At-home, self-sampling of the skin microbiome: development of an unsupervised sampling approach.

Access microbiology Pub Date : 2025-08-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1099/acmi.0.000991.v3
J Leng, J Tyson-Carr, S Adams, M Scott, A Thomas, T Giesbrecht, N Fallon, B Murphy, M Hoptroff, C Roberts, S Paterson
{"title":"At-home, self-sampling of the skin microbiome: development of an unsupervised sampling approach.","authors":"J Leng, J Tyson-Carr, S Adams, M Scott, A Thomas, T Giesbrecht, N Fallon, B Murphy, M Hoptroff, C Roberts, S Paterson","doi":"10.1099/acmi.0.000991.v3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Large-scale skin microbiome studies are often restricted due to the need for participants to visit a research centre to have their skin swabbed by a trained individual. If samples taken by participants at home returned high-quality data, similar to that generated from samples taken by trained experts under controlled conditions, it would provide the potential for studies to have larger cohorts, include participants from multiple locations and facilitate longitudinal sample collection. Here, we describe the development of a novel unsupervised skin microbiome sample collection method and compare the data quality with that of supervised, in-lab sample collection. We enrolled 57 participants to collect skin swabs from their axillae, forearms, cheeks and scalps. Initially, samples were collected in our research centre under strict supervision by a trained expert. Participants then collected swabs from the same body sites 24 h later, unsupervised, at home, which they returned to the research centre within 3-5 days. All samples then underwent bacterial DNA extraction and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Yield of extracted bacterial DNA was different depending on body site, with the dry swabs from the forearm producing the lowest amount. There were no significant differences in alpha and beta-diversities between supervised and unsupervised sampling methods, regardless of body site. Taxonomic analysis of bacterial genera also did not differ for axilla, cheek or scalp. Our data suggest that self-sampling skin microbiome methods can produce data that are comparable to samples collected under the supervision of a trained expert in lab settings. These findings should encourage the scalability of future research and allow for greater representative population diversity in genomic and microbiome research.</p>","PeriodicalId":94366,"journal":{"name":"Access microbiology","volume":"7 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12451302/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Access microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/acmi.0.000991.v3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large-scale skin microbiome studies are often restricted due to the need for participants to visit a research centre to have their skin swabbed by a trained individual. If samples taken by participants at home returned high-quality data, similar to that generated from samples taken by trained experts under controlled conditions, it would provide the potential for studies to have larger cohorts, include participants from multiple locations and facilitate longitudinal sample collection. Here, we describe the development of a novel unsupervised skin microbiome sample collection method and compare the data quality with that of supervised, in-lab sample collection. We enrolled 57 participants to collect skin swabs from their axillae, forearms, cheeks and scalps. Initially, samples were collected in our research centre under strict supervision by a trained expert. Participants then collected swabs from the same body sites 24 h later, unsupervised, at home, which they returned to the research centre within 3-5 days. All samples then underwent bacterial DNA extraction and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Yield of extracted bacterial DNA was different depending on body site, with the dry swabs from the forearm producing the lowest amount. There were no significant differences in alpha and beta-diversities between supervised and unsupervised sampling methods, regardless of body site. Taxonomic analysis of bacterial genera also did not differ for axilla, cheek or scalp. Our data suggest that self-sampling skin microbiome methods can produce data that are comparable to samples collected under the supervision of a trained expert in lab settings. These findings should encourage the scalability of future research and allow for greater representative population diversity in genomic and microbiome research.

在家,皮肤微生物组的自采样:一种无监督采样方法的发展。
大规模的皮肤微生物组研究通常受到限制,因为参与者需要访问研究中心,由受过训练的人员擦拭他们的皮肤。如果参与者在家中采集的样本返回的高质量数据与训练有素的专家在受控条件下采集的样本产生的数据类似,那么它将为研究提供更大的队列,包括来自多个地点的参与者,并促进纵向样本收集。在这里,我们描述了一种新的无监督皮肤微生物组样本收集方法的发展,并将数据质量与有监督的实验室样本收集进行了比较。我们招募了57名参与者,从他们的腋窝、前臂、脸颊和头皮收集皮肤拭子。最初,样品是在我们的研究中心由一位训练有素的专家严格监督下收集的。24小时后,在无人监督的情况下,参与者在家中从相同的身体部位收集拭子,并在3-5天内返回研究中心。然后对所有样本进行细菌DNA提取和16S rRNA基因测序。提取细菌DNA的产量因身体部位的不同而不同,前臂的干拭子产生的量最低。无论身体部位如何,有监督和无监督取样方法在α和β多样性方面没有显著差异。腋窝、脸颊和头皮的细菌属分类分析也没有差异。我们的数据表明,自采样皮肤微生物组方法可以产生与实验室环境中训练有素的专家监督下收集的样本相当的数据。这些发现应该鼓励未来研究的可扩展性,并允许在基因组和微生物组研究中具有更大代表性的种群多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信