Assessment of nanomedicines and nanosimilars: Clinical pharmacists' knowledge and regulatory gaps.

IF 0.8
Courtney Fella, Mike Isles, John Hertig
{"title":"Assessment of nanomedicines and nanosimilars: Clinical pharmacists' knowledge and regulatory gaps.","authors":"Courtney Fella, Mike Isles, John Hertig","doi":"10.1177/09246479251382360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundNon-Biological Complex Drugs (NBCDs), including nanomedicines, are characterized by complex manufacturing processes. The slightest change in this process can lead to changes in the efficacy, safety, and quality of the product. New legislation to be adopted in the EU will help ensure a proper regulatory assessment which will improve patient safety. Meanwhile, there is currently no robust integrated curriculum on the use and interchangeability of nanomedicines and their respective follow-on medicine, commonly referred to as nanosimilars. Nanomedicines have been available in the EU since 1996. As the patents of these medicines expire, it is important that healthcare professionals are suitably prepared for future interchangeability programs.ObjectivesTo analyze clinical pharmacists' understanding of nanomedicines, nanosimilars, and the requirements needed to prepare the clinical ground to ensure safe and optimum interchangeability.MethodsA fourteen-question survey was constructed for clinical pharmacists in Germany, Italy, and Portugal, comprising a variety of hospital sizes and specializations. A combination of numerical ranking, yes/no, and open-ended questions was utilized.Results20 pharmacists in Germany, 9 in Italy, and 20 in Portugal completed the survey in entirety. On a scale ranging from 0 to 10, the three countries combined indicated an understanding of nanomedicines as 3.69 and their understanding of nanosimilars as 2.92. Open-ended prompts contained statements indicating the lack of clinical familiarity, regulations/policies provided, and the additional resources they would like to receive.ConclusionThe survey confirmed the need for more guidance from health-system institutions, medical agencies, and pharmaceutical manufacturers. Respondents desired opportunities to learn from webinars, newsletters, guidelines, and/or informational sessions.</p>","PeriodicalId":520800,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of risk & safety in medicine","volume":" ","pages":"87-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of risk & safety in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09246479251382360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundNon-Biological Complex Drugs (NBCDs), including nanomedicines, are characterized by complex manufacturing processes. The slightest change in this process can lead to changes in the efficacy, safety, and quality of the product. New legislation to be adopted in the EU will help ensure a proper regulatory assessment which will improve patient safety. Meanwhile, there is currently no robust integrated curriculum on the use and interchangeability of nanomedicines and their respective follow-on medicine, commonly referred to as nanosimilars. Nanomedicines have been available in the EU since 1996. As the patents of these medicines expire, it is important that healthcare professionals are suitably prepared for future interchangeability programs.ObjectivesTo analyze clinical pharmacists' understanding of nanomedicines, nanosimilars, and the requirements needed to prepare the clinical ground to ensure safe and optimum interchangeability.MethodsA fourteen-question survey was constructed for clinical pharmacists in Germany, Italy, and Portugal, comprising a variety of hospital sizes and specializations. A combination of numerical ranking, yes/no, and open-ended questions was utilized.Results20 pharmacists in Germany, 9 in Italy, and 20 in Portugal completed the survey in entirety. On a scale ranging from 0 to 10, the three countries combined indicated an understanding of nanomedicines as 3.69 and their understanding of nanosimilars as 2.92. Open-ended prompts contained statements indicating the lack of clinical familiarity, regulations/policies provided, and the additional resources they would like to receive.ConclusionThe survey confirmed the need for more guidance from health-system institutions, medical agencies, and pharmaceutical manufacturers. Respondents desired opportunities to learn from webinars, newsletters, guidelines, and/or informational sessions.

纳米药物和纳米类似物的评估:临床药师的知识和监管空白。
非生物复合药物(nbcd),包括纳米药物,其特点是复杂的制造工艺。这一过程稍有变化,就会导致产品的功效、安全性和质量发生变化。欧盟即将通过的新立法将有助于确保适当的监管评估,从而提高患者的安全。与此同时,目前还没有关于纳米药物及其各自后续药物(通常被称为纳米类似物)的使用和互换性的健全的综合课程。自1996年以来,纳米药物已经在欧盟上市。随着这些药物的专利到期,医疗保健专业人员为未来的互换性计划做好适当的准备是很重要的。目的分析临床药师对纳米药物、纳米类似物的认识,以及为确保纳米药物的安全性和最佳互换性而准备临床基础所需的条件。方法对德国、意大利和葡萄牙不同医院规模和专科的临床药师进行问卷调查,共包含14个问题。使用了数字排名,是/否和开放式问题的组合。结果德国20名药师、意大利9名药师、葡萄牙20名药师完整完成调查。在从0到10的范围内,这三个国家对纳米药物的理解为3.69分,对纳米类似物的理解为2.92分。开放式提示包括临床熟悉程度的缺乏,提供的法规/政策,以及他们希望获得的额外资源的陈述。结论调查证实了卫生系统机构、医疗机构和制药企业需要更多的指导。受访者希望有机会从网络研讨会、通讯、指南和/或信息会议中学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书