Application of a Flash Glucose Monitoring System for the Evaluation of Blood Flow in Free Flaps.

IF 1.8 Q3 SURGERY
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2025-09-22 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000007131
Hitoshi Nemoto, Daiki Morita, Miyu Yoshizawa, Yukio Seki, Kotaro Imagawa, Yotaro Tsunoda, Chieko Komaba, Ushio Hanai
{"title":"Application of a Flash Glucose Monitoring System for the Evaluation of Blood Flow in Free Flaps.","authors":"Hitoshi Nemoto, Daiki Morita, Miyu Yoshizawa, Yukio Seki, Kotaro Imagawa, Yotaro Tsunoda, Chieko Komaba, Ushio Hanai","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The key to salvaging free flaps following postoperative hemodynamic compromise is early detection and prompt intervention. Although clinical examinations, such as observing flap color, are often used for monitoring, they are subjective and have limited accuracy. This underscores the need for a low-cost, simple, and objective alternative. A potential solution is the use of a flash glucose monitoring (FGM) system for flap monitoring. In this study, we retrospectively investigated whether FGM is beneficial for monitoring flap blood flow.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of patients who underwent breast reconstruction using a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap transfer. An FGM sensor was applied to each monitoring flap, and interstitial fluid glucose (IFG) levels were measured regularly during a 7-day postoperative period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 37 flaps were evaluated. Five flaps required surgical revision due to hemodynamic compromise; 1, in a patient with diabetes, completely failed, whereas 3 were successfully salvaged. The remaining flap developed arterial occlusion on the sixth day and was partially necrotic. In all cases requiring revision, except for the patient with diabetes, IFG levels dropped to less than 40 mg/dL before any clinical examination changes were observed. The IFG cutoff value, defined as less than 40 mg/dL, was calculated to have 100% sensitivity and 91% specificity within 48 hours postoperatively, with a negative predictive value of 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Measuring IFG using FGM is a noncontact, simple, and low-cost method. This method can provide a highly effective screening method for human and economic resource use.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 9","pages":"e7131"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453357/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The key to salvaging free flaps following postoperative hemodynamic compromise is early detection and prompt intervention. Although clinical examinations, such as observing flap color, are often used for monitoring, they are subjective and have limited accuracy. This underscores the need for a low-cost, simple, and objective alternative. A potential solution is the use of a flash glucose monitoring (FGM) system for flap monitoring. In this study, we retrospectively investigated whether FGM is beneficial for monitoring flap blood flow.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of patients who underwent breast reconstruction using a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap transfer. An FGM sensor was applied to each monitoring flap, and interstitial fluid glucose (IFG) levels were measured regularly during a 7-day postoperative period.

Results: A total of 37 flaps were evaluated. Five flaps required surgical revision due to hemodynamic compromise; 1, in a patient with diabetes, completely failed, whereas 3 were successfully salvaged. The remaining flap developed arterial occlusion on the sixth day and was partially necrotic. In all cases requiring revision, except for the patient with diabetes, IFG levels dropped to less than 40 mg/dL before any clinical examination changes were observed. The IFG cutoff value, defined as less than 40 mg/dL, was calculated to have 100% sensitivity and 91% specificity within 48 hours postoperatively, with a negative predictive value of 100%.

Conclusions: Measuring IFG using FGM is a noncontact, simple, and low-cost method. This method can provide a highly effective screening method for human and economic resource use.

瞬时血糖监测系统在自由皮瓣血流评估中的应用。
背景:术后血流动力学损伤后修复游离皮瓣的关键是早期发现和及时干预。虽然临床检查,如观察皮瓣颜色,经常用于监测,但它们是主观的,准确性有限。这强调了对低成本、简单和客观的替代方案的需求。一种潜在的解决方案是使用瞬时血糖监测(FGM)系统来监测皮瓣。在这项研究中,我们回顾性地研究了女性生殖器切割是否有利于监测皮瓣血流。方法:我们回顾性分析了应用腹下穿支皮瓣进行乳房重建的病例。在每个监测皮瓣上应用FGM传感器,并在术后7天内定期测量间质液葡萄糖(IFG)水平。结果:共评估了37个皮瓣。5个皮瓣因血流动力学受损需要手术修复;1例糖尿病患者完全失败,3例成功抢救。剩余皮瓣在第六天发生动脉闭塞,部分坏死。在所有需要修改的病例中,除糖尿病患者外,在观察到任何临床检查变化之前,IFG水平降至低于40 mg/dL。IFG临界值(定义为小于40 mg/dL)在术后48小时内具有100%的敏感性和91%的特异性,阴性预测值为100%。结论:采用女性生殖器切割法测量IFG是一种非接触、简单、低成本的方法。该方法可为人力资源和经济资源的利用提供一种高效的筛选方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信