Evaluation of Adherence to Pharmacological Treatment in a Large Sample of Patients with Personality Disorder.

IF 2.4 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Maddalena Cocchi, Nicolaja Girone, Matteo Leonardi, Francesco Achilli, Beatrice Benatti, Bernardo dell'Osso
{"title":"Evaluation of Adherence to Pharmacological Treatment in a Large Sample of Patients with Personality Disorder.","authors":"Maddalena Cocchi, Nicolaja Girone, Matteo Leonardi, Francesco Achilli, Beatrice Benatti, Bernardo dell'Osso","doi":"10.36131/cnfioritieditore20250402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Personality disorders (PDs) are chronic and pervasive mental health conditions associated with significant functional impairment and high psychiatric comorbidity. Although psychotherapeutic interventions are the primary treatment approach, pharmacotherapy is frequently prescribed to manage specific symptoms. However, adherence to pharmacological treatment in PDs remains a critical challenge, influenced by both personality traits and clinical factors. The present study aims to assess adherence rates in a large cohort of patients with PDs and explore potential sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with compliance.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This observational study included 200 patients diagnosed with PDs according to DSM-5 criteria, recruited from different psychiatric services in Milan, Italy. Adherence was assessed using the Clinician Rating Scale (CRS), with positive adherence defined as CRS ≥ 5 and poor adherence as CRS < 5. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected and analyzed across adherence groups and PD clusters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Positive adherence was observed in 64.5% of the sample. Cluster C PDs exhibited significantly higher adherence rates (83.3%) compared to Cluster B (61.3%), mixed-feature (60%), and Cluster A (73.3%; p<.05). A positive family history of psychiatric disorders was associated with greater adherence (60.3% vs. 45.5%, p<.05). A trend toward lower adherence was observed in patients with lifetime and current substance use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher adherence in Cluster C PDs may be linked to anxiety-driven behavioral patterns, while lower adherence in Cluster B and mixed-feature PDs suggests impulsivity and mistrust contribute to non-compliance. Additionally, a positive family history of psychiatric disorders emerged as a potential protective factor, possibly enhancing treatment engagement through greater awareness and support networks. Future research should focus on developing tailored interventions to the specific needs of different PD clusters to improve long-term treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46700,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychiatry","volume":"22 4","pages":"279-286"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453032/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20250402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Personality disorders (PDs) are chronic and pervasive mental health conditions associated with significant functional impairment and high psychiatric comorbidity. Although psychotherapeutic interventions are the primary treatment approach, pharmacotherapy is frequently prescribed to manage specific symptoms. However, adherence to pharmacological treatment in PDs remains a critical challenge, influenced by both personality traits and clinical factors. The present study aims to assess adherence rates in a large cohort of patients with PDs and explore potential sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with compliance.

Method: This observational study included 200 patients diagnosed with PDs according to DSM-5 criteria, recruited from different psychiatric services in Milan, Italy. Adherence was assessed using the Clinician Rating Scale (CRS), with positive adherence defined as CRS ≥ 5 and poor adherence as CRS < 5. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected and analyzed across adherence groups and PD clusters.

Results: Positive adherence was observed in 64.5% of the sample. Cluster C PDs exhibited significantly higher adherence rates (83.3%) compared to Cluster B (61.3%), mixed-feature (60%), and Cluster A (73.3%; p<.05). A positive family history of psychiatric disorders was associated with greater adherence (60.3% vs. 45.5%, p<.05). A trend toward lower adherence was observed in patients with lifetime and current substance use.

Conclusions: Higher adherence in Cluster C PDs may be linked to anxiety-driven behavioral patterns, while lower adherence in Cluster B and mixed-feature PDs suggests impulsivity and mistrust contribute to non-compliance. Additionally, a positive family history of psychiatric disorders emerged as a potential protective factor, possibly enhancing treatment engagement through greater awareness and support networks. Future research should focus on developing tailored interventions to the specific needs of different PD clusters to improve long-term treatment outcomes.

大样本人格障碍患者对药物治疗依从性的评估。
目的:人格障碍(pd)是一种慢性和普遍的心理健康状况,与显著的功能障碍和高精神合并症有关。虽然心理治疗干预是主要的治疗方法,但药物治疗经常用于治疗特定症状。然而,在人格特征和临床因素的影响下,pd患者坚持药物治疗仍然是一个关键的挑战。本研究旨在评估一大批pd患者的依从率,并探讨与依从性相关的潜在社会人口统计学和临床因素。方法:本观察性研究纳入了200名根据DSM-5标准诊断为pd的患者,这些患者来自意大利米兰不同的精神科服务机构。采用临床医师评定量表(CRS)评估依从性,积极依从性定义为CRS≥5,不良依从性定义为CRS < 5。收集并分析了依从性组和PD组的社会人口学和临床数据。结果:64.5%的样品呈阳性粘附。与B组(61.3%)、混合特征组(60%)和A组(73.3%)相比,C组患者的依从率(83.3%)显著高于B组(61.3%)、混合特征组(60%)和A组(73.3%)。结论:C组患者的高依从性可能与焦虑驱动的行为模式有关,而B组和混合特征组患者的低依从性表明冲动和不信任是导致不依从性的原因。此外,积极的精神疾病家族史成为潜在的保护因素,可能通过提高意识和支持网络来提高治疗参与度。未来的研究应侧重于针对不同PD群的具体需求开发量身定制的干预措施,以改善长期治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychiatry
Clinical Neuropsychiatry CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信