From Apomediation to AImediation: Generative AI and the Reconfiguration of Informational Authority in Health Communication.

IF 2.5 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Luis M Romero-Rodriguez, Bárbara Castillo-Abdul
{"title":"From Apomediation to AImediation: Generative AI and the Reconfiguration of Informational Authority in Health Communication.","authors":"Luis M Romero-Rodriguez, Bárbara Castillo-Abdul","doi":"10.1177/21501319251381878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This conceptual paper explores the transition from apomediation to AIMediation, allowing patients or users to independently seek and access health information on their own, often using the internet and social networks, rather than relying exclusively on the intermediation of health professionals. It examines how generative artificial intelligence (GAI) reconfigures the dynamics of informational authority, access, and user autonomy in digital health environments in light of the increasing use of generative AI tools in healthcare contexts.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study examined how mediation models in health information have changed over time. It uses Eysenbach's framework and new developments in large language models (LLMs). A new model was created to compare intermediation, apomediation, and AImediation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AImediation emerges as a new paradigm in which patients or users interact directly with AI tools such as ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, or Gemini to access compiled multi-source health information. While this model retains the user autonomy characteristic of apomediation, it centralizes information flows and removes peer-based social layers. Key challenges include algorithmic opacity, prompt dependence, and the risk of misinformation due to hallucinations or biased outputs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AImediation redefines how individuals access and evaluate health information, requiring critical engagement from users and responsible development by technology providers. This framework calls for more research to determine how it affects patient actions, the roles of professionals, and the ethical use of AI in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":46723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","volume":"16 ","pages":"21501319251381878"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12461036/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319251381878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This conceptual paper explores the transition from apomediation to AIMediation, allowing patients or users to independently seek and access health information on their own, often using the internet and social networks, rather than relying exclusively on the intermediation of health professionals. It examines how generative artificial intelligence (GAI) reconfigures the dynamics of informational authority, access, and user autonomy in digital health environments in light of the increasing use of generative AI tools in healthcare contexts.

Method: This study examined how mediation models in health information have changed over time. It uses Eysenbach's framework and new developments in large language models (LLMs). A new model was created to compare intermediation, apomediation, and AImediation.

Results: AImediation emerges as a new paradigm in which patients or users interact directly with AI tools such as ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, or Gemini to access compiled multi-source health information. While this model retains the user autonomy characteristic of apomediation, it centralizes information flows and removes peer-based social layers. Key challenges include algorithmic opacity, prompt dependence, and the risk of misinformation due to hallucinations or biased outputs.

Conclusion: AImediation redefines how individuals access and evaluate health information, requiring critical engagement from users and responsible development by technology providers. This framework calls for more research to determine how it affects patient actions, the roles of professionals, and the ethical use of AI in healthcare.

从调解到AImediation:生成性AI与健康传播中的信息权威重构。
目的:这篇概念论文探讨了从调解到AIMediation的转变,允许患者或用户独立地寻求和获取自己的健康信息,通常使用互联网和社交网络,而不是完全依赖于卫生专业人员的中介。它研究了在医疗保健环境中越来越多地使用生成人工智能工具的情况下,生成人工智能(GAI)如何在数字健康环境中重新配置信息权威、访问和用户自主权的动态。方法:本研究考察了健康信息的中介模型是如何随时间变化的。它使用了Eysenbach的框架和大型语言模型(llm)的新发展。创建了一个新的模型来比较中介、调解和AImediation。结果:AImediation作为一种新的范例出现,在这种范式中,患者或用户直接与ChatGPT、Claude、Perplexity或Gemini等人工智能工具进行交互,以访问编译的多源健康信息。该模型保留了调解的用户自治特性,并集中了信息流,消除了基于对等的社会层。主要挑战包括算法不透明、即时依赖以及由于幻觉或有偏见的输出而产生错误信息的风险。结论:AImediation重新定义了个人获取和评估卫生信息的方式,需要用户的关键参与和技术提供者负责任的开发。这一框架要求进行更多的研究,以确定它如何影响患者的行为、专业人员的角色以及人工智能在医疗保健中的道德使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
183
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信