It Takes a Village: Developing a Summative Evaluation Process to Meet Programmatic Needs.

Q2 Health Professions
Michel Statler, Elizabeth Johnston, Jessica White, Temple Howell-Stampley
{"title":"It Takes a Village: Developing a Summative Evaluation Process to Meet Programmatic Needs.","authors":"Michel Statler, Elizabeth Johnston, Jessica White, Temple Howell-Stampley","doi":"10.1097/JPA.0000000000000705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>All physician assistant (PA) programs are required per accreditation Standard B4.03 to complete a summative evaluation to verify that their soon-to-be graduates have successfully met the program-defined competencies and are ready to transition into clinical practice. In 2019, the PA Program at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center updated the summative evaluation process to incorporate the PA Education Association End of Curriculum exam, to convert to online formatting for the Clinical Skills examination and situational judgement tests, and to introduce an eight station objective structure clinical examination component. All 4 components of the summative were mapped to the program-defined competencies, elements of Standard B4.03, and the Competencies for the PA Profession. Cut scores were defined for each component of the summative and remediation activities were designed to address knowledge deficiencies prior to retesting. To date, all students over the past 6 cohorts have successfully completed the objective structure clinical examination and situational judgement test components. There have been isolated failures of the end of curriculum and clinical skills exams which were successfully remediated on the first attempt. Administration of the summative evaluation requires planning and coordination throughout the academic cycle to develop materials for all components, schedule coordination with the simulation center, training of simulated patients, faculty development for consistency in grading, oversight of remediation activities, and triangulation of data to correlate the results of the summative evaluation with other programmatic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":39231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: All physician assistant (PA) programs are required per accreditation Standard B4.03 to complete a summative evaluation to verify that their soon-to-be graduates have successfully met the program-defined competencies and are ready to transition into clinical practice. In 2019, the PA Program at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center updated the summative evaluation process to incorporate the PA Education Association End of Curriculum exam, to convert to online formatting for the Clinical Skills examination and situational judgement tests, and to introduce an eight station objective structure clinical examination component. All 4 components of the summative were mapped to the program-defined competencies, elements of Standard B4.03, and the Competencies for the PA Profession. Cut scores were defined for each component of the summative and remediation activities were designed to address knowledge deficiencies prior to retesting. To date, all students over the past 6 cohorts have successfully completed the objective structure clinical examination and situational judgement test components. There have been isolated failures of the end of curriculum and clinical skills exams which were successfully remediated on the first attempt. Administration of the summative evaluation requires planning and coordination throughout the academic cycle to develop materials for all components, schedule coordination with the simulation center, training of simulated patients, faculty development for consistency in grading, oversight of remediation activities, and triangulation of data to correlate the results of the summative evaluation with other programmatic outcomes.

它需要一个村庄:开发一个总结性评估过程,以满足规划需求。
摘要:所有医师助理(PA)项目都需要根据认证标准B4.03完成总结性评估,以验证其即将毕业的学生是否成功满足项目定义的能力,并准备好过渡到临床实践。2019年,德克萨斯大学西南医学中心的PA项目更新了总结性评估流程,纳入了PA教育协会课程结束考试,将临床技能考试和情景判断测试转换为在线格式,并引入了八站客观结构临床考试组件。摘要的所有4个组成部分都映射到项目定义的能力、标准B4.03的要素和PA职业的能力。为总结和补救活动的每个组成部分定义了削减分数,以解决重新测试之前的知识缺陷。到目前为止,过去6个队列的所有学生都成功完成了客观结构临床检查和情景判断测试的部分。有一些孤立的课程结束和临床技能考试的失败,在第一次尝试时就成功地纠正了。总结性评估的管理需要在整个学术周期内进行规划和协调,以开发所有组成部分的材料,与模拟中心的时间表协调,模拟患者的培训,教师分级一致性的发展,补救活动的监督,以及将总结性评估结果与其他项目结果相关联的数据三角测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信