Trust‐Based Decision‐Making in the Health and Economic Domains Shows Similar Neural Correlates

IF 4.8 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Isabel Catarina Duarte, Bruno Ribeiro, Helena Jorge, Bruno Direito, Miguel Castelo‐Branco
{"title":"Trust‐Based Decision‐Making in the Health and Economic Domains Shows Similar Neural Correlates","authors":"Isabel Catarina Duarte, Bruno Ribeiro, Helena Jorge, Bruno Direito, Miguel Castelo‐Branco","doi":"10.1111/nyas.70076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How people make decisions under dyadic interactions is a relevant topic in social neuroscience, often studied using economic game theory approaches. A relevant question is whether neural correlates of neuroeconomic decision‐making can be generalized to other contexts, such as health‐related decision‐making. We developed a functional neuroimaging paradigm to study trust‐based decision‐making during patient–doctor dyadic interactions (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 35) as compared with classical investor–trustee interaction in neuroeconomic tasks. We found that the health‐related self‐consequential task activates a very similar network to the neuroeconomics one. Both proactive (higher investment) versus conservative investment attitudes and positive versus negative feedback led to very similar activation patterns between the health and the economic contexts. This shows that trust‐based decision‐making shares similar neural correlates across the economic and health domains.","PeriodicalId":8250,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.70076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How people make decisions under dyadic interactions is a relevant topic in social neuroscience, often studied using economic game theory approaches. A relevant question is whether neural correlates of neuroeconomic decision‐making can be generalized to other contexts, such as health‐related decision‐making. We developed a functional neuroimaging paradigm to study trust‐based decision‐making during patient–doctor dyadic interactions (n = 35) as compared with classical investor–trustee interaction in neuroeconomic tasks. We found that the health‐related self‐consequential task activates a very similar network to the neuroeconomics one. Both proactive (higher investment) versus conservative investment attitudes and positive versus negative feedback led to very similar activation patterns between the health and the economic contexts. This shows that trust‐based decision‐making shares similar neural correlates across the economic and health domains.
基于信任的决策在健康和经济领域显示出类似的神经关联
人们如何在二元互动下做出决策是社会神经科学中的一个相关主题,通常使用经济博弈论方法进行研究。一个相关的问题是,神经经济学决策的神经相关性是否可以推广到其他情境,如健康相关的决策。我们开发了一种功能神经成像范式来研究患者-医生二元互动(n = 35)中基于信任的决策,并将其与神经经济学任务中的经典投资者-受托人互动进行比较。我们发现,与健康相关的自我后果任务激活了一个与神经经济学非常相似的网络。无论是积极的(更高的投资)还是保守的投资态度,积极的反馈还是消极的反馈,都导致了健康和经济背景之间非常相似的激活模式。这表明基于信任的决策在经济和健康领域具有相似的神经关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
1.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences provides multidisciplinary perspectives on research of current scientific interest with far-reaching implications for the wider scientific community and society at large. Each special issue assembles the best thinking of key contributors to a field of investigation at a time when emerging developments offer the promise of new insight. Individually themed, Annals special issues stimulate new ways to think about science by providing a neutral forum for discourse—within and across many institutions and fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信