Increasing the exposure to clinical experiences in undergraduate medical training through enrichment activities in primary care.

IF 1.1 Q3 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Daniel Crowfoot, Suzan Ghannam, Gurvinder Sahota, Jaspal Taggar
{"title":"Increasing the exposure to clinical experiences in undergraduate medical training through enrichment activities in primary care.","authors":"Daniel Crowfoot, Suzan Ghannam, Gurvinder Sahota, Jaspal Taggar","doi":"10.1080/14739879.2025.2558010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increasing the number of UK medical graduates entering GP training is a national priority. However, GP practices' capacity to offer meaningful placements is challenging. Enrichment activities (EA) may provide an opportunity to increase capacity and exposure to primary care learning experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An EA was any observational/interactive activity outside of core curricular experiences in primary care. GP practices provided options for EAs which were delivered to final year medical students in September 2023. Feedback surveys, comprising closed Likert-scale and open free-text questions, sought to determine student and provider views about the utility of EAs for learning experiences, satisfaction, and influence on career choices in GP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 217 sessions (21.7 weeks) of EAs were undertaken. The most popular EA was working with GPs with an extended role. There was high satisfaction from providers and students. Of students, 77% felt welcomed by providers; 84.7% recommended EAs to others; 61.6% reported added value to their education. Most students were more likely to choose a future career in GP. Of providers, 95% reported value in enhancing student learning; 90% found preparation for EAs easy. Enabling themes for EAs were student engagement; insights into GP roles; exposure to unique clinical experiences. Barriers to EAs were organisational challenges by providers; more time for EAs; greater hands-on opportunities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EAs provide opportunities to improve the variety and capacity of learning experiences in primary care with high levels of student and provider satisfaction. EAs may also promote more undergraduates to choose a career in GP.</p>","PeriodicalId":46436,"journal":{"name":"Education for Primary Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2025.2558010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Increasing the number of UK medical graduates entering GP training is a national priority. However, GP practices' capacity to offer meaningful placements is challenging. Enrichment activities (EA) may provide an opportunity to increase capacity and exposure to primary care learning experiences.

Methods: An EA was any observational/interactive activity outside of core curricular experiences in primary care. GP practices provided options for EAs which were delivered to final year medical students in September 2023. Feedback surveys, comprising closed Likert-scale and open free-text questions, sought to determine student and provider views about the utility of EAs for learning experiences, satisfaction, and influence on career choices in GP.

Results: In total, 217 sessions (21.7 weeks) of EAs were undertaken. The most popular EA was working with GPs with an extended role. There was high satisfaction from providers and students. Of students, 77% felt welcomed by providers; 84.7% recommended EAs to others; 61.6% reported added value to their education. Most students were more likely to choose a future career in GP. Of providers, 95% reported value in enhancing student learning; 90% found preparation for EAs easy. Enabling themes for EAs were student engagement; insights into GP roles; exposure to unique clinical experiences. Barriers to EAs were organisational challenges by providers; more time for EAs; greater hands-on opportunities.

Conclusion: EAs provide opportunities to improve the variety and capacity of learning experiences in primary care with high levels of student and provider satisfaction. EAs may also promote more undergraduates to choose a career in GP.

通过初级保健的丰富活动,增加本科医学培训的临床经验。
背景:增加英国医学毕业生进入全科医生培训的人数是国家的优先事项。然而,全科医生提供有意义的实习机会的能力是具有挑战性的。丰富活动(EA)可以提供一个机会,提高能力和接触初级保健学习经验。方法:EA是在初级保健核心课程体验之外的任何观察/互动活动。全科医生的做法提供了各种选择,这些选择于2023年9月提供给最后一年的医科学生。反馈调查包括封闭的李克特量表和开放的自由文本问题,旨在确定学生和提供者对学习经验、满意度和GP职业选择影响的ea效用的看法。结果:共进行了217次(21.7周)ea治疗。最受欢迎的EA是与具有扩展角色的gp合作。服务提供者和学生的满意度都很高。在学生中,77%的人觉得自己受到了学校的欢迎;84.7%的人向他人推荐ea;61.6%的人认为他们的教育增加了价值。大多数学生更有可能选择GP的未来职业。在提供服务的机构中,95%的机构报告了在促进学生学习方面的价值;90%的人认为ea的制备很容易。对ea有利的主题是学生参与;对全科医生角色的洞察;接触独特的临床经验。ea的障碍是供应商面临的组织挑战;给ea更多的时间;更多的实践机会。结论:ea为提高初级保健学习体验的多样性和能力提供了机会,学生和提供者的满意度都很高。ea也可能促使更多的本科生选择GP这一职业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education for Primary Care
Education for Primary Care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Education for Primary Care aims to reflect the best experience, expertise and innovative ideas in the development of undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing primary care education. The journal is UK based but welcomes contributions from all over the world. Readers will benefit from the broader perspectives on educational activities provided through the contributions of all health professionals, including general practitioners, nurses, midwives, health visitors, community nurses and managers. This sharing of experiences has the potential for enhancing healthcare delivery and for promoting interprofessional working.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信