroscope irrigation inflow ranged from 30 to 130 mL/min as irrigation pressure irrigation increased from 50 cmH20 (gravity) to 300 mmHg. Working channel instruments reduced inflow: mean (± 2 × the standard error of the mean) change of -57.1% (1.6%) for the 1.9-F basket and -42.1% (2.1%) for the 270-μm laser fibre vs no instrument. Negative pressure via sUAS generated outflow as slow as 5 mL/min (10/12-F sUAS, 50 mmHg suction) and as fast as 700 mL/min (12/14-F sUAS, 300 mmHg suction). Outflow and negative pressure were linearly related (R2 0.94-0.99). Increased scope-to-sheath ratio (SSR) reduced irrigation outflow. Fully opening the valve significantly reduced outflow by 70.8% on average. The 40-cm sUAS modestly increased outflow by 13.3% on average compared to 50-cm sUAS of same diameter. Suction of 50-80 mmHg was ideal for maintaining flow equilibrium with 11/13- and 12/14-F sUAS. The small diameter and high SSR (0.87) of the 10/12-F sUAS required greater negative pressures (150-300 mmHg) to maintain flow equilibrium.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nSuction pressures as low as 50-80 mmHg are sufficient for majority of sUAS cases. Increasing irrigation inflow with pressure bag systems may counter excessive sUAS outflow; however, introducing instruments can negate this effect.","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJU International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.70012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To convert suction pressure settings into practical, size-specific operating limits for suction ureteric access sheaths (sUAS). MATERIALS AND METHODS Using an 8.7-F flexible ureteroscope with a standard 3.9-F working channel, we measured irrigation inflow at various pressures with no instrument, 270-μm laser fibre, and 1.9-F basket. Outflow was measured using 10/12-, 11/13-, and 12/14-F sUAS with suction applied via Neptune 3™ (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) at 30-s intervals and pressures ranging from 50 to 300 mmHg. Inflow and outflow were matched by linear interpolation deriving conservative size- and instrument-specific suction pressure limits for all evaluated sUAS configurations. RESULTS Ureteroscope irrigation inflow ranged from 30 to 130 mL/min as irrigation pressure irrigation increased from 50 cmH20 (gravity) to 300 mmHg. Working channel instruments reduced inflow: mean (± 2 × the standard error of the mean) change of -57.1% (1.6%) for the 1.9-F basket and -42.1% (2.1%) for the 270-μm laser fibre vs no instrument. Negative pressure via sUAS generated outflow as slow as 5 mL/min (10/12-F sUAS, 50 mmHg suction) and as fast as 700 mL/min (12/14-F sUAS, 300 mmHg suction). Outflow and negative pressure were linearly related (R2 0.94-0.99). Increased scope-to-sheath ratio (SSR) reduced irrigation outflow. Fully opening the valve significantly reduced outflow by 70.8% on average. The 40-cm sUAS modestly increased outflow by 13.3% on average compared to 50-cm sUAS of same diameter. Suction of 50-80 mmHg was ideal for maintaining flow equilibrium with 11/13- and 12/14-F sUAS. The small diameter and high SSR (0.87) of the 10/12-F sUAS required greater negative pressures (150-300 mmHg) to maintain flow equilibrium. CONCLUSIONS Suction pressures as low as 50-80 mmHg are sufficient for majority of sUAS cases. Increasing irrigation inflow with pressure bag systems may counter excessive sUAS outflow; however, introducing instruments can negate this effect.
输尿管吸入口鞘的安全压力:压力到流量的体外转换。
目的将吸引压力设置转化为实用的、特定尺寸的输尿管导管(sUAS)操作限制。材料与方法:采用8.7 f柔性输尿管镜,带标准3.9 f工作通道,在无仪器、270 μm激光光纤和1.9 f筐的情况下,测量不同压力下的灌流流量。使用10/12-,11/13-和12/14-F sUAS测量流出量,通过Neptune 3™(Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA)进行吸力,间隔30秒,压力范围为50至300 mmHg。通过线性插值匹配流入和流出,得出所有评估的sUAS配置的保守尺寸和仪器特定的吸入压力限制。结果随着灌流压力从50 cmH20(重力)增加到300 mmHg,输尿管镜灌流流量为30 ~ 130 mL/min。工作通道仪器减少了流入:1.9 f篮的平均值(±2 ×平均值的标准误差)变化为-57.1% (1.6%),270 μm激光光纤的平均值为-42.1%(2.1%)。通过sUAS产生的负压流出慢至5 mL/min (10/12-F sUAS, 50 mmHg吸力),快至700 mL/min (12/14-F sUAS, 300 mmHg吸力)。流出量与负压呈线性相关(R2 0.94 ~ 0.99)。增加的范围-鞘比(SSR)减少了灌溉流出量。阀门完全开启后,流量平均减少70.8%。与相同直径的50厘米sUAS相比,40厘米sUAS平均适度增加了13.3%的流量。50-80 mmHg的吸力对于维持11/13-和12/14-F sUAS的流动平衡是理想的。10/12-F sUAS的小直径和高SSR(0.87)需要更大的负压(150-300 mmHg)来维持流量平衡。结论大多数sUAS病例吸压50 ~ 80mmhg即可满足要求。用压力袋系统增加灌溉流入可以抵消过量的sUAS流出;然而,引入仪器可以抵消这种影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJU International
BJU International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BJUI is one of the most highly respected medical journals in the world, with a truly international range of published papers and appeal. Every issue gives invaluable practical information in the form of original articles, reviews, comments, surgical education articles, and translational science articles in the field of urology. BJUI employs topical sections, and is in full colour, making it easier to browse or search for something specific.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信