Robert P Young, Raewyn J Scott, Zhitian Wang, Gerard A Silvestri
{"title":"Obesity Paradox and Lung Cancer Mortality: The Contributing Roles of Airflow Limitation and Pre-COPD.","authors":"Robert P Young, Raewyn J Scott, Zhitian Wang, Gerard A Silvestri","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202505-499OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increased body mass index (BMI, Kgm-2) has been consistently associated with reduced mortality from lung cancer, relative to low BMI, and termed the \"Obesity Paradox\". Whilst the basis of the obesity paradox remains unknown, mediating effects from sex, smoking status, diabetes mellitus (DM) and methodological issues (including bias), have been suggested causes. Our aim was to examine whether respiratory co-morbidity may contribute to this paradox.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this secondary analysis of 18,463 high-risk subjects participating in the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), we examined factors contributing to lung cancer mortality (primary end-point) using stratification analyses and regression models according to baseline demographics, comorbidity, specifically respiratory-related comorbidity based on lung function and/or clinical history.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>With increasing BMI, both respiratory and lung cancer (LC) mortality decreased (P<0.001), consistent with the obesity paradox. However, increasing BMI was associated with a linear decrease in the prevalence of airflow limitation (halving) and linear increases in both Pre-COPD (2-fold) and DM (8-fold) across BMI septiles (all P<0.0001). In a sequentially-constructed competing risk model for LC death, and after adjustment for smoking, age, sex, BMI and other comorbidities, we found airflow limitation, Pre-COPD and DM remained significant predictors of increased LC death(p<0.01), albeit from opposite ends of the BMI continuum. When subjects with airflow limitation, Pre-COPD and DM were sequentially removed, the obesity paradox for LC mortality was substantially attenuated and almost abolished.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We propose that the obesity paradox in high-risk ever smokers who develop lung cancer results, in large part, from the stronger deleterious effect of airflow limitation on LC mortality, with a lesser effect associated with DM-Pre-COPD, where each predominate at opposite ends of the BMI continuum.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202505-499OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Increased body mass index (BMI, Kgm-2) has been consistently associated with reduced mortality from lung cancer, relative to low BMI, and termed the "Obesity Paradox". Whilst the basis of the obesity paradox remains unknown, mediating effects from sex, smoking status, diabetes mellitus (DM) and methodological issues (including bias), have been suggested causes. Our aim was to examine whether respiratory co-morbidity may contribute to this paradox.
Methods: In this secondary analysis of 18,463 high-risk subjects participating in the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), we examined factors contributing to lung cancer mortality (primary end-point) using stratification analyses and regression models according to baseline demographics, comorbidity, specifically respiratory-related comorbidity based on lung function and/or clinical history.
Findings: With increasing BMI, both respiratory and lung cancer (LC) mortality decreased (P<0.001), consistent with the obesity paradox. However, increasing BMI was associated with a linear decrease in the prevalence of airflow limitation (halving) and linear increases in both Pre-COPD (2-fold) and DM (8-fold) across BMI septiles (all P<0.0001). In a sequentially-constructed competing risk model for LC death, and after adjustment for smoking, age, sex, BMI and other comorbidities, we found airflow limitation, Pre-COPD and DM remained significant predictors of increased LC death(p<0.01), albeit from opposite ends of the BMI continuum. When subjects with airflow limitation, Pre-COPD and DM were sequentially removed, the obesity paradox for LC mortality was substantially attenuated and almost abolished.
Interpretation: We propose that the obesity paradox in high-risk ever smokers who develop lung cancer results, in large part, from the stronger deleterious effect of airflow limitation on LC mortality, with a lesser effect associated with DM-Pre-COPD, where each predominate at opposite ends of the BMI continuum.