{"title":"Visual Outcomes Following Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Acute Central Retinal Artery Occlusion Patients.","authors":"Somanus Thoongsuwan, Thanut Sirichayaporn, Nuttawut Rodanant, Nopasak Phasukkijwatana, Supalert Prakhunhungsit, Nida Wongchaisuwat, Chinnapat Montrisuksirikun, Adisak Trinavarat, Kusuma Chinaroonchai, Supathida Jiamsawad","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S510772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of a novel HBOT protocol, characterized by specific pressure levels and treatment duration in patients with CRAO patients presenting within 24 hours, compared to a non-HBOT cohort.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with CRAO presenting within 24 hours from October 2003 to March 2022. Patients treated with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) or experiencing treatment-related visual complications were excluded. Of 49 eligible patients, 17 underwent HBOT following the novel protocol, while 32 received standard care (non-HBOT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline logMAR VA was 2.3 in both groups. At discharge, 76.5% of the HBOT group exhibited a VA improvement of at least 0.3 logMAR, compared to 40.6% in the non-HBOT group (p = 0.02). Mean logMAR VA at discharge was 1.4 ± 0.8 in the HBOT group and 2.0 ± 0.8 in the non-HBOT group. After one month, the mean logMAR VA remained at 1.4 ± 0.9 in the HBOT group and was 1.9 ± 0.9 in the non-HBOT group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While constrained by the small sample size and short-term outcome data, these results showed the benefits of this unique HBOT protocol in CRAO presenting within the critical 24-hour window. Nevertheless, further prospective validation is necessary before widespread clinical adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"3419-3429"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452972/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S510772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of a novel HBOT protocol, characterized by specific pressure levels and treatment duration in patients with CRAO patients presenting within 24 hours, compared to a non-HBOT cohort.
Patients and methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with CRAO presenting within 24 hours from October 2003 to March 2022. Patients treated with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) or experiencing treatment-related visual complications were excluded. Of 49 eligible patients, 17 underwent HBOT following the novel protocol, while 32 received standard care (non-HBOT).
Results: Baseline logMAR VA was 2.3 in both groups. At discharge, 76.5% of the HBOT group exhibited a VA improvement of at least 0.3 logMAR, compared to 40.6% in the non-HBOT group (p = 0.02). Mean logMAR VA at discharge was 1.4 ± 0.8 in the HBOT group and 2.0 ± 0.8 in the non-HBOT group. After one month, the mean logMAR VA remained at 1.4 ± 0.9 in the HBOT group and was 1.9 ± 0.9 in the non-HBOT group.
Conclusion: While constrained by the small sample size and short-term outcome data, these results showed the benefits of this unique HBOT protocol in CRAO presenting within the critical 24-hour window. Nevertheless, further prospective validation is necessary before widespread clinical adoption.