{"title":"Stiffness Parameters of the Radial Artery in Patients Undergoing Distal Transradial Coronary Angiography: A Duplex Ultrasonography Investigation.","authors":"Elton Soydan, Mustafa Akın","doi":"10.1002/ccd.70211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distal radial artery (DRA) is a feasible access in coronary angiography.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to determine the stiffness parameters of DRA and main radial artery (MRA) in pre and post-transradial catheterization by using ultrasonography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients admitted for elective distal transradial coronary angiography were consecutively enrolled from September to December 2020. Overall, Duplex analysis was assessed in 100 patients on admission and 24 h post-catheterization. Emerging two MRA occlusion and four DRA occlusion cases were excluded from statistical analysis. As a result, we had 98 measurements in MRA and 96 in the DRA adjusted for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Systolic diameter of the DRA was smaller than the MRA as 2.21 ± 0.38 versus 2.38 ± 0.38 mm (p group < 0.001). These increased to 2.4 ± 0.46 and 2.75 ± 0.47 mm, respectively, following catheterization (p group-time = 0.006). Stiffness index of the DRA was higher than the MRA (30.3 ± 26.3 vs. 22.7 ± 25.1 p = 0.601). After catheterization, this parameter significantly increased in the MRA while being preserved in the DRA (p time-group 0.032). Inversely, distensibility showed a decrease in the MRA (p time-group = 0.001) with preservation in the DRA after catheterization (p = 0.422).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DRA is smaller and shows higher stiffness index with lower distensibility than the MRA. Following catheterization, these parameters show preservation in the DRA, despite an impairment in the MRA.</p>","PeriodicalId":520583,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Distal radial artery (DRA) is a feasible access in coronary angiography.
Aims: We aimed to determine the stiffness parameters of DRA and main radial artery (MRA) in pre and post-transradial catheterization by using ultrasonography.
Methods: Patients admitted for elective distal transradial coronary angiography were consecutively enrolled from September to December 2020. Overall, Duplex analysis was assessed in 100 patients on admission and 24 h post-catheterization. Emerging two MRA occlusion and four DRA occlusion cases were excluded from statistical analysis. As a result, we had 98 measurements in MRA and 96 in the DRA adjusted for statistical analysis.
Results: Systolic diameter of the DRA was smaller than the MRA as 2.21 ± 0.38 versus 2.38 ± 0.38 mm (p group < 0.001). These increased to 2.4 ± 0.46 and 2.75 ± 0.47 mm, respectively, following catheterization (p group-time = 0.006). Stiffness index of the DRA was higher than the MRA (30.3 ± 26.3 vs. 22.7 ± 25.1 p = 0.601). After catheterization, this parameter significantly increased in the MRA while being preserved in the DRA (p time-group 0.032). Inversely, distensibility showed a decrease in the MRA (p time-group = 0.001) with preservation in the DRA after catheterization (p = 0.422).
Conclusion: DRA is smaller and shows higher stiffness index with lower distensibility than the MRA. Following catheterization, these parameters show preservation in the DRA, despite an impairment in the MRA.
背景:桡动脉远端(DRA)是冠状动脉造影中可行的通道。目的:应用超声技术测定经桡动脉置管前后DRA及桡动脉主干(MRA)的刚度参数。方法:于2020年9月至12月连续入选择期经桡动脉远端冠状动脉造影患者。总体而言,在100例患者入院时和置管后24小时进行双工分析。2例MRA闭塞和4例DRA闭塞排除在统计分析之外。结果,我们在MRA中有98个测量值,在DRA中有96个测量值进行了统计分析。结果:DRA的收缩直径小于MRA,分别为2.21±0.38 mm和2.38±0.38 mm (p组)。结论:DRA比MRA更小,具有更高的刚度指数和更低的扩张性。导管置入后,尽管MRA受损,但这些参数在DRA中显示保留。