Evaluation of the efficacy of chlorous acid water and sodium hypochlorite solution against SARS-CoV-2 in the presence of organic matter.

Access microbiology Pub Date : 2025-09-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1099/acmi.0.000984.v3
Basirat Mojisola Lawal-Ayinde, Kosuke Oda, Abeer Mohamed Abdelfattah Elsayed, Tomoyuki Akita, Miuko Kurose, Hiroaki Sasaki, Toshihito Nomura, Akima Yamamoto, Akifumi Higashiura, Isanori Horiuchi, Hisataka Goda, Takemasa Sakaguchi
{"title":"Evaluation of the efficacy of chlorous acid water and sodium hypochlorite solution against SARS-CoV-2 in the presence of organic matter.","authors":"Basirat Mojisola Lawal-Ayinde, Kosuke Oda, Abeer Mohamed Abdelfattah Elsayed, Tomoyuki Akita, Miuko Kurose, Hiroaki Sasaki, Toshihito Nomura, Akima Yamamoto, Akifumi Higashiura, Isanori Horiuchi, Hisataka Goda, Takemasa Sakaguchi","doi":"10.1099/acmi.0.000984.v3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chlorous acid water and sodium hypochlorite solution are effective disinfectants against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that caused the pandemic. Recent studies have shown that both compounds have equivalent inactivation effects when tested on purified viruses. However, in practical applications, the presence of organic matter is common and can significantly affect disinfectant performance. We conducted several experiments comparing these two disinfectants under different conditions to better understand their practical efficacy. When an infected cell culture medium (serum-free) was used as the test virus, chlorous acid water and sodium hypochlorite solution showed reduced efficacy. This decrease was attributed to the presence of aa in the medium. Notably, sodium hypochlorite solution showed a more pronounced reduction in potency compared with chlorous acid water. In addition, we evaluated the SARS-CoV-2 inactivation effects of chlorous acid water and sodium hypochlorite solution under various organic loading conditions simulating real-world contamination scenarios such as blood, vomit and saliva. The organic materials used included BSA, SRBCs, polypeptone, FBS and artificial saliva. The results showed that chlorous acid water demonstrated superior resilience to organic matter interference compared with sodium hypochlorite solution. These results suggest that chlorous acid water may be more effective than sodium hypochlorite solution in inactivating viruses on contaminated surfaces, particularly in healthcare settings where organic contamination is common. In summary, our research suggests that chlorous acid water may be a more effective disinfectant in practical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94366,"journal":{"name":"Access microbiology","volume":"7 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12451309/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Access microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/acmi.0.000984.v3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chlorous acid water and sodium hypochlorite solution are effective disinfectants against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that caused the pandemic. Recent studies have shown that both compounds have equivalent inactivation effects when tested on purified viruses. However, in practical applications, the presence of organic matter is common and can significantly affect disinfectant performance. We conducted several experiments comparing these two disinfectants under different conditions to better understand their practical efficacy. When an infected cell culture medium (serum-free) was used as the test virus, chlorous acid water and sodium hypochlorite solution showed reduced efficacy. This decrease was attributed to the presence of aa in the medium. Notably, sodium hypochlorite solution showed a more pronounced reduction in potency compared with chlorous acid water. In addition, we evaluated the SARS-CoV-2 inactivation effects of chlorous acid water and sodium hypochlorite solution under various organic loading conditions simulating real-world contamination scenarios such as blood, vomit and saliva. The organic materials used included BSA, SRBCs, polypeptone, FBS and artificial saliva. The results showed that chlorous acid water demonstrated superior resilience to organic matter interference compared with sodium hypochlorite solution. These results suggest that chlorous acid water may be more effective than sodium hypochlorite solution in inactivating viruses on contaminated surfaces, particularly in healthcare settings where organic contamination is common. In summary, our research suggests that chlorous acid water may be a more effective disinfectant in practical settings.

有机物存在下氯酸水和次氯酸钠溶液对SARS-CoV-2的防治效果评价
氯酸水和次氯酸钠溶液是对引起大流行的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒-2 (SARS-CoV-2)的有效消毒剂。最近的研究表明,这两种化合物在纯化病毒上具有相同的灭活效果。然而,在实际应用中,有机物的存在是常见的,并且会显著影响消毒剂的性能。我们对这两种消毒剂在不同条件下进行了多次实验比较,以更好地了解它们的实际功效。当用感染的细胞培养基(无血清)作为试验病毒时,氯酸水和次氯酸钠溶液的效果降低。这种下降归因于培养基中aa的存在。值得注意的是,与氯酸水相比,次氯酸钠溶液的效力下降更为明显。此外,我们还模拟血液、呕吐物和唾液等真实污染场景,评估了氯酸水和次氯酸钠溶液在不同有机负荷条件下对SARS-CoV-2的灭活效果。使用的有机材料包括牛血清白蛋白、srbc、多蛋白胨、FBS和人工唾液。结果表明,与次氯酸钠溶液相比,氯酸水对有机物干扰的恢复能力更强。这些结果表明,氯酸水可能比次氯酸钠溶液更有效地灭活污染表面上的病毒,特别是在有机污染普遍存在的医疗机构中。总之,我们的研究表明,在实际环境中,氯酸水可能是一种更有效的消毒剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信