Legal protections for in vitro embryos in Paraguay and comparative contexts.

IF 2.9 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Frontiers in reproductive health Pub Date : 2025-09-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frph.2025.1633574
Evelina Gisela Lezcano, Carlos Gustavo González Morel, Eva Nara Pereira, Danilo Fernández Ríos
{"title":"Legal protections for <i>in vitro</i> embryos in Paraguay and comparative contexts.","authors":"Evelina Gisela Lezcano, Carlos Gustavo González Morel, Eva Nara Pereira, Danilo Fernández Ríos","doi":"10.3389/frph.2025.1633574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The legal protection of <i>in vitro</i> embryos in Paraguay remains unresolved because no specific legislation regulates assisted reproductive technologies. This study analysed Paraguay's constitutional framework, Civil Code, judicial rulings, and international treaties through doctrinal legal analysis, complemented by a comparative review of international regulations and jurisprudence. Findings show that the Paraguayan doctrine and courts consider conception to occur at fertilisation, while the Inter-American Court of Human Rights associates conception with implantation. This difference generates tension between domestic law and international treaty obligations. A comparative analysis with the United Kingdom, Spain, Argentina, and Italy revealed diverse regulatory models and highlighted significant gaps in Paraguayan law concerning embryo storage, research, donation, consent, and dispute resolution. This work provides a comprehensive review of the challenges that Paraguay faces in developing a regulatory framework that balances respect for constitutional principles, alignment with international obligations, and nuanced ethical considerations of human embryos and reproductive rights.</p>","PeriodicalId":73103,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in reproductive health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1633574"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12451943/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2025.1633574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The legal protection of in vitro embryos in Paraguay remains unresolved because no specific legislation regulates assisted reproductive technologies. This study analysed Paraguay's constitutional framework, Civil Code, judicial rulings, and international treaties through doctrinal legal analysis, complemented by a comparative review of international regulations and jurisprudence. Findings show that the Paraguayan doctrine and courts consider conception to occur at fertilisation, while the Inter-American Court of Human Rights associates conception with implantation. This difference generates tension between domestic law and international treaty obligations. A comparative analysis with the United Kingdom, Spain, Argentina, and Italy revealed diverse regulatory models and highlighted significant gaps in Paraguayan law concerning embryo storage, research, donation, consent, and dispute resolution. This work provides a comprehensive review of the challenges that Paraguay faces in developing a regulatory framework that balances respect for constitutional principles, alignment with international obligations, and nuanced ethical considerations of human embryos and reproductive rights.

Abstract Image

巴拉圭对体外胚胎的法律保护及其比较背景。
巴拉圭对体外胚胎的法律保护仍然没有解决,因为没有具体的立法规定辅助生殖技术。这项研究通过理论法律分析分析了巴拉圭的宪法框架、民法典、司法裁决和国际条约,并辅以对国际法规和判例的比较审查。调查结果表明,巴拉圭的学说和法院认为受孕发生在受精时,而美洲人权法院则将受孕与植入联系起来。这种差异造成了国内法和国际条约义务之间的紧张关系。一项与英国、西班牙、阿根廷和意大利的比较分析揭示了巴拉圭不同的监管模式,并突出了巴拉圭法律在胚胎储存、研究、捐赠、同意和争议解决方面的重大差距。这项工作全面回顾了巴拉圭在制定监管框架方面面临的挑战,该框架应平衡尊重宪法原则、遵守国际义务以及对人类胚胎和生殖权利的细致伦理考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信