Depression, Anxiety, and Stress in a Burned-Out Oncologist.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Nevena Randjelovic, Marija Peulic, Marina Petronijevic, Aleksandar Djuric, Kristina Dugalic
{"title":"Depression, Anxiety, and Stress in a Burned-Out Oncologist.","authors":"Nevena Randjelovic, Marija Peulic, Marina Petronijevic, Aleksandar Djuric, Kristina Dugalic","doi":"10.30773/pi.2024.0311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Considering the established intertwined relationships between burnout and other psychiatric disorders, this study aimed to clarify the existing levels of depression, anxiety, stress, emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment and their relationship among oncologists-a seemingly professional group at risk for mental health issues development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in January 2024, involving 159 oncologists from Serbia and the Serbian Republic. Participants completed an online questionnaire assessing socio-demographic characteristics and working conditons, depression, anxiety, stress, and burnout using validated scales-the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 and the Maslach Burnout Inventory- Human Services Survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicate that respondents were mildly depressed, moderately anxious, and mildly stressed overall. Regarding three dimensions of burnout respondents have moderate emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and low personal accomplishment. No significant differences were found in depression, anxiety, and stress among medical, surgical, and radiation oncologists. Whether the respondents are seeing a psychiatrist and/or undergoing psychiatric therapy was predictive of depression, anxiety, and stress. Economic status was predictive for depression and stress, while an additional predictive factor of anxiety was the presence of somatic illness. Further analysis showed depression and stress levels can be predicted by all three dimensions of burnout, whereas anxiety levels can be predicted by the level of depersonalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings emphasize the complex interplay between burnout and other mental health disorders in oncologists, highlighting the need for targeted mental health interventions and support systems within the oncology field to mitigate the psychological toll on these physicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":21164,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Investigation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2024.0311","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Considering the established intertwined relationships between burnout and other psychiatric disorders, this study aimed to clarify the existing levels of depression, anxiety, stress, emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment and their relationship among oncologists-a seemingly professional group at risk for mental health issues development.

Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in January 2024, involving 159 oncologists from Serbia and the Serbian Republic. Participants completed an online questionnaire assessing socio-demographic characteristics and working conditons, depression, anxiety, stress, and burnout using validated scales-the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 and the Maslach Burnout Inventory- Human Services Survey.

Results: Results indicate that respondents were mildly depressed, moderately anxious, and mildly stressed overall. Regarding three dimensions of burnout respondents have moderate emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and low personal accomplishment. No significant differences were found in depression, anxiety, and stress among medical, surgical, and radiation oncologists. Whether the respondents are seeing a psychiatrist and/or undergoing psychiatric therapy was predictive of depression, anxiety, and stress. Economic status was predictive for depression and stress, while an additional predictive factor of anxiety was the presence of somatic illness. Further analysis showed depression and stress levels can be predicted by all three dimensions of burnout, whereas anxiety levels can be predicted by the level of depersonalization.

Conclusion: These findings emphasize the complex interplay between burnout and other mental health disorders in oncologists, highlighting the need for targeted mental health interventions and support systems within the oncology field to mitigate the psychological toll on these physicians.

一位精疲力竭的肿瘤医生的抑郁、焦虑和压力。
目的:考虑到职业倦怠与其他精神疾病之间的相互交织关系,本研究旨在阐明肿瘤医生这一看似专业的心理健康问题发展风险群体的抑郁、焦虑、压力、情绪耗竭、人格解体和个人成就感水平及其关系。方法:在2024年1月进行了一项横断面观察性研究,涉及来自塞尔维亚和塞尔维亚共和国的159名肿瘤学家。参与者完成了一份在线问卷,评估社会人口特征和工作条件,抑郁,焦虑,压力和倦怠,使用有效的量表-抑郁焦虑压力量表-21和马斯拉克倦怠量表-人类服务调查。结果:结果表明,受访者是轻度抑郁,中度焦虑,和轻度压力总体。在倦怠三个维度上,被调查者表现为中度情绪耗竭、人格解体和低个人成就感。内科、外科和放射肿瘤学家在抑郁、焦虑和压力方面没有显著差异。受访者是否正在看精神病医生和/或接受精神治疗可以预测抑郁、焦虑和压力。经济状况是抑郁和压力的预测因素,而焦虑的另一个预测因素是躯体疾病的存在。进一步的分析表明,抑郁和压力水平可以通过倦怠的所有三个维度来预测,而焦虑水平可以通过去人格化水平来预测。结论:这些发现强调了肿瘤医生职业倦怠和其他心理健康障碍之间复杂的相互作用,强调了肿瘤领域有针对性的心理健康干预和支持系统的必要性,以减轻这些医生的心理负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Psychiatry Investigation is published on the 25th day of every month in English by the Korean Neuropsychiatric Association (KNPA). The Journal covers the whole range of psychiatry and neuroscience. Both basic and clinical contributions are encouraged from all disciplines and research areas relevant to the pathophysiology and management of neuropsychiatric disorders and symptoms, as well as researches related to cross cultural psychiatry and ethnic issues in psychiatry. The Journal publishes editorials, review articles, original articles, brief reports, viewpoints and correspondences. All research articles are peer reviewed. Contributions are accepted for publication on the condition that their substance has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. Authors submitting papers to the Journal (serially or otherwise) with a common theme or using data derived from the same sample (or a subset thereof) must send details of all relevant previous publications and simultaneous submissions. The Journal is not responsible for statements made by contributors. Material in the Journal does not necessarily reflect the views of the Editor or of the KNPA. Manuscripts accepted for publication are copy-edited to improve readability and to ensure conformity with house style.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信