Frailty and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Sant Kumar, Kathleen E Kearney, Christine J Chung, David Elison, Zachary L Steinberg, William L Lombardi, James M McCabe, Lorenzo Azzalini
{"title":"Frailty and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.","authors":"Sant Kumar, Kathleen E Kearney, Christine J Chung, David Elison, Zachary L Steinberg, William L Lombardi, James M McCabe, Lorenzo Azzalini","doi":"10.1002/ccd.70219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frailty has a negative impact on cardiovascular care and resource utilization.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to assess the impact of frailty on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes in a large cohort of patients undergoing PCI at a specialized referral center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included all patients undergoing PCI at our institution between 2018 and 2024. Patients were stratified by frailty using the clinical frailty scale (CFS). The primary outcome was in-hospital and 1-year all-cause mortality. Adjusted analyses were conducted with multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to evaluate associations between frailty and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5297 patients were included, with 2210 (41.7%) classified as non-frail (CFS 1-3), 1801 (34.0%) as vulnerable (CFS 4), and 1286 (24.3%) as frail (CFS 5-9). Frail patients had a higher mean age, prevalence of women, and cardiovascular comorbidities. They also exhibited a higher procedural risk profile. In adjusted analyses (IPTW), in-hospital mortality was 0.3% in non-frail versus 0.4% in vulnerable versus 2.1% in frail patients (p < 0.001). The incidence of stroke and acute kidney injury was also highest in frail patients. At 1-year, frail patients had higher rates of all-cause mortality (p < 0.001), cardiovascular mortality (p = 0.041), and stroke (p < 0.001), compared to non-frail patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Frailty is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality and long-term adverse events in PCI patients, even after controlling for clinical and procedural characteristics, highlighting the need for routine frailty assessment to improve risk stratification and guide management.</p>","PeriodicalId":520583,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Frailty has a negative impact on cardiovascular care and resource utilization.

Aims: We aimed to assess the impact of frailty on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes in a large cohort of patients undergoing PCI at a specialized referral center.

Methods: This retrospective study included all patients undergoing PCI at our institution between 2018 and 2024. Patients were stratified by frailty using the clinical frailty scale (CFS). The primary outcome was in-hospital and 1-year all-cause mortality. Adjusted analyses were conducted with multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to evaluate associations between frailty and outcomes.

Results: A total of 5297 patients were included, with 2210 (41.7%) classified as non-frail (CFS 1-3), 1801 (34.0%) as vulnerable (CFS 4), and 1286 (24.3%) as frail (CFS 5-9). Frail patients had a higher mean age, prevalence of women, and cardiovascular comorbidities. They also exhibited a higher procedural risk profile. In adjusted analyses (IPTW), in-hospital mortality was 0.3% in non-frail versus 0.4% in vulnerable versus 2.1% in frail patients (p < 0.001). The incidence of stroke and acute kidney injury was also highest in frail patients. At 1-year, frail patients had higher rates of all-cause mortality (p < 0.001), cardiovascular mortality (p = 0.041), and stroke (p < 0.001), compared to non-frail patients.

Conclusion: Frailty is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality and long-term adverse events in PCI patients, even after controlling for clinical and procedural characteristics, highlighting the need for routine frailty assessment to improve risk stratification and guide management.

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的虚弱和心血管预后。
背景:虚弱对心血管护理和资源利用有负面影响。目的:我们旨在评估虚弱对在专业转诊中心接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者结果的影响。方法:本回顾性研究纳入2018年至2024年在我院接受PCI治疗的所有患者。采用临床虚弱量表(CFS)对患者进行虚弱程度分层。主要终点是住院死亡率和1年全因死亡率。采用多变量logistic回归和治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)进行校正分析,以评估虚弱和结局之间的关联。结果:共纳入5297例患者,其中非虚弱(CFS 1-3) 2210例(41.7%),易感(CFS 4) 1801例(34.0%),虚弱(CFS 5-9) 1286例(24.3%)。体弱患者的平均年龄、女性患病率和心血管合并症较高。它们也表现出更高的程序风险。在调整分析(IPTW)中,非体弱患者的住院死亡率为0.3%,易感患者为0.4%,体弱患者为2.1% (p结论:虚弱是PCI患者住院死亡率和长期不良事件的独立预测因子,即使在控制了临床和程序特征之后,也强调了常规虚弱评估以改善风险分层和指导管理的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信