Safety and diagnostic yield of robotic-assisted stereotactic biopsy for pediatric brainstem lesions: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Jianqiang Zhao, Cheng Guo, Guolong Zhang
{"title":"Safety and diagnostic yield of robotic-assisted stereotactic biopsy for pediatric brainstem lesions: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.","authors":"Jianqiang Zhao, Cheng Guo, Guolong Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02816-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pediatric brainstem lesions pose significant diagnostic challenges due to their deep-seated location and critical neuroanatomical surroundings. Robotic-assisted stereotactic biopsy has emerged as a promising minimally invasive strategy, yet its safety and efficacy in this vulnerable population remain incompletely defined. We conducted a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration: CRD420251135743). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to May 2025. Eligible studies included pediatric patients (≤ 18 years) with radiologically confirmed brainstem lesions who underwent robot-assisted stereotactic biopsy with reported histopathological and postoperative outcomes. Data were pooled using either a fixed-effects or random-effects model (DerSimonian-Laird) with Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation, depending on the degree of heterogeneity. From 72 records, 15 studies comprising 215 pediatric patients were included. Robotic systems evaluated included Neuromate, ROSA, Sino-Precision, and Autoguide, using both frameless and frame-based approaches. The pooled rate of technically efficacious biopsy was 99% (95% CI 98-100%), and the conclusive diagnostic yield was 98% (95% CI 93-98%). Molecular profiling was feasible, with an H3 K27-altered positivity rate of 77% (95% CI 54-94%). The pooled rate of temporary complications was 6% (95% CI 2-11%), mainly transient cranial nerve palsies or mild weakness, while permanent morbidity occurred in only 2 patients (1 hemiparesis and 1 cranial nerve XI/XII palsy), both following frameless procedures. No procedure-related mortality was reported. Subgroup analyses confirmed comparable diagnostic yield between frameless and frame-based systems, though permanent morbidity was observed only in the frameless cohort. The mean hospital stay was 2.08 days (95% CI 1.91-2.25 days), reflecting rapid postoperative recovery. Robotic-assisted stereotactic biopsy of pediatric brainstem lesions provides near-universal diagnostic yield with a favorable safety profile, supporting its role as a reliable minimally invasive approach in this high-risk setting. Both frameless and frame-based systems are effective, although rare permanent deficits have been reported with frameless techniques. Future multicenter randomized trials are warranted to directly compare robotic and conventional stereotactic methods, standardize perioperative outcome reporting, and further evaluate the contribution of robotic biopsy to molecular diagnostics and precision medicine in pediatric neuro-oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"629"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02816-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pediatric brainstem lesions pose significant diagnostic challenges due to their deep-seated location and critical neuroanatomical surroundings. Robotic-assisted stereotactic biopsy has emerged as a promising minimally invasive strategy, yet its safety and efficacy in this vulnerable population remain incompletely defined. We conducted a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration: CRD420251135743). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to May 2025. Eligible studies included pediatric patients (≤ 18 years) with radiologically confirmed brainstem lesions who underwent robot-assisted stereotactic biopsy with reported histopathological and postoperative outcomes. Data were pooled using either a fixed-effects or random-effects model (DerSimonian-Laird) with Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation, depending on the degree of heterogeneity. From 72 records, 15 studies comprising 215 pediatric patients were included. Robotic systems evaluated included Neuromate, ROSA, Sino-Precision, and Autoguide, using both frameless and frame-based approaches. The pooled rate of technically efficacious biopsy was 99% (95% CI 98-100%), and the conclusive diagnostic yield was 98% (95% CI 93-98%). Molecular profiling was feasible, with an H3 K27-altered positivity rate of 77% (95% CI 54-94%). The pooled rate of temporary complications was 6% (95% CI 2-11%), mainly transient cranial nerve palsies or mild weakness, while permanent morbidity occurred in only 2 patients (1 hemiparesis and 1 cranial nerve XI/XII palsy), both following frameless procedures. No procedure-related mortality was reported. Subgroup analyses confirmed comparable diagnostic yield between frameless and frame-based systems, though permanent morbidity was observed only in the frameless cohort. The mean hospital stay was 2.08 days (95% CI 1.91-2.25 days), reflecting rapid postoperative recovery. Robotic-assisted stereotactic biopsy of pediatric brainstem lesions provides near-universal diagnostic yield with a favorable safety profile, supporting its role as a reliable minimally invasive approach in this high-risk setting. Both frameless and frame-based systems are effective, although rare permanent deficits have been reported with frameless techniques. Future multicenter randomized trials are warranted to directly compare robotic and conventional stereotactic methods, standardize perioperative outcome reporting, and further evaluate the contribution of robotic biopsy to molecular diagnostics and precision medicine in pediatric neuro-oncology.

儿童脑干病变机器人辅助立体定向活检的安全性和诊断率:系统回顾和单臂荟萃分析。
小儿脑干病变由于其深层位置和关键的神经解剖环境,对诊断提出了重大挑战。机器人辅助立体定向活检已成为一种很有前途的微创策略,但其在这一脆弱人群中的安全性和有效性仍未完全确定。我们按照PRISMA指南(PROSPERO注册号:CRD420251135743)进行了系统评价和单臂荟萃分析。PubMed, Embase, Web of Science和Cochrane Library从成立到2025年5月被检索。符合条件的研究包括放射学证实脑干病变的儿童患者(≤18岁),接受机器人辅助立体定向活检并报告组织病理学和术后结果。根据异质性的程度,使用固定效应或随机效应模型(dersimonan - laird)与Freeman-Tukey双反正弦变换合并数据。从72份记录中,纳入了15项研究,包括215名儿科患者。评估的机器人系统包括Neuromate、ROSA、Sino-Precision和Autoguide,采用无框架和基于框架的方法。技术上有效的活检合并率为99% (95% CI 98-100%),结论性诊断率为98% (95% CI 93-98%)。分子谱分析是可行的,H3 k27改变的阳性率为77% (95% CI 54-94%)。暂时性并发症的总发生率为6% (95% CI 2-11%),主要是短暂性脑神经麻痹或轻度无力,而永久性发病率仅发生在2例患者中(1例偏瘫和1例脑神经XI/XII麻痹),两者均采用无框手术。无手术相关死亡率报告。亚组分析证实无框架和基于框架的系统之间的诊断率相当,尽管只有在无框架队列中观察到永久性发病率。平均住院时间为2.08天(95% CI 1.91-2.25天),术后恢复迅速。机器人辅助的儿童脑干病变立体定向活检提供了近乎普遍的诊断率和良好的安全性,支持其在这种高风险环境中作为可靠的微创方法的作用。无框架和基于框架的系统都是有效的,尽管无框架技术报道了罕见的永久性缺陷。未来的多中心随机试验有必要直接比较机器人和传统立体定向方法,标准化围手术期结果报告,并进一步评估机器人活检对儿童神经肿瘤学分子诊断和精准医学的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信