Collaboration, coordination, and cooperation in occupational health and safety management: perspectives of managers, human resource practitioners, and occupational health and safety representatives.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Cathrine Reineholm, Daniel Lundqvist, Christian Ståhl
{"title":"Collaboration, coordination, and cooperation in occupational health and safety management: perspectives of managers, human resource practitioners, and occupational health and safety representatives.","authors":"Cathrine Reineholm, Daniel Lundqvist, Christian Ståhl","doi":"10.1080/17482631.2025.2563399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To increase knowledge about organizations' OHSM, a specific focus should be placed on how managers, HR practitioners, and OHS representatives conduct OHSM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A content analysis was carried out based on semi-structured interviews with 18 managers, 6 HR practitioners, and 5 OHS representatives in different industries and occupations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three roles had several OHS assignments. Managers initiate, lead, and check activities; HR practitioners develop routines and guidelines (strategic approach), while OHS representatives often initiate regular safety rounds and inspections (practical approach). The organizational conditions for fulfilling their assignments varied among the three roles. In general, managers and HR practitioners had more favourable conditions, while OHS representatives were dependent on others. Collaboration took place mostly between roles involved in strategic OHSM, i.e., top management and HR practitioners, while cooperation took place between roles involved in operational OHSM, i.e., (first-line) managers and OHS representatives. Regulation-based coordination occurred in a top-down manner through HR practitioners, while reactive coordination occurred in a bottom-up manner through OHS representatives.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For more effective and successful OHSM, more developed interprofessional collaboration is needed between all involved roles. Such collaboration needs to be promoted through improved organizational conditions, regardless of role or organizational level.</p>","PeriodicalId":51468,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being","volume":"20 1","pages":"2563399"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12462417/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2025.2563399","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To increase knowledge about organizations' OHSM, a specific focus should be placed on how managers, HR practitioners, and OHS representatives conduct OHSM.

Methods: A content analysis was carried out based on semi-structured interviews with 18 managers, 6 HR practitioners, and 5 OHS representatives in different industries and occupations.

Results: All three roles had several OHS assignments. Managers initiate, lead, and check activities; HR practitioners develop routines and guidelines (strategic approach), while OHS representatives often initiate regular safety rounds and inspections (practical approach). The organizational conditions for fulfilling their assignments varied among the three roles. In general, managers and HR practitioners had more favourable conditions, while OHS representatives were dependent on others. Collaboration took place mostly between roles involved in strategic OHSM, i.e., top management and HR practitioners, while cooperation took place between roles involved in operational OHSM, i.e., (first-line) managers and OHS representatives. Regulation-based coordination occurred in a top-down manner through HR practitioners, while reactive coordination occurred in a bottom-up manner through OHS representatives.

Conclusions: For more effective and successful OHSM, more developed interprofessional collaboration is needed between all involved roles. Such collaboration needs to be promoted through improved organizational conditions, regardless of role or organizational level.

职业健康与安全管理中的协作、协调与合作:管理者、人力资源从业者和职业健康与安全代表的观点。
目的:为了增加对组织职业健康管理的认识,应该特别关注管理者、人力资源从业者和职业健康安全代表如何实施职业健康管理。方法:采用半结构化访谈法对不同行业和职业的18名管理者、6名人力资源从业人员和5名职业健康安全代表进行内容分析。结果:这三个角色都有多个OHS任务。管理者发起、领导和检查活动;人力资源从业者制定例行程序和指导方针(战略方法),而职业健康和安全代表经常启动定期的安全查房和检查(实际方法)。这三种角色完成任务的组织条件各不相同。总体而言,管理者和人力资源从业者有更有利的条件,而职业健康安全代表是依赖他人。协作主要发生在战略职业健康管理中涉及的角色之间,即最高管理层和人力资源从业者,而合作发生在操作职业健康管理中涉及的角色之间,即(一线)经理和职业健康管理代表。基于法规的协调通过人力资源从业者以自上而下的方式进行,而反应性协调通过职业健康安全代表以自下而上的方式进行。结论:为了使职业健康管理更有效和成功,需要所有相关角色之间更深入的跨专业协作。这种协作需要通过改进组织条件来促进,而不考虑角色或组织级别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
99
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being acknowledges the international and interdisciplinary nature of health-related issues. It intends to provide a meeting-point for studies using rigorous qualitative methodology of significance for issues related to human health and well-being. The aim of the International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being is to support and to shape the emerging field of qualitative studies and to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of human health and well-being.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信