The Association Between Salivary Function and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Measured Objectively.

IF 2.4 4区医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY

Journal of Voice Pub Date : 2025-09-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.09.003

So Young Jeon, Hwa Sung Rim, Yeonseo Lee, Jung Min Park, Min Kyeong Lee, Su Il Kim, Young Chan Lee, Young-Gyu Eun

{"title":"The Association Between Salivary Function and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Measured Objectively.","authors":"So Young Jeon, Hwa Sung Rim, Yeonseo Lee, Jung Min Park, Min Kyeong Lee, Su Il Kim, Young Chan Lee, Young-Gyu Eun","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the association between salivary function measured by salivary flow rate (SFR) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in patients with symptoms completed 24-hour hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (24-h-HEMII-pH) monitoring.Methods: Patients with LPR symptoms underwent the 24-h-HEMII-pH monitoring and SFR was measured. We compared the SFR differences between LPR and non-LPR groups.Results: Sixty-seven of 80 (84%) patients were diagnosed with LPR. The mean unstimulated SFR of the LPR and non-LPR groups was 0.48 and 0.52 mL/min (P = 0.735). The mean stimulated SFR of the LPR and non-LPR groups was 2.5 and 2.3 mL/min (P = 0.610). In the LPR group and non-LPR group, the reflux symptom index (RSI) of the normal and abnormal SFR groups was not significantly differnt (P = 0.27 and P = 0.454).Conclusions: There was no significant difference in salivary function between patients with LPR and non-LPR.","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.09.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the association between salivary function measured by salivary flow rate (SFR) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in patients with symptoms completed 24-hour hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (24-h-HEMII-pH) monitoring.

Methods: Patients with LPR symptoms underwent the 24-h-HEMII-pH monitoring and SFR was measured. We compared the SFR differences between LPR and non-LPR groups.

Results: Sixty-seven of 80 (84%) patients were diagnosed with LPR. The mean unstimulated SFR of the LPR and non-LPR groups was 0.48 and 0.52 mL/min (P = 0.735). The mean stimulated SFR of the LPR and non-LPR groups was 2.5 and 2.3 mL/min (P = 0.610). In the LPR group and non-LPR group, the reflux symptom index (RSI) of the normal and abnormal SFR groups was not significantly differnt (P = 0.27 and P = 0.454).

Conclusions: There was no significant difference in salivary function between patients with LPR and non-LPR.

查看原文本刊更多论文

客观测量唾液功能与咽喉反流的关系。

目的：探讨完成24小时下咽-食管多道腔内阻抗- ph （24-h-HEMII-pH）监测的有症状患者唾液流率（SFR）测定的唾液功能与喉咽反流（LPR）的关系。方法：对有LPR症状的患者进行24 h- hemii - ph监测，并测定SFR。我们比较了LPR组和非LPR组的SFR差异。结果：80例患者中67例（84%）诊断为LPR。LPR组和非LPR组平均无刺激SFR分别为0.48和0.52 mL/min （P = 0.735）。LPR组和非LPR组的平均刺激SFR分别为2.5和2.3 mL/min （P = 0.610）。在LPR组和非LPR组中，SFR正常组和异常组的反流症状指数（RSI）差异无统计学意义（P = 0.27和P = 0.454）。结论：LPR患者与非LPR患者的唾液功能无显著差异。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学

CiteScore

4.00

自引率

13.60%

发文量

395

审稿时长

59 days

期刊介绍： The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.