Joyce L Woo, Tara M Swanson, Shiraz A Maskatia, Shaine A Morris, John D Lantos, Angira Patel
{"title":"Associations of Physician Perspectives, Personal Choices, and Counseling for Severe Congenital Heart Defects.","authors":"Joyce L Woo, Tara M Swanson, Shiraz A Maskatia, Shaine A Morris, John D Lantos, Angira Patel","doi":"10.1002/pd.6901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether physicians' perspectives of outcomes or personal choices are associated with prenatal counseling for termination of pregnancy (TOP) or perinatal hospice for severe congenital heart defects (CHDs).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Multicenter survey of pediatric cardiologists and congenital heart surgeons in the United States, 2016-2018. The survey measured perspectives of CHD outcomes, personal choices/considerations, and prenatal counseling for TOP or perinatal hospice. Bivariate comparisons estimated associations between outcome perspectives, personal choices, and counseling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Response rate was 77% (135/176); 47% (63/135) believed that single-ventricle portends good long-term quality of life or transplant-free survival. The majority (70%-90% depending on CHD type) would consider perinatal hospice for their own child, but a minority (2%-16% depending on CHD type) would choose perinatal hospice over TOP or postnatal intervention. Physicians who would consider TOP for themselves/their partner were more likely to counsel about TOP than physicians who would not consider TOP for themselves/their partner (99% vs. 67%, p < 0.001). There were no associations between institutional practice, outcome perspectives, personal consideration for hospice, and counseling practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physician perspectives of single-ventricle outcomes remain guarded but were not associated with counseling. However, personal choices/considerations are associated with counseling practices; therefore, considering personal beliefs is crucial to help families make fully informed decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6901","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To assess whether physicians' perspectives of outcomes or personal choices are associated with prenatal counseling for termination of pregnancy (TOP) or perinatal hospice for severe congenital heart defects (CHDs).
Method: Multicenter survey of pediatric cardiologists and congenital heart surgeons in the United States, 2016-2018. The survey measured perspectives of CHD outcomes, personal choices/considerations, and prenatal counseling for TOP or perinatal hospice. Bivariate comparisons estimated associations between outcome perspectives, personal choices, and counseling.
Results: Response rate was 77% (135/176); 47% (63/135) believed that single-ventricle portends good long-term quality of life or transplant-free survival. The majority (70%-90% depending on CHD type) would consider perinatal hospice for their own child, but a minority (2%-16% depending on CHD type) would choose perinatal hospice over TOP or postnatal intervention. Physicians who would consider TOP for themselves/their partner were more likely to counsel about TOP than physicians who would not consider TOP for themselves/their partner (99% vs. 67%, p < 0.001). There were no associations between institutional practice, outcome perspectives, personal consideration for hospice, and counseling practices.
Conclusion: Physician perspectives of single-ventricle outcomes remain guarded but were not associated with counseling. However, personal choices/considerations are associated with counseling practices; therefore, considering personal beliefs is crucial to help families make fully informed decisions.
目的:探讨重度先天性心脏缺陷(CHDs)患者的产前终止妊娠咨询(TOP)或围生期临终关怀是否与医生的结局观点或个人选择相关。方法:对2016-2018年美国儿科心脏病专家和先天性心脏外科医生进行多中心调查。调查测量了冠心病结局、个人选择/考虑、产前咨询或围产期临终关怀的观点。双变量比较估计了结果观点、个人选择和咨询之间的关联。结果:有效率为77% (135/176);47%(63/135)认为单心室预示着良好的长期生活质量或无移植生存。大多数(根据冠心病类型70%-90%)会考虑对自己的孩子进行围产期安宁疗护,但少数(根据冠心病类型2%-16%)会选择围产期安宁疗护而不是TOP或产后干预。为自己/伴侣考虑TOP的医生比不为自己/伴侣考虑TOP的医生更有可能就TOP进行咨询(99% vs. 67%, p结论:医生对单心室结果的看法仍然是谨慎的,但与咨询无关。然而,个人选择/考虑与咨询实践有关;因此,考虑个人信仰对于帮助家庭做出充分知情的决定至关重要。
期刊介绍:
Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling