Utility of Chitosan-Based Devices in the Treatment of Peripheral Nerve Injuries: A Literature Review.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Crystal Jing, Ethan Ong, Emmanuel O Emovon, Hana Shafique, Marcus A F Valenta, Amit S Mohite, Neill Y Li
{"title":"Utility of Chitosan-Based Devices in the Treatment of Peripheral Nerve Injuries: A Literature Review.","authors":"Crystal Jing, Ethan Ong, Emmanuel O Emovon, Hana Shafique, Marcus A F Valenta, Amit S Mohite, Neill Y Li","doi":"10.1177/19373341251376279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chitosan is a resorbable cationic polysaccharide known for its biodegradability and electrostatic and self-aggregation properties. Chitosan has been shown to influence Schwann cell proliferation, reduce scarring, support axon growth, and provide superior peripheral nerve regenerative outcomes compared to nerve injuries without chitosan. This article reviews preclinical studies to collectively determine whether the presence of chitosan enhances neuroregenerative outcomes following nerve injury as compared to settings without chitosan. The most consistent outcome measure reported across studies was functional analysis, followed by histomorphometry. Most animal studies showed no significant differences in functional recovery, electrophysiology metrics, and histomorphometry parameters between chitosan-based conduit repairs, reconstruction using autografts, or direct nerve repairs. A subset of studies reported superior outcomes with chitosan conduits for nerve reconstruction, while others indicated inferior results compared to conventional repair. The two human studies focused on digital nerve repair with sensory gaps ≤ 26 mm and demonstrated significantly improved 2-point discrimination at 6 months and equivalent function by 12 months with chitosan conduits compared to standard direct repair. The introduction of chitosan into nerve repair and reconstructions provides a potentially beneficial biological augmentation to the nerve microenvironment that enhances cellular, electrophysiological, and functional outcomes. However, heterogeneous approaches to functional, electrodiagnostic, and histological assessments in addition to varying control groups create a significant deficiency in understanding the true utility of chitosan-based devices within the field of nerve regeneration. Further needs for standardization in the study and comparison of biomaterials for effective clinical translation is needed. Nonetheless, this study highlights papers that are effective in achieving a strong propensity towards the utility of chitosan within biomaterial development for nerve reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19373341251376279","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chitosan is a resorbable cationic polysaccharide known for its biodegradability and electrostatic and self-aggregation properties. Chitosan has been shown to influence Schwann cell proliferation, reduce scarring, support axon growth, and provide superior peripheral nerve regenerative outcomes compared to nerve injuries without chitosan. This article reviews preclinical studies to collectively determine whether the presence of chitosan enhances neuroregenerative outcomes following nerve injury as compared to settings without chitosan. The most consistent outcome measure reported across studies was functional analysis, followed by histomorphometry. Most animal studies showed no significant differences in functional recovery, electrophysiology metrics, and histomorphometry parameters between chitosan-based conduit repairs, reconstruction using autografts, or direct nerve repairs. A subset of studies reported superior outcomes with chitosan conduits for nerve reconstruction, while others indicated inferior results compared to conventional repair. The two human studies focused on digital nerve repair with sensory gaps ≤ 26 mm and demonstrated significantly improved 2-point discrimination at 6 months and equivalent function by 12 months with chitosan conduits compared to standard direct repair. The introduction of chitosan into nerve repair and reconstructions provides a potentially beneficial biological augmentation to the nerve microenvironment that enhances cellular, electrophysiological, and functional outcomes. However, heterogeneous approaches to functional, electrodiagnostic, and histological assessments in addition to varying control groups create a significant deficiency in understanding the true utility of chitosan-based devices within the field of nerve regeneration. Further needs for standardization in the study and comparison of biomaterials for effective clinical translation is needed. Nonetheless, this study highlights papers that are effective in achieving a strong propensity towards the utility of chitosan within biomaterial development for nerve reconstruction.

壳聚糖基装置在周围神经损伤治疗中的应用:文献综述。
壳聚糖是一种可吸收的阳离子多糖,以其生物降解性、静电性和自聚集性而闻名。与没有壳聚糖的神经损伤相比,壳聚糖已被证明可以影响雪旺细胞增殖,减少疤痕,支持轴突生长,并提供更好的周围神经再生结果。本文回顾了临床前研究,共同确定与没有壳聚糖的情况相比,壳聚糖的存在是否能增强神经损伤后的神经再生结果。所有研究中报告的最一致的结果测量是功能分析,其次是组织形态测量。大多数动物研究显示,壳聚糖基导管修复、自体移植物重建或直接神经修复在功能恢复、电生理指标和组织形态学参数方面没有显著差异。一些研究报告了壳聚糖导管用于神经重建的优越结果,而另一些研究则表明与传统修复相比效果较差。两项人体研究集中在感觉间隙≤26 mm的指神经修复上,与标准直接修复相比,壳聚糖导管在6个月时显着改善了2点识别,在12个月时具有同等功能。将壳聚糖引入神经修复和重建中,为神经微环境提供了潜在的有益生物增强,增强了细胞、电生理和功能结果。然而,不同的功能、电诊断和组织学评估方法,以及不同的对照组,在理解基于壳聚糖的装置在神经再生领域的真正用途方面存在重大缺陷。为了有效的临床翻译,需要进一步规范生物材料的研究和比较。尽管如此,本研究强调了有效地实现壳聚糖在神经重建生物材料开发中的应用的强烈倾向的论文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews
Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
1.60%
发文量
150
期刊介绍: Tissue Engineering Reviews (Part B) meets the urgent need for high-quality review articles by presenting critical literature overviews and systematic summaries of research within the field to assess the current standing and future directions within relevant areas and technologies. Part B publishes bi-monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信