What Factors Affect Safe Bedside Extubation After Mandibular Distraction?

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Cory M Resnick, Andrew J Deek, Ryan Caprio, Snigdha Jindal, Faye Evans, Raymond Park
{"title":"What Factors Affect Safe Bedside Extubation After Mandibular Distraction?","authors":"Cory M Resnick, Andrew J Deek, Ryan Caprio, Snigdha Jindal, Faye Evans, Raymond Park","doi":"10.1177/10556656251381160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThere is no universal protocol for extubation following mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) surgery in infants with Robin sequence (RS). The aims of this study were to identify the frequency and contributing factors for reintubation after MDO, to help determine the optimal setting for planned extubation.DesignThis is a retrospective observational study of patients with RS managed with MDO during their first year of life from 2013 to 2021.Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary outcome variable was the need for reintubation <24 h after extubation. A secondary outcome was the frequency of oxygen saturation <95% after extubation.ResultsFifty-two subjects were included. Of these, 31 (59.6%) were male, 43 (82.7%) had a cleft palate, 19 (36.5%) were syndromic, and 24 (46.2%) had ≥1 comorbidity. Extubation was at 3.6 ± 2.4 days after surgery and 1 patient (1.9%) required reintubation. Forty-one (78.8%) had ≥1 transient oxygen desaturation managed with supplemental oxygen (<i>n</i> = 25, 61%) or continuous positive airway pressure (<i>n</i> = 16, 39%). Increased risk for postextubation respiratory events was associated with Stickler syndrome (<i>P</i> = .01), musculoskeletal, neurologic, or endocrine comorbidities (<i>P</i> < .001), low birthweight (<i>P</i> = .044), and high preoperative obstructive Apnea-Hypopnea Index (<i>P</i> = .037).Conclusions and RelevanceReintubation was rare and minor postextubation oxygen desaturations, while common, were readily treated utilizing standard intensive care unit protocols. We conclude that most infants with RS can be safely extubated in their care unit following MDO. This minimizes medical resources, decreases hospital charges, and simplifies patient management compared to returning to the operating room for extubation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"10556656251381160"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656251381160","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveThere is no universal protocol for extubation following mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) surgery in infants with Robin sequence (RS). The aims of this study were to identify the frequency and contributing factors for reintubation after MDO, to help determine the optimal setting for planned extubation.DesignThis is a retrospective observational study of patients with RS managed with MDO during their first year of life from 2013 to 2021.Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary outcome variable was the need for reintubation <24 h after extubation. A secondary outcome was the frequency of oxygen saturation <95% after extubation.ResultsFifty-two subjects were included. Of these, 31 (59.6%) were male, 43 (82.7%) had a cleft palate, 19 (36.5%) were syndromic, and 24 (46.2%) had ≥1 comorbidity. Extubation was at 3.6 ± 2.4 days after surgery and 1 patient (1.9%) required reintubation. Forty-one (78.8%) had ≥1 transient oxygen desaturation managed with supplemental oxygen (n = 25, 61%) or continuous positive airway pressure (n = 16, 39%). Increased risk for postextubation respiratory events was associated with Stickler syndrome (P = .01), musculoskeletal, neurologic, or endocrine comorbidities (P < .001), low birthweight (P = .044), and high preoperative obstructive Apnea-Hypopnea Index (P = .037).Conclusions and RelevanceReintubation was rare and minor postextubation oxygen desaturations, while common, were readily treated utilizing standard intensive care unit protocols. We conclude that most infants with RS can be safely extubated in their care unit following MDO. This minimizes medical resources, decreases hospital charges, and simplifies patient management compared to returning to the operating room for extubation.

影响下颌牵引术后床边拔管安全的因素有哪些?
目的对患有Robin序列(RS)的婴儿进行下颌牵张成骨(MDO)手术后拔管尚无统一的方案。本研究的目的是确定MDO后再拔管的频率和影响因素,以帮助确定计划拔管的最佳设置。这是一项回顾性观察性研究,研究对象是2013年至2021年期间接受MDO治疗的RS患者。主要结局指标主要结局变量为是否需要再插管(n = 25,61%)或持续气道正压(n = 16,39%)。拔管后呼吸事件的风险增加与Stickler综合征相关(P =。01)、肌肉骨骼、神经系统或内分泌合并症(P =。044),术前阻塞性呼吸暂停低通气指数较高(P = .037)。结论和相关性:插管是罕见的,拔管后轻微的氧饱和度降低,虽然很常见,但很容易使用标准的重症监护病房方案进行治疗。我们的结论是,大多数RS婴儿在MDO后可以安全地拔管。与返回手术室拔管相比,这最大限度地减少了医疗资源,降低了医院费用,简化了患者管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信