Patient preferences for violence screening in HIV care settings.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Ameeta S Kalokhe, Katherine M Anderson, Madelyn S Carlson, Celeste K Ellison, Sophia C Garbarino, Selaem Hadera, Caroline W Kokubun, Eve Rose, Jessica M Sales
{"title":"Patient preferences for violence screening in HIV care settings.","authors":"Ameeta S Kalokhe, Katherine M Anderson, Madelyn S Carlson, Celeste K Ellison, Sophia C Garbarino, Selaem Hadera, Caroline W Kokubun, Eve Rose, Jessica M Sales","doi":"10.1080/09540121.2025.2562243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Experiences of interpersonal- and community-level violence are common among people with HIV (PWH) and associated with poor health outcomes, underscoring a need to implement violence screening and support in HIV care. To inform this implementation, we explored preferences of PWH regarding integration of violence screening into HIV care. From February-December 2022, 64 in-depth interviews were conducted with PWH in Atlanta, Georgia as part of a larger mixed-methods study. Participants were purposively selected for diversity of gender, race/ethnicity, violence exposure history, HIV viral suppression, and retention in care. Themes explored included acceptability of violence screening in HIV care and preferences for doing so (in-person, paper-pencil, computerized), screening item phrasing, screening environment (by whom, where), timing of initial screen, and screening frequency. Violence screening in HIV care was highly acceptable and desirable. Collectively, preference was voiced for initiating screening at first HIV care visit and conducting screening regularly thereafter, in-person, by healthcare providers in a trauma-informed, conversational manner, with supplementation by telehealth or computerized comprehensive screeners to accommodate a variety of needs. This study, the first to detail preferences of PWH across gender and retention/viral suppression status, fills a key gap in evidence informing violence screening recommendations in national HIV care guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":48370,"journal":{"name":"Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/hiv","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/hiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2025.2562243","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Experiences of interpersonal- and community-level violence are common among people with HIV (PWH) and associated with poor health outcomes, underscoring a need to implement violence screening and support in HIV care. To inform this implementation, we explored preferences of PWH regarding integration of violence screening into HIV care. From February-December 2022, 64 in-depth interviews were conducted with PWH in Atlanta, Georgia as part of a larger mixed-methods study. Participants were purposively selected for diversity of gender, race/ethnicity, violence exposure history, HIV viral suppression, and retention in care. Themes explored included acceptability of violence screening in HIV care and preferences for doing so (in-person, paper-pencil, computerized), screening item phrasing, screening environment (by whom, where), timing of initial screen, and screening frequency. Violence screening in HIV care was highly acceptable and desirable. Collectively, preference was voiced for initiating screening at first HIV care visit and conducting screening regularly thereafter, in-person, by healthcare providers in a trauma-informed, conversational manner, with supplementation by telehealth or computerized comprehensive screeners to accommodate a variety of needs. This study, the first to detail preferences of PWH across gender and retention/viral suppression status, fills a key gap in evidence informing violence screening recommendations in national HIV care guidelines.

艾滋病毒护理机构中患者对暴力筛查的偏好。
人际和社区暴力的经历在艾滋病毒感染者(PWH)中很常见,并与不良健康结果有关,这突出表明有必要在艾滋病毒护理中实施暴力筛查和支持。为了为这一实施提供信息,我们探讨了PWH对将暴力筛查纳入艾滋病毒护理的偏好。从2022年2月至12月,在佐治亚州亚特兰大与PWH进行了64次深度访谈,作为更大的混合方法研究的一部分。参与者的性别、种族/民族、暴力暴露史、HIV病毒抑制和护理保留的多样性是有目的选择的。探讨的主题包括艾滋病毒护理中暴力筛查的可接受性和偏好(亲自,纸笔,电脑),筛查项目措辞,筛查环境(由谁,在哪里),初始筛查的时间和筛查频率。艾滋病毒护理中的暴力筛查是高度可接受和可取的。总的来说,人们倾向于在第一次艾滋病毒护理就诊时开始筛查,之后由卫生保健提供者以了解创伤情况的对话方式定期亲自进行筛查,并辅以远程保健或计算机化综合筛查,以适应各种需求。这项研究首次详细介绍了PWH在性别和保留/病毒抑制状态方面的偏好,填补了国家艾滋病毒护理指南中暴力筛查建议证据的关键空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
172
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信