{"title":"Application of a Flash Glucose Monitoring System for the Evaluation of Blood Flow in Free Flaps.","authors":"Hitoshi Nemoto, Daiki Morita, Miyu Yoshizawa, Yukio Seki, Kotaro Imagawa, Yotaro Tsunoda, Chieko Komaba, Ushio Hanai","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The key to salvaging free flaps following postoperative hemodynamic compromise is early detection and prompt intervention. Although clinical examinations, such as observing flap color, are often used for monitoring, they are subjective and have limited accuracy. This underscores the need for a low-cost, simple, and objective alternative. A potential solution is the use of a flash glucose monitoring (FGM) system for flap monitoring. In this study, we retrospectively investigated whether FGM is beneficial for monitoring flap blood flow.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of patients who underwent breast reconstruction using a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap transfer. An FGM sensor was applied to each monitoring flap, and interstitial fluid glucose (IFG) levels were measured regularly during a 7-day postoperative period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 37 flaps were evaluated. Five flaps required surgical revision due to hemodynamic compromise; 1, in a patient with diabetes, completely failed, whereas 3 were successfully salvaged. The remaining flap developed arterial occlusion on the sixth day and was partially necrotic. In all cases requiring revision, except for the patient with diabetes, IFG levels dropped to less than 40 mg/dL before any clinical examination changes were observed. The IFG cutoff value, defined as less than 40 mg/dL, was calculated to have 100% sensitivity and 91% specificity within 48 hours postoperatively, with a negative predictive value of 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Measuring IFG using FGM is a noncontact, simple, and low-cost method. This method can provide a highly effective screening method for human and economic resource use.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 9","pages":"e7131"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453357/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The key to salvaging free flaps following postoperative hemodynamic compromise is early detection and prompt intervention. Although clinical examinations, such as observing flap color, are often used for monitoring, they are subjective and have limited accuracy. This underscores the need for a low-cost, simple, and objective alternative. A potential solution is the use of a flash glucose monitoring (FGM) system for flap monitoring. In this study, we retrospectively investigated whether FGM is beneficial for monitoring flap blood flow.
Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of patients who underwent breast reconstruction using a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap transfer. An FGM sensor was applied to each monitoring flap, and interstitial fluid glucose (IFG) levels were measured regularly during a 7-day postoperative period.
Results: A total of 37 flaps were evaluated. Five flaps required surgical revision due to hemodynamic compromise; 1, in a patient with diabetes, completely failed, whereas 3 were successfully salvaged. The remaining flap developed arterial occlusion on the sixth day and was partially necrotic. In all cases requiring revision, except for the patient with diabetes, IFG levels dropped to less than 40 mg/dL before any clinical examination changes were observed. The IFG cutoff value, defined as less than 40 mg/dL, was calculated to have 100% sensitivity and 91% specificity within 48 hours postoperatively, with a negative predictive value of 100%.
Conclusions: Measuring IFG using FGM is a noncontact, simple, and low-cost method. This method can provide a highly effective screening method for human and economic resource use.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.